AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6212

usmarine wrote:

you seem to be missing my point.  i DO agree with most that stuff.  but, he aint in charge.  never will be.  so idc what he says.
That's a defeatist attitude..  You have to care about what he says.. most american agree with his ideas but never heard of him.. Obama will not be there forever.. RP will probably be dead in the next election but other with same ideas will show up. 

I don't understand how you can call him a fucking retard if you agree with most of his ideas.

I would feel strange if i called McCain a fucking retard and in the same time agreeing with most of his ideas..
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6775

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

usmarine wrote:

you seem to be missing my point.  i DO agree with most that stuff.  but, he aint in charge.  never will be.  so idc what he says.
That's a defeatist attitude..  You have to care about what he says.. most american agree with his ideas but never heard of him.. Obama will not be there forever.. RP will probably be dead in the next election but other with same ideas will show up. 

I don't understand how you can call him a fucking retard if you agree with most of his ideas.

I would feel strange if i called McCain a fucking retard and in the same time agreeing with most of his ideas..
he is a retard because there is NO WAY in hell you could implement all those ideas.  wont happen.  thats a fact.  yet he continues to spew it every election cycle.  thats the definition of insanity.  doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results.  retard. :wut;
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6212

Cybargs wrote:

Ok mein fuhrer.
In you case, we all know that you don't like Ron Paul because he want to let Israel take care of itself.

You should be happy, without US interference, Israel would have better chance to accomplish Eretz Yisrael Hashlemah
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6775

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Ok mein fuhrer.
In you case, we all know that you don't like Ron Paul because he want to let Israel take care of itself.

You should be happy, without US interference, Israel would have better chance to accomplish Eretz Yisrael Hashlemah
he is from taiwan you stool
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6730

usmarine wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Ok mein fuhrer.
In you case, we all know that you don't like Ron Paul because he want to let Israel take care of itself.

You should be happy, without US interference, Israel would have better chance to accomplish Eretz Yisrael Hashlemah
he is from taiwan you stool
Lol
I don't give a damn about Israel really. Just because my last name sounds Jewish you assume I'm a Jew?

Cunt.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6212

usmarine wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

usmarine wrote:

you seem to be missing my point.  i DO agree with most that stuff.  but, he aint in charge.  never will be.  so idc what he says.
That's a defeatist attitude..  You have to care about what he says.. most american agree with his ideas but never heard of him.. Obama will not be there forever.. RP will probably be dead in the next election but other with same ideas will show up. 

I don't understand how you can call him a fucking retard if you agree with most of his ideas.

I would feel strange if i called McCain a fucking retard and in the same time agreeing with most of his ideas..
he is a retard because there is NO WAY in hell you could implement all those ideas.  wont happen.  thats a fact.  yet he continues to spew it every election cycle.  thats the definition of insanity.  doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results.  retard. :wut;
That's my point, can you tell me how hard it is to implement the idea of rescuing any failed big businesses?  Of providing houses to all poor people in America?  Free Healthcare for all?  Spending the money you don't even have?

You say no way in hell he can stop the aid to foreign nations, or close military bases.. or secure your borders? Or giving money to failed businesses like GM or Chrysler?  How hard it is to do that if Obama is in the process of giving everything to everyone ?

Why is it harder to cut spending than to spend more and more money you don't have.. It is your money, if you decide to stop sending billions to pakistan or Israel, or if you decide to close the useless Rammstein military base... Nobody can prevent you from doing it.

That's my point, It is not more impossible to implement RP's ideas than to implement Obama socialist vison.  Obama is doing it right now.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6730

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

usmarine wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:


That's a defeatist attitude..  You have to care about what he says.. most american agree with his ideas but never heard of him.. Obama will not be there forever.. RP will probably be dead in the next election but other with same ideas will show up. 

I don't understand how you can call him a fucking retard if you agree with most of his ideas.

I would feel strange if i called McCain a fucking retard and in the same time agreeing with most of his ideas..
he is a retard because there is NO WAY in hell you could implement all those ideas.  wont happen.  thats a fact.  yet he continues to spew it every election cycle.  thats the definition of insanity.  doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results.  retard. :wut;
That's my point, can you tell me how hard it is to implement the idea of rescuing any failed big businesses?  Of providing houses to all poor people in America?  Free Healthcare for all?  Spending the money you don't even have?

