Geez what does milk cost in your area, it's hard enough to eat my mini wheaties here.TrollmeaT wrote:
At least it isn't up to the price of milk yet, that's when I'll be bitching.
Search
Search results: 1,405 found, showing up to 50
Well I guess Bush pussied out again. Anyone wanna go over there and do it ourselves?
It's translated off of RussianRidir wrote:
its crap bad grammar towards the bottom of the page.
Geez that's confusing. So Bush was about to be assassinated so by going to Iraq it stopped future attempts? It's so late and I'm confused now.
I will rip your throat out and use it to smoke a kilo...stryyker wrote:
I hope they were brother and sister. That would be awesome.
Who said they won't? Are you under the Bush illusion that we're friends w/ Putin just b/c they shook hands? KTHNXBYEI.M.I Militant wrote:
russia will not attack KTHNXMason4Assassin444 wrote:
Russia is better friends with Iran than they are with us.
Start stocking your canned goods and water.
Well hopefully Obama will be president out of the two (hillary and obama, I haven't really researched the candidates yet. Besides I can't vote b/c I was born in England). But yeah, I've heard about that no declaration thing before but never saw it in concrete words.
I dunno, Castro seemed to do ok and Saddam would've stayed if Bush hadn't gone in. And I mean like look at Bush...SgtHeihn wrote:
If we leave Iran alone for a few years they will implode. Their economy sucks ass, you can only control people for so long then they will rise up.
But see then the entire world would be against us. Don't get me wrong, fufilling the 2012 Aztec prophecy about the end of the world is definately on the top of my list but...DBBrinson1 wrote:
We should do what we did a decade or two ago and sink their entire Navy, and then top it off by blowing up their Nuke facilities.
Well sarcasm aside, the next war I could see the entire world against us. Britain could try to help but if nukes are involved, well, 40 years ago Russia could have wiped half of the U.K. off the physical face of the map. That was about 40 years ago, I'm sure they can wipe the rest off now if they really wanted to especially when they're that close. China I see as the sleeping dragon (punintended) and of course they have close relations w/ Russia. Bush is just trying to break those relations to give him more breathing room in between the two but it's useless right now. This whole operation bite could be propaganda by the Russians to spark something against the US whether it exists or not. I think it's agreed that everyone is under the gentlemen's code here in the fact that no one wants to use nukes but when someone does, everyone else will.
I can see California being the first state to be hit by a nuclear missile from either China or Russia. Either way it doesn't really matter to me, if WWIII does come by anytime soon I'd enlist voluntarily but a frightening fact to me is that one nuke to Washington D.C. could wipe out my town and we're about in the middle of pennsylvania.
Hey man, understandable. The only way that I'll go to war would be via WWIII b/c the cause would be worthwhile but the War on Terror just goes against some of my ideas. I support the troops but not how Bush is going through with this and I feel bad for all the guys who have to go through this Surge just to get the popular vote of the civilians in the middle east. I've thought about joining honestly I have but not for a full time arrangement which is maybe why I'm so wrapped up in this whole "Operation Bite" thing.SgtHeihn wrote:
If this does happen both my roommate and I would be recalled and my ass would be stuck in the desert again. Don't get me wrong, I am very pro American, but I would be in Canada. The world would not go along with it, the EU, the UN and everybody would impose sanction on us.xX[Elangbam]Xx wrote:
Well I don't think that the U.S. would be planning on anything after this supposed operation. That Russian guys says that the US wants to postpone any further Iranian improvements in nuclear warfare. Bombing 20 sites for 12 straight hours should do the trick. Besides, what does Iran have? Mig-21s still? But anyway, I don't know how Bush would think he would get away with this even if the Russians didn't find this. If this does happen you all have to kiss my feet but if it doesn't well...I'm just a patsy.
Ah yes the whole Congress and war funds, Bush seems to be alone when he wanted to veto any of Congress's anti war decisions.Kmarion wrote:
Honestly who really can say in the long run. But I can say anyone who believes that a mass sneak attack by the United States is going to happen really has no idea on how our government works. (I point to what is currently happening in Congress and war funding). Remember who ultimately sends us to war, who the majority in congress is, and what must happen to approve military force. I would hope after the last conflict Americans have a clearer understanding of what an immediate threat is.ATG wrote:
An attack on Iran by any other name then?Kmarion wrote:
ATG none of those have anything to do with "Operation Bite". We have already discussed the "Plans". It would take the Pentagon at least 3-4 months to develop any kind of real strategy for Iran. I'm pretty sure there are plans drawn up for even the most unlikely scenario already. Iran just had a major victory and have now come off as both compassionate and strong. The EU could have taken it to the next level and put a strain on the already hurting economy of Iran. Iran imports 40 percent of it's goods from the EU. Don't completely toss out the effectiveness of sanctions/trade restrictions. Ahmadinejad might think they can stay isolated from the world indefinitely, but his country's unemployment and inflation will eventually think differently.
