The Radeon HD 2900XT Is out. You just have to go through the search feature to get to it...

Go here
Then,

Go here
Then,

Last edited by Jello.01 (2007-05-13 23:53:09)
Last edited by Jello.01 (2007-05-13 23:53:09)
It is showing about $410KuSTaV wrote:
Imagine how much its gonna cost. Spare leg anyone?
Last edited by Dangles (2007-05-13 23:50:49)
Here is what it boils down to. If the Radeon HD 2900 XT performed exactly on par with the GeForce 8800 GTS in every game, it would still be a loser because it draws nearly 100 more watts of power, meaning it is very inefficient. The facts are though that it doesn’t even match the 8800 GTS currently. In every game it slides in underperforming compared to the GeForce 8800 GTS 640 MB, and it does it while drawing a lot more power, as much power or more as an 8800 GTX. Not only that, but a GeForce 8800 GTS 640 MB based video card can now be had for up to $70 cheaper than the Radeon HD 2900 XT. I don’t know about you, but a video card that is cheaper, runs a lot faster and draws less energy just seems like the better value to me.
Last edited by M.O.A.B (2007-05-14 13:29:24)
Last edited by Poseidon (2007-05-15 10:59:41)
I wouldn't say never...Poseidon wrote:
I'll stick with my 8800 GTX. ATI will never be up to par with nVidia.
Last edited by ShawN_ (2007-05-14 13:50:04)
Not by a mile, but the 2900 is alot cheaper then the 8800gtx and is still using poor drivers.Pernicious544 wrote:
The 2900 is a piece of shit, 8800 out performs it by a mile
As I saw in different test with some kind of drivers, on Non AA test it beat the 8800GTS with only a little bit and vica versa, but when using AA on with the drivers that ATI deliver it had beaten the GTS by a mile.theknuck wrote:
hmm, more money, more power consumption, and beat out by 8800gts (640mb). kind of a no brainer here. lets move on.