You say no way in hell he can stop the aid to foreign nations, or close military bases.. or secure your borders? Or giving money to failed businesses like GM or Chrysler?  How hard it is to do that if Obama is in the process of giving everything to everyone ?

Why is it harder to cut spending than to spend more and more money you don't have.. It is your money, if you decide to stop sending billions to pakistan or Israel, or if you decide to close the useless Rammstein military base... Nobody can prevent you from doing it.

That's my point, It is not more impossible to implement RP's ideas than to implement Obama socialist vison.  Obama is doing it right now.
House of Reps decide budget if you don't know much about how the US gov operates. President can't do much with budget. GG.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6212

Cybargs wrote:

usmarine wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:


In you case, we all know that you don't like Ron Paul because he want to let Israel take care of itself.

You should be happy, without US interference, Israel would have better chance to accomplish Eretz Yisrael Hashlemah
he is from taiwan you stool
Lol
I don't give a damn about Israel really. Just because my last name sounds Jewish you assume I'm a Jew?

Cunt.
I don't care what you are.. back on topic kid or GTFO..  I'm having the first civil discussion in years with marine.. Before you showed up there was no name calling.. and now he called me a stool

See what you did there?
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6482
Ron Paul's ideas are the kind of shit that got us into this mess.

Obama's are the kind that are the best bet for getting out.

For a bit of reference.
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6212

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Ron Paul's ideas are the kind of shit that got us into this mess.
Care to elaborate?

Big goverment is better than small goverment?
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6730

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Ron Paul's ideas are the kind of shit that got us into this mess.
Care to elaborate?

Big goverment is better than small goverment?
Laize-Faire doesn't really work k. It lets the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Regulation is a necesity so companies can't fuck the small man over. You get your holidays and 40 hour weeks and mininum wage due to the evils of socialism. Want laize-faire? Go to China, great country that is.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6419|North Carolina

Cybargs wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Ron Paul's ideas are the kind of shit that got us into this mess.
Care to elaborate?

Big goverment is better than small goverment?
Laize-Faire doesn't really work k. It lets the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Regulation is a necesity so companies can't fuck the small man over. You get your holidays and 40 hour weeks and mininum wage due to the evils of socialism. Want laize-faire? Go to China, great country that is.
Well, Singapore is probably a better example, but the point remains.

A certain amount of regulation is necessary.  Libertarianism has some good ideas, but it also has some extreme naivete.
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6212

Cybargs wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Ron Paul's ideas are the kind of shit that got us into this mess.
Care to elaborate?

Big goverment is better than small goverment?
Laize-Faire doesn't really work k. It lets the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Regulation is a necesity so companies can't fuck the small man over. You get your holidays and 40 hour weeks and mininum wage due to the evils of socialism. Want laize-faire? Go to China, great country that is.
You don't seem to realize that what Obama is doing right now bring you more and more close to the Chinese system.

Do i look like a socialist?  (and no national socialist joke plz)
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6419|North Carolina

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:


Care to elaborate?

Big goverment is better than small goverment?
Laize-Faire doesn't really work k. It lets the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Regulation is a necesity so companies can't fuck the small man over. You get your holidays and 40 hour weeks and mininum wage due to the evils of socialism. Want laize-faire? Go to China, great country that is.
You don't seem to realize that what Obama is doing right now bring you more and more close to the Chinese system.

Do i look like a socialist?  (and no national socialist joke plz)
Obama's policies are actually more European in nature.  China is a different direction altogether.
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6212

Turquoise wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Cybargs wrote:


Laize-Faire doesn't really work k. It lets the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Regulation is a necesity so companies can't fuck the small man over. You get your holidays and 40 hour weeks and mininum wage due to the evils of socialism. Want laize-faire? Go to China, great country that is.
You don't seem to realize that what Obama is doing right now bring you more and more close to the Chinese system.

Do i look like a socialist?  (and no national socialist joke plz)
Obama's policies are actually more European in nature.  China is a different direction altogether.
Goverment taking control over private businesses and banks.. if it is how Europe does it, both Europe and America are dangerously leaning toward full socialism/communism.

i dunno what all this will be like in 5 years but the goverment is bigger and bigger with every move Obama makes.

The goal of Obama is to close the gap between the rich and the poor. Take from the wealthy and give to the poor.  Add to that massive interventionist from the state and we have the perfect mix for a socialist/communist state.   I don't say it will happen overnignt but the general direction is there..   But i may be paranoid too

Why not just follow the constitution..  that piece of paper is gold goddamnit
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6730

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:


You don't seem to realize that what Obama is doing right now bring you more and more close to the Chinese system.

