Cause damn it was too easy. I mean it shouldn't be like BF2 hard but hard than 57,000 points... Thats just my opinion. What do you guys think?
- Brizzzer
- Brizzzer
Pages: 1 2
Yep....I got to general in 170 hours.KILLSWITCH wrote:
Christ, there must be loads of Generals running about.
The points are dumbed down though (aside from awards) ... Kills are only worth 1, so are revives... kill assists and driver assists are only 1/2 point each.KILLSWITCH wrote:
I aint a 2142 player but what do you mean...does it take 57,000 points to become the top rank??? If so thats crazy.
Last edited by D34TH_D34L3R (2007-01-28 02:55:55)
Totally agree. Some of you say "It only took me 200 hours"! That's a lot of time to spend on a game if you have a full time job. I suppose it's different for some people but I spent about 210 hours on BF2 and that's the most time I've ever spent on a game and ever want to. It's all good fun but it's nice to 'finish' a game and still have a life (and maybe play a different game at some point this year). I recently bought Gear of War for 360, It took me about 10 hours to finish and some of you say "it only took me 200 Hours" that's 20X the length of Gears of War.Gears was a good game and I was happy with the length of time it took to finish. BF2 required far to much of a time commitment, 2142 is more reasonable IMO.BrknPhoenix wrote:
Perhaps to people that play 10 hours a day it's too fast. To people that have a normal schedule it's reasonable. They thought about the raging hardcore gamer vs. the general player, and the general player won out, as they should. You shouldn't have to dedicate months or years of your life every day just to do well in a game. Sillyness.
Pages: 1 2