| NVidia GTX 275 896Mb | 55% | 55% - 24 | ||||
| ATI 4890 1Gb | 44% | 44% - 19 | ||||
| Total: 43 | ||||||
Last edited by jsnipy (2009-07-17 23:43:42)
Not Meaningful =NooBesT wrote:
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/gaming-graphics-cards-charts-2009-high-quality/compare,1318.html?prod%5B2570%5D=on&prod%5B2553%5D=on
Finray wrote:
If you like higher resolutions with less anti-aliasing, go with GTX 275. If you prefer AA but are willing to take a hit on the resolution side for it go for the 4890.
Just saying.Swan wrote:
Meaningful =Not Meaningful =NooBesT wrote:
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/gaming-graphics-cards-charts-2009-high-quality/compare,1318.html?prod%5B2570%5D=on&prod%5B2553%5D=onFinray wrote:
If you like higher resolutions with less anti-aliasing, go with GTX 275. If you prefer AA but are willing to take a hit on the resolution side for it go for the 4890.
Last edited by some_random_panda (2009-07-18 06:15:36)
GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
GTX 275 or Sapphire HD 4890 Toxic / Vapor-X. These are the alternatives with quieter coolers. It comes to personal preference which one, they perform almost identically (I think the Toxic model should be bit faster than GTX 275 stock due to massive factory OC).
God no.... jsut get the Sapphire toxic instead. it has 960mhz core and is not MSI. -.-xxCaptainBlackxx wrote:
I will buy as soon as possible R4890 Cyclone OC from MSI! So i voted for it
It has Dx10.1 while GTX 275 is still on Dx10.
880 Mhz Core and 3900 Mhz Memory clock! sweet!
and its GDDR5! and GTX 275 is still GDDR3
http://www.msi.com/index.php?func=prodd … od_no=1849
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2009-07-18 06:47:26)
Last edited by xxCaptainBlackxx (2009-07-18 07:03:27)
I'm sure Freezer and you are great friends...xxCaptainBlackxx wrote:
I love MSI
Last edited by TopHat01 (2009-07-18 11:18:37)
You had a bad experience with an MSI product?ceslayer23 wrote:
msi is fucking horrible
Then you're not looking at many benchmarks. The 4890 can go head-to-head with the 275, no problem.Nic wrote:
275... seems to preform better in all the benchmarks I've checked out and from what I've looked into it seems the only single gpu card worth getting atm.
I agree, I thinks it better since its ATi, they are not as greedy as as a corporation as nVidia.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Then you're not looking at many benchmarks. The 4890 can go head-to-head with the 275, no problem.Nic wrote:
275... seems to preform better in all the benchmarks I've checked out and from what I've looked into it seems the only single gpu card worth getting atm.
LOL epic fail reasoning is epic failSwan wrote:
I agree, I thinks it better since its ATi, they are not as greedy as as a corporation as nVidia.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Then you're not looking at many benchmarks. The 4890 can go head-to-head with the 275, no problem.Nic wrote:
275... seems to preform better in all the benchmarks I've checked out and from what I've looked into it seems the only single gpu card worth getting atm.
For me it's not a matter of corporate greed. I just prefer ATI's drivers. I've had better luck and fewer issues with them. When the 48xx series released I couldn't have been happier to rid myself of my 8800GTS.Swan wrote:
I agree, I thinks it better since its ATi, they are not as greedy as as a corporation as nVidia.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Then you're not looking at many benchmarks. The 4890 can go head-to-head with the 275, no problem.Nic wrote:
275... seems to preform better in all the benchmarks I've checked out and from what I've looked into it seems the only single gpu card worth getting atm.