Do i look like a socialist?  (and no national socialist joke plz)
Obama's policies are actually more European in nature.  China is a different direction altogether.
Goverment taking control over private businesses and banks.. if it is how Europe does it, both Europe and America are dangerously leaning toward full socialism/communism.

i dunno what all this will be like in 5 years but the goverment is bigger and bigger with every move Obama makes.

The goal of Obama is to close the gap between the rich and the poor. Take from the wealthy and give to the poor.  Add to that massive interventionist from the state and we have the perfect mix for a socialist/communist state.   I don't say it will happen overnignt but the general direction is there..   But i may be paranoid too

Why not just follow the constitution..  that piece of paper is gold goddamnit
Just because it's on the constitution doesn't mean it's right. The emancipation proclomation was unconstitutional, the new deal was unconstitutional, desegregation of the military could also be deemed unconstitutional.

The bailout money the companies were begging for it. It's not like they go OH NOES GUVMENT ARE BUYING OUR STOCKS WERE FUCKED. They are the ones asking for it. And sometimes a bigger government is better, just look at Europe FFS. I dissagree with a lot of shit Obama does and the rediculous amount of money being spent but, saying big gov is bad coz its big is just retarded.

What's wrong with socialism anyway, zomgs government helping the people, were gonna be dependent by the cut throat gov, SHIT WERE GONNA GET FUCKED OVER LIKE THE CANADIANS.

GG National Socialist member, you have failed once again.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6212

Cybargs wrote:

The bailout money the companies were begging for it. It's not like they go OH NOES GUVMENT ARE BUYING OUR STOCKS WERE FUCKED. They are the ones asking for it.
Hmm ok u are like 12 or something?  I can't believe i'm replying to you.. but ok  you say that since the companies were asking for it, it is not a take over?  You need to realize that what the goverment take, the goverment rarely give back..  Those bailouts are just the tip of the iceberg. Just wait and see, your messiah Obama will do more miracle.

Cybargs wrote:

What's wrong with socialism anyway,
You will find out when you get older kid...

Cybargs wrote:

GG National Socialist member, you have failed once again.
GG Religious sect member, i'm done with you.. you are not worthy of my replies anymore.
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6482

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Ron Paul's ideas are the kind of shit that got us into this mess.
Care to elaborate?

Big goverment is better than small goverment?
I already directed you to Calvin Coolidge.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6419|North Carolina

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:


You don't seem to realize that what Obama is doing right now bring you more and more close to the Chinese system.

Do i look like a socialist?  (and no national socialist joke plz)
Obama's policies are actually more European in nature.  China is a different direction altogether.
Goverment taking control over private businesses and banks.. if it is how Europe does it, both Europe and America are dangerously leaning toward full socialism/communism.

i dunno what all this will be like in 5 years but the goverment is bigger and bigger with every move Obama makes.

The goal of Obama is to close the gap between the rich and the poor. Take from the wealthy and give to the poor.  Add to that massive interventionist from the state and we have the perfect mix for a socialist/communist state.   I don't say it will happen overnignt but the general direction is there..   But i may be paranoid too

Why not just follow the constitution..  that piece of paper is gold goddamnit
You live in Canada, right?  Canada is more "socialist" than America.  They have considerably more protectionism in their markets than we do.  They even have cultural protectionism (quotas for native artists in their media, like radio).  They also have more extensive social programs than America.

While I appreciate your reverence for the Constitution, it is a living document.  We've amended it through the years, and in all likelihood, we'll amend it more in the future.  The Founding Fathers were way ahead of their time, but they were still human.

In the grand scheme of things, Obama is actually pretty moderate.  Our political Left is far less socialist than most of Europe, or even Canada for that matter.  The fact that we're leaning left now is mostly a result of Bush leaning right before him.  These things happen in cycles.  In another 8 years, we'll probably lean right again.
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6212

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Ron Paul's ideas are the kind of shit that got us into this mess.
Care to elaborate?

Big goverment is better than small goverment?
I already directed you to Calvin Coolidge.
I have problem to get your point, do you imply that Coolidge did a good job or not? Was he more like Paul or Obama? I didnt know him but i read the link, looks like he was more like Paul on the foreign policy.  Did he increase the size of goverment?
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6482

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:


Care to elaborate?

