BF2S Forums Who are Liberals, listen to Air American Radio

Capt. Foley wrote:

Havent experienced this radio or w/e but I seriously hate liberals and there constanly critiziing the people that give them the rights to do the bs that they do.

Funniest thing about them, is the way they criticise Bush for EVERYTHING he does, but yet they never offer a better solution, or any solution for that matter. It's either he took to long, or it wasn't enough.

I heard one show where they were saying that Bush new the levies would break in New Orleans and did nothing because all the blacks are Democrats.......

I am no Bush supporter, but I am not an Idiot.

I may just vote Republican this year because of Air American Radio, these Liberals are scary but I don't want the country bankrupted by the Republicans trying to reform the whole Middle east with money we don't have.

Rhoads IS insane.I heard her seriously suggest that the republicans were going to start burning war dissenters alive.

No, I actually listen to good liberal talk radio, which isn't nearly as exaggerated as what you've posted.  NPR and KGO with Bernie Ward, Gene Burns, and Ray Taliafierro have some great shows.  Unlike just saying "Repubs are WRONG WRONG WRONG!!", they actually provide an alternative solution to the government's actions...and that doesn't mean favoring Democrats. 

And sorry, that doesn't prove that "Liberals are Racist, Socialist, Dangerous, HateMongers, and AntiAmerican."  It just proves your own opinion about the people you've particularly heard.  Could this be the resurgence of McCarthyism all over again?

Whoa...take a step back from the fanatical edge and put the little puppies down. It sounds like you've got some issues to work out. Air America is certainly slanted left, thus the basic premise of the station. Because I don't think like Rush Limbaugh, being a liberal, means I don't listen to Rush Limbaugh or Vikki McKenna. Did you expect Air America to share your same opinions, because obviously you are very very far from the left. I'm not trying to suggest that you're over the top, or mildly psychotic. I went to the doctor because it hurt when I poked myself in the eye, the doctor told me not to poke myself in the eye.

As to your other suggestions, I especially liked the Nazi/Commie refferences...straight outa the conservative buzzword collection. Most liberals aren't expecting communism or to convert the masses, unlike other groups I've heard of...ahhem. In fact many "liberals" hold strong beliefs and some are a part of almost every Christian sect, just like many conservatives. None of these beliefs are anything close to Nazi Socialism or Communist Russia. Personally I resent the implication and would appreciate and appology.

By the way, there are many prosperous pseudo socialist nations in the world today. Ideas like universal health care, Social Programs, the safety net idea can and do succeed. I'm not going to argue that what's in place is good or even beneficial. The problem is, at least between us liberals and you conservatives, instead of wanting to fix the problem you seem to believe that it'd be better for these programs to simply disappear. So..like most things, we brand you facists and you brand us commies.

Do you have terrorism all figured out? I'm sure those in charge might be interested with what you might have to say. Because untill we stop the causation to terrorism we're only creating more of a problem. Terrorism isn't nearly as easy as invading a country, creating a democracy and moving on. Unless we can counter the fanatical ideals these bastards run on, I can't see an end to the "war on terror". We certainly can't keep invading country after country in the name of freedom, sooner or later other developed countries that don't think like us will try and intercede. So...do liberals wish to understand the problem? History isn't going to be kind on the United States throughout the 80's and 90's. We made some enemies and they are now coming back to haunt us. That's not an excuse, it's a fact. I'm not saying that we should roll over and not fight terrorism, can we combat terrorism through it's roots more effectively? As I said I don't have any answers and there sure are a hell of a lot of questions. If this makes me a Terrorism Supporter than I think that definition needs some work.

All in all I could probably find a letter, post, email or editorial, that exactly mirrors what you "originally" wrote. I honestly can't blame you because much of what's on Air America is garbage, not really any better than the conservative side of the moon. But attacking all liberals for Air America's slanted view is pretty disrepectfull. Sticks and stones....

nah...let the libs have their way.

they would eliminate themselves and their ideology because the next generation would be aborted, all the women would be too busy working to raise a family with their wives, the role of the father would be completely gone between welfare and feminazis, and no one will have guns so all the criminals (who will have the guns anyway) will wipe them out.

Then we can start over right. (pun unintentional)

ps--isn't it funny how they're pro-choice, but there's only one choice?  Should you chose life, you're a fanatical Christian.

It's just the same as "all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others"



you crazy libs can -1 me all you want.  You are so concerned about individual rights that you do not take into account the future of humanity.

Last edited by G3|Genius (2006-05-20 14:07:21)

psychotoxic187 wrote:

he's a sick POS who deserves to die.

And that makes him separate from the many other horrible dictators of the world? We cant start a war over a "bad guy" who might of posed a risk. There would be a lot of war.

Now the war in Afghanistan, is a different story.


Wasn't me who karma'd ya, I have the balls to speak my mind.

hey jerkoff i'm a socialist and an american
socialism isn't anti-american and capitalism isn't american
none of the founders were capitalists and if you look at their writings our current economic system is the antithesis of what they had invisioned.
it makes me so sick to think that so many people who will never make it to the top of the economic pyramid have bought into the economic rhetoric of the elites
you will often here people saying "i dont want the government taking my money and giving it to people who haven't earned it" as if they will one day achieve great wealth... most people in america actually empathize more with the elites than with their fellow workers.


(waiting for negative karma from all the irrational, unintelligent, militaristic wal-mart shoppers out there who can only LASH OUT at things they don't understand or don't agree with)

I'm sorry dude but I'm not a white, rich, Christian, land-owner.  Our economic system has nothing to offer for me. It has nothing to offer for you, either. When people of this country stop being satisfied with the crumbs that the elites throw to us to placate us, stop being satisfied that our country "allows" us to work very hard for years to finally own our own living space complete with gadgets and a vroom vroom machine and start demanding what is rightfully theirs, then we will have the people's republic that we are entitled to.

workers of the nation unite

And just to insure i have the democrats -1ing me, here's a couple Nader quotes:

"Today the large organization is lord and master, and most of its employees have been desensitized much as were the medieval peasants who never knew they were serfs. "

"The only difference between the Republican and Democratic parties is the velocities with which their knees hit the floor when corporations knock on their door. That's the only difference. "

Last edited by ComradeWho (2006-05-20 14:57:10)

jonnykill wrote:

Stalin did have the rioght idea but we just need to apply it to all the liberals . Round them up , kill them all , problems sovled

not worthy of comment

Snipedya14 wrote:

Right, lets take one radical radio station and generalize all liberals.


I think they are looney, dont get me wrong, but to say that proves all liberals as crazy...thats just as bad.

Ok, Point well taken BUT I guess it depends on what defines a Liberal.  They openly call themselves Liberals and Progressives.  Thus to me they defined it.

Perhaps I should have said PROGRESSIVE instead of Liberal, especially since I consider Republicans and Democrats as being Liberal.

Janysc wrote:

psychotoxic187 wrote:

Snipedya14 wrote:

And that makes him separate from the many other horrible dictators of the world? We cant start a war over a "bad guy" who might of posed a risk. There would be a lot of war.

Now the war in Afghanistan, is a different story.


Wasn't me who karma'd ya, I have the balls to speak my mind.

He's not just some horrible dictator. He's killed thousands of innocent people, had thousands of women raped. Like I said there are ties between him and Bin Laden, he was harboring Al Qaeda. We should take out any dictator that poses a nuclear threat or otherwise towards us, and any other place on earth.

Well, go on, take Iran and North Korea while you try to hold Islam down with your shaking boot.

I dare ya.

And which horrible dictator hasn't killed thousands of innocent people etc.? Isn't the fact that they do horrible stuff make them horrible? A dictator is a ruler who does not see the value of democracy, he doesn't necessarily rove around with a bloody sword and cackle at his impaled victims.

But hey, Iran's and North Korea's national leaders have some nukes down their chimneys, as well as some kick-ass criminal record. Go get 'em. See if your army can keep up with your president's words, being that you already send your mentally unstable and retired housewives to fight (the wonders of 60 Minutes).

Now let's greet the negative karma with open arms.

Good job comprehending my post. Look he's not just a horrible dictator, he posed a serious nuclear threat, as well as terrorist threat, why do you not bring up those points? As far as Iran is concerned, they are weak, but yet they demand we follow their teachings or else. You keep forgetting it's the UN that's also going after Iran, and Korea, not just the US.


Where in the hell do you see retired houswives in the military? Boy if that's not ignorance I don't know what is. Our military is the best trained in the world, next Britain. You'd be a fool to think we cannot bring the fight, and back up our commander in chiefs words.

jonnykill wrote:

ComradeWho wrote:

hey jerkoff i'm a socialist and an american
socialism isn't anti-american and capitalism isn't american
none of the founders were capitalists and if you look at their writings our current economic system is the antithesis of what they had invisioned.
it makes me so sick to think that so many people who will never make it to the top of the economic pyramid have bought into the economic rhetoric of the elites
you will often here people saying "i dont want the government taking my money and giving it to people who haven't earned it" as if they will one day achieve great wealth... most people in america actually empathize more with the elites than with their fellow workers.


(waiting for negative karma from all the irrational, unintelligent, militaristic wal-mart shoppers out there who can only LASH OUT at things they don't understand or don't agree with)

I'm sorry dude but I'm not a white, rich, Christian, land-owner.  Our economic system has nothing to offer for me. It has nothing to offer for you, either. When people of this country stop being satisfied with the crumbs that the elites throw to us to placate us, stop being satisfied that our country "allows" us to work very hard for years to finally own our own living space complete with gadgets and a vroom vroom machine and start demanding what is rightfully theirs, then we will have the people's republic that we are entitled to.

workers of the nation unite

And just to insure i have the democrats -1ing me, here's a couple Nader quotes:

"Today the large organization is lord and master, and most of its employees have been desensitized much as were the medieval peasants who never knew they were serfs. "

"The only difference between the Republican and Democratic parties is the velocities with which their knees hit the floor when corporations knock on their door. That's the only difference. "

Wow I don't know where to even begin . Capitalism isn't American ? ooooooooook ....
Your right though socialism isn't anti-American but it just so happens that most anti-Americans living in America are socialists . Ever hear of Commie/ I mean California ? Holt mother of god if I had the time to write some of the things I've heard at a few business meeting out there and on off time . After hearing such shit let me put it this way . If there EVER is another Terrorist attack in the US I truly , no seriously , hope it is in California and I hope it takes most of the people living there out . And I'm not kidding . California is freaking communist central .
And what the fuck are you babbling about when you say capitalism and our economic system has nothing to offer you since your not white ? You have evey opputunity to kick ass as you see fit . Not a damn thing is stopping you . Now your just mad talking , you make no sense at all .

capitalism necessitates a heirarchal distribution of wealth. it necessitates a pyramid. it necessitates "haves" and "have nots." it necessitates people who are so without resources that they must sell their labor for less than it's actual value so one with resources can profit. not everybody can succeed in capitalism since capitalism necessitates that most people are unsuccessful. there are winners (these are usually people born with some material advantage) and there are losers (most everybody born into the world, especially those in third world countries). there aren't an unlimited amount of spots for successful people if only they "worked harder" and "wanted" to succeed, unless there are losers capitalism implodes. if we were in a system where everything i just said isn't true it wouldn't be capitalism.

Last edited by ComradeWho (2006-05-20 16:56:43)