That the Roosky would know even the name of the Operation, bah.
That the operation is planned, mmm hmmn.
Well I don't think that the U.S. would be planning on anything after this supposed operation. That Russian guys says that the US wants to postpone any further Iranian improvements in nuclear warfare. Bombing 20 sites for 12 straight hours should do the trick. Besides, what does Iran have? Mig-21s still? But anyway, I don't know how Bush would think he would get away with this even if the Russians didn't find this. If this does happen you all have to kiss my feet but if it doesn't well...I'm just a patsy.
Lol it's been like 6 months and you still haven't changed
The only thing that makes me want to believe it is that Russian guy, he seems legit although I'm not sure if there's any proof that he actually said that. If this worked out it would be like this (USE YOUR IMAGINATION, I'M USING MINE HERE):
The surge was just a fake move to put troops in Iraq but really Bush wants to attack Iran on the side. The aerial attack would take out Iran and then the troops would move in.
That's the only way that I see this coming true...I would slap myself 20 times if that came true
The surge was just a fake move to put troops in Iraq but really Bush wants to attack Iran on the side. The aerial attack would take out Iran and then the troops would move in.
That's the only way that I see this coming true...I would slap myself 20 times if that came true
I have no idea, like I said I don't think it's going to happen b/c of multiple reasons, I just figured more people would've heard about it b/c I heard it in school then I googled it and found that.Jet Blast wrote:
I know dude. But why wouldn't CNN, BBC, FOx, etc. run with this story?xX[Elangbam]Xx wrote:
If u read the whole thing you'd see that rense is only the interpreter. This I'm guessing is the main site http://fr.rian.ru/world/20070319/62260006.html which would later be babbelized.
If u read the whole thing you'd see that rense is only the interpreter. This I'm guessing is the main site http://fr.rian.ru/world/20070319/62260006.html which would later be babbelized.
I have no idea how they got hold of it b/c Ivakox ;la or w/e that Russian guy says that the info was handed down from GRU.
http://todbrilliant.com/us-to-attack-iran-april-6/
http://www.revereradio.net/e107/news.php?item.203.15
http://digtheheavy.wordpress.com/2007/0 … r-tarpley/
http://9rules.com/politics/notes/2916/
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? … 2FShowFull
http://opinionist.com/2007/03/29/russia … n-april-6/
http://groups.google.com/group/can.gene … bbeb68e0f7
http://www.nowpublic.com/russian_genera … an_april_6
Are other sites...they're not BBC or Al Jezeera but hey you do with what you have
EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT
Actually according to Wikipedia and other articles (yeah forget Wiki) the Russian General reported this late in January so it isn't that recent. I'm not sure where the April 6 came from though b/c I'm just seeing him saying somewhere late in April. I guess I must be missing something.
http://www.revereradio.net/e107/news.php?item.203.15
http://digtheheavy.wordpress.com/2007/0 … r-tarpley/
http://9rules.com/politics/notes/2916/
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? … 2FShowFull
http://opinionist.com/2007/03/29/russia … n-april-6/
http://groups.google.com/group/can.gene … bbeb68e0f7
http://www.nowpublic.com/russian_genera … an_april_6
Are other sites...they're not BBC or Al Jezeera but hey you do with what you have
EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT
Actually according to Wikipedia and other articles (yeah forget Wiki) the Russian General reported this late in January so it isn't that recent. I'm not sure where the April 6 came from though b/c I'm just seeing him saying somewhere late in April. I guess I must be missing something.
The U.S. didn't tell, or else the story goes. I guess Russia can pick up intel (we can too you know) on this somehow.SgtHeihn wrote:
Do I smell conspiracy theory?? Why would the US tell Russia about an attack on one of its major buisness partners?
Well do you guys think that this Operation will continue, was it even real or will it be moved to a surprise date? There's US warships and what not in the Persian Gulf already.
Just look up April 6 Iran on google and you'll get other sites. Most sites lead to this though. It may just be a rumor but it's popping up all over the place.Jet Blast wrote:
WTF is rense.com?
http://www.rense.com/general75/bite.htm
Discuss:
I basically think that this operation will not be executed b/c obviously the cover was blown. The source seems to be a Russian official of high stature so I doubt he's lieing b/c God knows the Russians can tap into our information.
Discuss:
I basically think that this operation will not be executed b/c obviously the cover was blown. The source seems to be a Russian official of high stature so I doubt he's lieing b/c God knows the Russians can tap into our information.
Lol, knew that would get your attention. No offense, I'm asian too but anyway.
Found this interesting movie, as in pretty funny pretty gut busting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giAy8wEv … mp;search=
If you've ever felt this way after getting a bad grade, you're not alone.
Found this interesting movie, as in pretty funny pretty gut busting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giAy8wEv … mp;search=
If you've ever felt this way after getting a bad grade, you're not alone.
Lol, this guy doesn't have a dick. ROFLChief_(OwNaGe) wrote:
Why?avman633 wrote:
i dont give a fuck about his e-penis, you shud think about getting a real penis firstChief_(OwNaGe) wrote:
Go away before he wacks you with his e-penis that is about nine hundred and twenty inches bigger than yours.
Does anyone know which is easier to edit on the computer?
HDD or MiniDV?
I'm stuck between these two:
http://www.quixtar.com/products/product … o=715773A6
and http://www.quixtar.com/products/product … o=715850A6
HDD or MiniDV?
I'm stuck between these two:
http://www.quixtar.com/products/product … o=715773A6
and http://www.quixtar.com/products/product … o=715850A6
Which one should I get out of these:
http://www.quixtar.com/products/thumbna … amp;Page=1
Help would be appreciated.
Not sure if I want MiniDV of HDD
http://www.quixtar.com/products/thumbna … amp;Page=1
Help would be appreciated.
Not sure if I want MiniDV of HDD
How many non port games have yo played?Des.Kmal wrote:
fucking right, shit, ps3 had like 12 fps throughout all the games i played. made me want to go home and put my settings on all high, 16aa and 18af just to relive the ps3 failure.Kmarion wrote:
but the Xbox 360 games generally offered better framerates too.
It's not a $100 loss fool. Sony, IBM and someto other company spent billions developing the Cell. What's the cell? The PS3 processor. Also, BluRay does cost alot if you haven't noticed which is why they're low on production at the moment. This add up to something way over you r head.golgoj4 wrote:
+1Vilham wrote:
Its a $100 loss, which is less than the original xbox lost on each unit. As many have said before in support of the xbox, the profit is made from game contracts and gaming equipment, the same applies to the PS3, we won't have any fucking double standards here, it just makes you look stupid.TheDarkRaven wrote:
For the love of...
Let me EDUCATE you a bit.
The PS3 is selling at roughly a $500 loss. The Blu-Ray in the PS3 is incomparable to stand-alone players (it's practically useless - please get a stand-alone if you even LIKE Blu-Ray). Also, Blu-Ray is definitely inferior and more expensive than HD-DVD (hell, DVD may survive these two formats) and thus will fail. Sony just can't market new products well anymore...it's a shame. They WERE a good company but they've lost it all. I can see them going bankrupt within the next decade and with what they're doing at the moment, I can't really say I'll miss them.
So launch games usually have the best graphics? I learn something new everyday.
btw: Motorstorm is better than any racing game right now. That is, until F1 comes out
btw: Motorstorm is better than any racing game right now. That is, until F1 comes out
Hey, so this Christmas I want to get a digital camcorder. I don't know much about them so I'm up for suggestions.
The only requisites I have are:
-DVD not Min-DV or w/e
-Good quality
-extras and connectivity
-good brand name
Thanks
The only requisites I have are:
-DVD not Min-DV or w/e
-Good quality
-extras and connectivity
-good brand name
Thanks
It's amazing and still hasn't been topped by anthing so far, not even video games can match it. The realism is intense and brutal as it should be.
You know the irony in that? We just had fish sticks for dinner (that and other stuff though)Fenris_GreyClaw wrote:
http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j34/N … ce889b.gifxX[Elangbam]Xx wrote:
http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/4110 … 009ye8.jpg
Good job on the Expert!
http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j34/N … yStick.jpg
Knifejkohlc wrote:
lol wth is bitch slapped?
I will get so pissed. Look at this pic:
See that guy I killed? pvt.m@dcap?
Well, they updated his death streak to 32 but not his worst enemy. Who's that? Me.
I killed him probably around 25+ but less than 32 b/c some other sniper was getting him. He was idle on arty island so I swam up and decided to do some target practice.
See that guy I killed? pvt.m@dcap?
Well, they updated his death streak to 32 but not his worst enemy. Who's that? Me.
I killed him probably around 25+ but less than 32 b/c some other sniper was getting him. He was idle on arty island so I swam up and decided to do some target practice.
It's possible and it will eventually happen. Look at all the robots that are being made in Japan. Just look it up on YouTube.
Personally, I want a Gundam. Even if it costs 500 trillion dollars
Personally, I want a Gundam. Even if it costs 500 trillion dollars
He still plays on 1.4 with me. You just type in 24/7 wake and it's the only 1.4 64 Wake server out there. Needless to say he tips the scales
Wow, you guys are serious jerks
Did you find this pic via google or something?
Did you find this pic via google or something?
I believe that the IRA are patriots and you can hate me for that. Britain has tried to conquer the world and they still have Northern Ireland. Is that fair? No it isn't but it's the best that Ireland could get. Do some research on Michael Collins and see what he did for Ireland. If you don't understand it all just watch the movie (Liam Neeson, Alan Rickman, Julia Roberts).
Lol, well I'm hoping for the following to update:killer21 wrote:
Is that all?
-42 kill streak
-New Victim with like 29+ kills (he was idle on arty island so I just swam over and said hi)
Unfortunately, I'm not sure if they will update the 42 kill streak b/c they only updated it to 36 (which I got today pure sniping, no claymores either)
They haven't put up the new victim and I can barely remember his name. It's lie pvt. mad or something like that.
I'm not the type of sniper that uses claymores willy nilly. Usually its a last line of defense when you know you're screwed. Say at the south end of Wake there's 4 boats coming and you only manage to shoot out 1...yeah, that type of screwed.
3.00 K/D WITH SNIPER RIFLE!!!!!!!!!
xXIElangbamIXx
xXIElangbamIXx
PS3 owns, enough said, end of story, Xbots can go to hell
What the hell did I spell wrongdubbs wrote:
Even tough EA is an American company, Dice who created the game, and coded it, is from Sweden. The patches come from Dice in Canada. Other the EA (who recently completely bought Dice) who published it, there is nothing American about BF2. So your vote should be Japan wins over Sweden, not America. Also, if it was not for America rebuilding Japan after WWII, and Texas Instrument creating the transistor, then you would not have Sony. Therefore you would not have a PS3.xX[Elangbam]Xx wrote:
Lol, most of the technological stuff you get is japanese. I don't see you smashing that. Either way, Japan wins my vote over america after the crap that is....Battlefield 2Mongoose wrote:
lol tahst what they get for buyting something japenese
BTW, if America did not invent the transistor, you would still be using vacuum tubes.
PS: I was told to give you the following:
xX[Elangbam]Xx,
Please start using me, I am your friend.
Thank You,
Spell Checker.
they don't call the PS3 total immersion for nothingeagles1106 wrote:
Wow, I havent heard of that until now. Are you fucking kidding me? People need to grasp a sense of reality, jesus.xX[Elangbam]Xx wrote:
right on with you on that one. This has probably been the most ferocious launch i've ever seen. Guy getting shot, one guy being charged of rape, one 19 yr old w/ a dislocated jaweagles1106 wrote:
I wanted to stroll up to Best Buy and rip the tents down of the nerds who actually camped a week without bathing in front of an Electronics Store for a VIDEO GAME SYSTEM.
I will buy the Ps3 eventually, but I'm not that retarded to sit in front of a store in a tent for an entire week (probably without bathing either).
Crap, i thought that Venom was deemed a fake months ago. Never saw it in a trailer. Is this the one at Casino Royale?
right on with you on that one. This has probably been the most ferocious launch i've ever seen. Guy getting shot, one guy being charged of rape, one 19 yr old w/ a dislocated jaweagles1106 wrote:
I wanted to stroll up to Best Buy and rip the tents down of the nerds who actually camped a week without bathing in front of an Electronics Store for a VIDEO GAME SYSTEM.
I will buy the Ps3 eventually, but I'm not that retarded to sit in front of a store in a tent for an entire week (probably without bathing either).
Oh yeah, the controllers are like bluetooth or wifi or w/e its called. All you have to know is....that well, you can go really far, i mean over 20 feet far with a clear signal. Don't know what good that is, but hey, maybe you'll be blown away when you turn it on that you'll be back like 25 feet.
Either way, MGS4 is going to be hte game that i'm looking forward too. Hell, when the next big shipment in february or march or w/e comes, i'll probably be typing here (if i even come here again) via PS3
Either way, MGS4 is going to be hte game that i'm looking forward too. Hell, when the next big shipment in february or march or w/e comes, i'll probably be typing here (if i even come here again) via PS3
Wii is Xbox graphics, same overall specsOmnideath wrote:
wii is said to be about 3 times more powerful than the gamecube as compared to xbox 360 and ps3 which are supposed to be way way more powerful thatn the previous generations which means wii graphics wont be as good as them.LT.Victim wrote:
How are the graphics on the Wii, are they like the same as the PS3..
Because before Xbox and Playstations graphics owned nintendos for a few years.
-PS3 is deemed the better resolution b/c it can go up to 1080p
-360 played the catchup game to the PS3 in a recent update to 1080P...too bad no games support it