Big goverment is better than small goverment?
I already directed you to Calvin Coolidge.
I have problem to get your point, do you imply that Coolidge did a good job or not? Was he more like Paul or Obama? I didnt know him but i read the link, looks like he was more like Paul on the foreign policy.  Did he increase the size of goverment?
Coolidge was the reason we had the great depression. He completely deregulated the economy, being an absolute believer in Laize-Faire. The kind of lack of government oversight that Coolidge brought and Paul wants is what causes the kind of "roller coaster" economy that we saw in the 1920s and are seeing know. With the regulation and safety nets that Obama is putting into place, you end up with an economy that is more stable, one where it might be harder to become a billionaire, but it's also allot harder to create an economy based on lies and money-on-paper like what causes both the great depression, and the current recession.

tl;dr, you and Ron Paul ought to learn history.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5599

Tariffs
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6212

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

With the regulation and safety nets that Obama is putting into place, you end up with an economy that is more stable...
You may think that the economy is more stable but once you will realize the kind of debt and deficit Obama will leave to your children, you will maybe change your mind. And i don't talk about him destroying your dollar.

Good luck with all of that..
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6212

Turquoise wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Obama's policies are actually more European in nature.  China is a different direction altogether.
Goverment taking control over private businesses and banks.. if it is how Europe does it, both Europe and America are dangerously leaning toward full socialism/communism.

i dunno what all this will be like in 5 years but the goverment is bigger and bigger with every move Obama makes.

The goal of Obama is to close the gap between the rich and the poor. Take from the wealthy and give to the poor.  Add to that massive interventionist from the state and we have the perfect mix for a socialist/communist state.   I don't say it will happen overnignt but the general direction is there..   But i may be paranoid too

Why not just follow the constitution..  that piece of paper is gold goddamnit
You live in Canada, right?  Canada is more "socialist" than America.  They have considerably more protectionism in their markets than we do.  They even have cultural protectionism (quotas for native artists in their media, like radio).  They also have more extensive social programs than America.

While I appreciate your reverence for the Constitution, it is a living document.  We've amended it through the years, and in all likelihood, we'll amend it more in the future.  The Founding Fathers were way ahead of their time, but they were still human.

In the grand scheme of things, Obama is actually pretty moderate.  Our political Left is far less socialist than most of Europe, or even Canada for that matter.  The fact that we're leaning left now is mostly a result of Bush leaning right before him.  These things happen in cycles.  In another 8 years, we'll probably lean right again.
Yea i live in Canada.. and productivity is at an all time low.. Socialism bring the worst out of people.. it promote lazyness.. Doesnt matter what you do with your life, the state will take care of you..  Doesnt matter if you work 80h a week, the state will take more than half of your money because they need it for welfare and free healthcare.  Doenst matter if you don't get educated, the worst that will happen is that you make 20K a year with no income tax and that is almost the same amount of money if you go to college and earn 45K a year.. you both end up with 20K in your pockets.

Work your ass off and get the same money that the guy who work 20h a week.

That is socialism for a population of 30 millions..

I afraid of what socialism would look like for a population of 300 millions and add to that a porous border and millions of illegals.

Maybe it will work out well for you, i cannot predict the future..  But socialism pisses me off up here sometimes. 

Personnal responsability is gone.

Edit: One more thing, socialism cost a lot of money, i don't think that Socialism and interventionism works well together.. and since i don't see you guys stopping the interventionist foreign policy, i think it this is just the beginning of huge deficits.

Last edited by AutralianChainsaw (2009-05-31 13:58:24)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6419|North Carolina

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:


I already directed you to Calvin Coolidge.
I have problem to get your point, do you imply that Coolidge did a good job or not? Was he more like Paul or Obama? I didnt know him but i read the link, looks like he was more like Paul on the foreign policy.  Did he increase the size of goverment?
Coolidge was the reason we had the great depression. He completely deregulated the economy, being an absolute believer in Laize-Faire. The kind of lack of government oversight that Coolidge brought and Paul wants is what causes the kind of "roller coaster" economy that we saw in the 1920s and are seeing know. With the regulation and safety nets that Obama is putting into place, you end up with an economy that is more stable, one where it might be harder to become a billionaire, but it's also allot harder to create an economy based on lies and money-on-paper like what causes both the great depression, and the current recession.

tl;dr, you and Ron Paul ought to learn history.
While Coolidge did plenty of damage, Harding is generally blamed more, but for basically the same reasons.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard