Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6631|SE London

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

That varies so much depending on country and models. There are many steps in mid-range for example. 8800GT being lower midrange and Q9300 being higher midrange. It is impossible to start comparing GPU/CPU prices that closely but you are much more likely to spend more money on GPU than CPU.
For example 9800GTX costs about 270€ here and the q9300 on the other hand is only 200€.

And I wouldn't count E7200 low end. It is just a tad away from E8200.
Look at it this way, the most expensive GPU is way cheaper than the most expensive CPU as well as the cheapest currentish CPUs being more expensive than the cheapest GPUs. If you want to get down to things like the E1200 (which is why on my post I didn't call it low end, I called it lower end) then that's more expensive than a very low end current GPU like the 8300GS or the 8400GS. The price gap is smaller, since they're priced so low anyway, but it's still clear.
the lowest end AMD seems to be priced the same as 8300GS in here. And I challenge you to look it at this way: decent CPUs cost today less than decent gfx cards. like HD3870 I sold to freezer at 110€ is a very decent gfx card. And my E2180 is very decent CPU but it costed only 56€.
Although I see your point as well.
When OC'd it's a decent CPU.

To be honest, I find just over £100 mark to be the sweet spot for both CPU and GPU in the UK. But that's because I prefer to have faster GPUs since the most demanding thing I typically do on my computers at home is gaming and most games are GPU bound. That doesn't really demonstrate that GPUs are the same price, because they're not.

But I can see where you're coming from, but just remember you are looking at this from a specialised perspective where you are more likely to be putting more strain on your GPU than CPU and therefore need a disproportionately powerful GPU.
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6598|UK

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

That varies so much depending on country and models. There are many steps in mid-range for example. 8800GT being lower midrange and Q9300 being higher midrange. It is impossible to start comparing GPU/CPU prices that closely but you are much more likely to spend more money on GPU than CPU.
For example 9800GTX costs about 270€ here and the q9300 on the other hand is only 200€.

And I wouldn't count E7200 low end. It is just a tad away from E8200.
Look at it this way, the most expensive GPU is way cheaper than the most expensive CPU as well as the cheapest currentish CPUs being more expensive than the cheapest GPUs. If you want to get down to things like the E1200 (which is why on my post I didn't call it low end, I called it lower end) then that's more expensive than a very low end current GPU like the 8300GS or the 8400GS. The price gap is smaller, since they're priced so low anyway, but it's still clear.
the lowest end AMD seems to be priced the same as 8300GS in here. And I challenge you to look it at this way: decent CPUs cost today less than decent gfx cards. like HD3870 I sold to freezer at 110€ is a very decent gfx card. And my E2180 is very decent CPU but it costed only 56€.
Although I see your point as well.
His interpretation was wrong.

Bell wrote:

He has a point, though if they got destroyed by intel, then, expect your next CPU to cost as much as your graphics card fellas :\

Martyn
I was referring specifically to the type of guys on here who have a bias towards there GPU (granted I didn’t emphatically state it, but as ever on this site, its implied, after all, when someone asks about building a new rig on here, its automatically assumed its a gaming machine) when it comes to how much money they spend on each part.  Meaning, that those same guys, if Intel forced AMD out of the market would be spending much more on there CPU hence,

''expect your next CPU to cost as much as your graphics card fellas''. 

Or to put it another way, you’re going to have to pay more for a CPU to compliment your graphics card.  I don’t know about anyone else but I never stated a GPU costs more (proportionally) to the CPU, but I did say that, if this set of circumstances did come about, then we would be paying much more for our CPU's.  Bertser brought that proportional argument in, which to be fair is valid, but it runs at a tangent to my statement, he’s correct, but I didn’t say that.

Martyn
The#1Spot
Member
+105|6589|byah

jamiet757 wrote:

Pepsi and Coke pay Grocery Stores, Gas Stations, and other stores to only sell their products all the time...so what? That is the way the world works. If you can form an alliance with another company to only use your products, then so be it. Maybe AMD should try to ally with a company and do the same.

Most that will happen is a fine, possibly.
The difference is that there is only 2 major cpu companies.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard