Poll

30 STs verus 15 PACs

30 Stealth Tanks34%34% - 12
15 Planetary Assault Carrier65%65% - 23
Total: 35
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6506
https://www.cncden.com/cnc3_scrin/planetaryassultcarrier.jpg https://www.cncden.com/cnc3_nodunits_new/nod_stealth.jpg

The Stealth Tank is priced at 1500 credits, armed with two rocket salvos each capable of firing 8 surface-air/surface-surface rockets which can be upgraded with Tiberium Cores to increase damage, is the fastest and most agile armored vehicle ever made and of course is >98% invisible from over 30 meters.

The Planetary Assault is priced at 3000 credits, armed with 10 mini-fighters that each have a high-heat plasma cannon effective versus tanks and air-craft, can be upgraded with a force-shield that can deflect a certain amount of damage before having to power-down and recharge. The PAC can also generate a small ion-storm which not only shoots lighting at foes but also boosts the attack power of the ship. The PAC also has advanced scanners which render even Nod's most advanced stealth tech useless.

So if the two are each the other's natural enemy, which one would likely win?
Ultimatrox
Member
+38|6271|Netherlands
Unless the one with the Stealth tank has an incredible micro to make full use of the agility of the stealth tank and evade the PAC, he would win for sure.
If the Stealth tank controller is a total nub on the other hand, easy win for the PAC
-
Eldu
Member
+62|6145|Belgium
Lol, stealth tank lose instantly, don't even think insane micro will save you there.
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6605|NYC / Hamburg

Planetary Assault Carriers. They rape hard
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
Mutantbear
Semi Constructive Criticism
+1,431|6003|London, England

siege tanks and carriers, i like starcraft
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ https://i.imgur.com/Xj4f2.png
Ryan
Member
+1,230|6881|Alberta, Canada

Don't know what those are but the red one looks pownage.
Brasso
member
+1,549|6668

Mutantsteak wrote:

siege tanks and carriers, i like starcraft
siege tanks = no air attack

HYDRAS AND GUARDIANS!
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
HurricaИe
Banned
+877|5999|Washington DC
Definitely PACs. If the Scrin player sucks though, then the stealth tanks. Those things can rape face when they surprise the enemy.
Tetrino
International OMGWTFBBQ
+200|6769|Uhh... erm...
With a good micro-ing of the Stealth Tanks, the PACs would fall. It's all down to the commander.



Stealth Tanks are seriously though.
Bernadictus
Moderator
+1,055|6775

The PAC would fail if you can pick them of one at a time.
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6506
Well my uber-mirco with STs has never failed against even the largest PAC fleets. The trick is to count the rockets about to hit the thing and judge whether or not the rockets that have been fired will kill the thing. If yes then move on to the next ship, that way your rockets won't hit nothing and you won't have to wait for the ST's long reload time. However if you don't micro them the PAC fleet would win. Since it is about micro I nulled.
Kommander_Kale
Genetically Modified
+19|6453|Melbourne, Australia
Stealth tanks win very easily. No stealth detection means you can take them however you want. Stanks absolutely cane PAC's in the first place, but since the vast majority of people clump their PACs, the splash on stank bullets puts them out of commission very very quickly. Scenario 2, they're spread apart, you use planning mode, have 2 stanks fire at each separate PAC, gg no re. Ratio of 2 stanks can easily take one pac.
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6506
Yeah, I tried it out and the Stealth Tanks won.
Kommander_Kale
Genetically Modified
+19|6453|Melbourne, Australia
Xd

Last edited by Kommander_Kale (2008-03-27 19:51:41)

Undetected_Killer
Le fuck?
+98|6324|FIYAH FIYAH FIYAAAAAAH

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Yeah, I tried it out and the Stealth Tanks won.
lies
Kommander_Kale
Genetically Modified
+19|6453|Melbourne, Australia
Lol get online whenever you want, and I'll convince you.
specialistx2324
hahahahahhaa
+244|6727|arica harbour
PAC with all those jets and that ion storm, virtually unstoppable.
Rosse_modest
Member
+76|6814|Antwerp, Flanders

Undetected_Killer wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Yeah, I tried it out and the Stealth Tanks won.
lies
I sense you are a victim of excessive GDI propaganda exposure, Killer.

Stealth tanks, because they've been my favourite Nod unit since the original Command & Conquer came out.
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|6881|Reykjavík, Iceland.
Stealth Tanks have always been the best unit, in every C&C game they have been in.

I loved them in Renegade too, they were so damn awesome for running over infantry
RDMC
Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!
+736|6603|Area 51
Depends. If the Planetary Assault Carrier is defending then it would win. Just activate the storms, which will power up the ship and its fighter + the shields and bai bai Stealth Tanks, but on the other hand if they have to attack they can't effectively use their storms, since the storm (If I remember correctly) makes sure they are stuck on one place.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard