Thus freedom is not, and has not, been fully achieved.CC-Marley wrote:
Even freedom needs rules..
Search
Search results: 323 found, showing up to 50
Similar problems - everything was running fine, then suddenly repeated initialization failures. Manually updated PB, not helped.
Worst experience was when I was talking with a friend about food, and I mention Lamb. He turns around and says, "Isnt that a type of goat?"
I cant imagine it would be very much fun playing the game knowing that your faction eventually gets owned :pAWSMFOX wrote:
COD game from Nazi's point of view would be great.
Dunno, never died
COD2 had some good ones, like "the death of one is a tradegy - the death of a milliion is a statistic" ~ Stalin
COD2 had some good ones, like "the death of one is a tradegy - the death of a milliion is a statistic" ~ Stalin
the guy who is rapping is one of the black USA soldiers in your squad through the latter half of the game btw.
shit would fly in oh so many directionsxRBLx wrote:
wow, what would have happen is they did...
Agreed, it would make little impact on me if the Scottish became independant, and if they really want independance, let them have it. Dunno why some English people have a desire to keep the UK completely unified in all honesty, Scotlands not exactly a desirable place to live unless you enjoyed being stabbed
Im more in favour of a greater focus on the Commonwealth, so that whilst we still hold an influence over say Scotland and Wales, they would be more free and have greater independance.
Im more in favour of a greater focus on the Commonwealth, so that whilst we still hold an influence over say Scotland and Wales, they would be more free and have greater independance.
Ive been drinking since I was 18, and Im not a raging alcoholic. Admittadely, you will get a whole section of society (i.e chavs) who deserve to get liver poisining, and are going the right way, but it sucks that you have to be 21 to drink. Oh well, makes me appreciate being British a little bit moreDBBrinson1 wrote:
The drinking age at one time was lowered to 18. It apparently was a mess and apparently 18 year olds couldn't keep the politicians in power sympathetic to their plight. So drinking age went back to 21.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
because they should be able to put their own life on the line to be cool as wellMAGUIRE93 wrote:
i agree. If someone is willing to put there life in the line for his or her country they should be able to drink.
Harry Potter
Interesting choice of music, although I cant say I rate the video very mutch.
Im really getting into the G36C/RDS with Stopping Power and Deep Impact and have been getting good results...
song name please?
also, very cool
also, very cool
Liked the second vid, but tbh you deserved to be killed in that crate with that kind of knifing
Is it ironic how it is said how racist those Russians are, when compared to the fact that in both the UK and America, there are still those who hold racist views? Especially considering that until 50 years ago, Black people were subjugated to extreme segregation and abuse on a national scale in America - It is hipocritical how one faction should be entitled to an experience whereby they can learn and give "equal" rights, yet Russia can't. Leave them alone, let them sort their own problems. How woud you react if the Russians turned around and started interefering with the US/EU?
Well, think about it. Labour just got completely pulverised in the latest opinion polls, Brown was bound to do something "outrageous" to try and look as though hes doing productive things for this country. Obviously, he fails, but sadly we dont have anyone worth voting in anymore... Brown is a very poor leader, especially compared to Blair. Cameron fails on epic proportions and who even knows the name of the last party? Lib something?
To be honest, I think you would have to look very hard to find someone filled with more shit than this guy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thomp … ttorney%29
/sarcasm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thomp … ttorney%29
I agree, this video game made this guy murder peoplewikipedia wrote:
In September 2006, Thompson filed a suit in Albuquerque, New Mexico against Sony, Take-Two, Rockstar Games, and Cody Posey, for the wrongful death of three members of Posey's family. The 69-page complaint filed by Thompson and Albuquerque attorney Steven Sanders argued that "obsessively" playing Grand Theft Auto: Vice City made violence "pleasurable and attractive," disconnected violence from consequences, and caused Posey to "act out, copycat, replicate and emulate the violence" when he shot and killed his father, stepmother, and stepsister, and then buried them under a manure pile at a ranch owned by former ABC News reporter Sam Donaldson in July, 2004. Thompson and Sanders filed the lawsuit on behalf of the surviving family members of Posey's father
/sarcasm
yeh i think so, if you check out the challenge section it shows the req. and it includes playing against 4(?) other playersTheAussieReaper wrote:
Orly?syndicat111 wrote:
I believe you need to come in the top 3 competing against 4 other players. May be slightly more, but there are few servers that stay that empty anyway.
If you get into a crowded server the best to way make it into the top 3 is have consistent airstrikes. Then shoot down enemy choppers to call your own.
I believe you need to come in the top 3 competing against 4 other players. May be slightly more, but there are few servers that stay that empty anyway.
Masques wrote:
TDM overgrown or downpour seem to be the best. I personally completed the challenge on downpour, but have since gotten 5+ mounted MG kills on overgrown.mtb0minime wrote:
Oh yeah and I still need 5 kill streak on a planted MG. Any tips for that? (map, server size, game mode, etc.)
(sorry for bad quality in this picture)
Backlot also works, go for the MG in the corner shop rather than the MG in the Construction Site.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7351399.stm
Could this be the beginning of a new, super era of technology on the battlefield?
Could this be the beginning of a new, super era of technology on the battlefield?
-"Prophesized by our prophet muhammed?" Poor expression tbh"Very soon, Allah willing, Rome will be conquered, just like Constantinople was, as was prophesized by our prophet Muhammad,"
Managed to do that on Bloc, where a guy was sniping from the top of the stairs that overlooks the middle section of the map... From one of the apartments, where you come out of the door under the ledge, I sprayed up through the small wall and hit his clay, killing himsteelie34 wrote:
the c4 one isnt too tough if you play alot of sabotage. someone always seems to booby trap their base, and since its a spawn spot, you just gotta camp it and kill someone if they walk by their own c4.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Got my golden svd. Working towards gold m60 at the moment.
As for the other challenges, I've only got to get invincible (thinks thats 5 health regens in a row) along with shooting a claymore through a wall with deep impact to set of an enemy explosive device and kill a bad guy. No idea how I'm gunna get that last one, other than luck.
Also I think shoot enemy c4, which is really hard cause nobody uses it. lol
the shooting through the wall though, is damn near impossible... anyone done that?
Original poll, completed everything bar smg and assault
Servers that make you go around in crouch mode all the time are just retarded needless to say, I got banned pretty quick
most annoying thing is the calls for prayer at like 5:30am... but not all mosques use loudspeakers to tell each other the time
Nah, I didnt really enjoy it so much. Funniest scene is the first imaginationland when Ronald McDonald picks his arm up Saving Private Ryan style hahah
Been a disapointing season so far, especially compared to the wonders of *imaginationland*
So not a nation.wrote:
(The) EU functioning involves a hybrid of intergovernmentalism and supranationalism. In certain areas it depends upon agreement between the member states, an intergovernmental feature common to most international organisations.[6] In economic areas it has established supranational bodies, able to make decisions without the agreement of members common to souvereign countries
So doesnt belong on the list.
Of course Germany was a superpower, you berk, Hitler had managed to take over a vast amount of land in just a few short years! At the start of WW2, Germany, the UK and Russia were the primary superpowers. At the end, the UK / German economy had been crippled (hence the loss of the British Empire, we effectively sold the countries their independance) which left the self-interested Russia and the Imperialist America. By 1950, USA held about a 1/3 of the world economy - hence thats the reason why the US became a superpower.†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
Nazi Germany wasnt a Superpower there are only 2 Superpowers and they US and the former Soviet Union. Falklands proved what they could fire a torpedo at a ship? I believe that the British got their butts handed to them turning the first half of WW2 in Africa where the SAS got alot of their victories. Also i wouldn't believe everything you see and hear about the SAS on video games most people over hype them. Fine you can believe COD as SAS history LOL.jord wrote:
That's because:†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
SAS are overrated though ive never seen them fight a "true" superpower not just 3rd world countries lol.
A. You haven't seen them at all.
B. Nazi's in World War 2.
C. Falklands.
Not that the marines have ever fought a true "Super power". Whatever the fuck that means.
.I believe that the British got their butts handed to them turning the first half of WW2
You finished talking out of your ass?
On what basis are they overrated?dayarath wrote:
Sorry to dissapoint you but SAS is overrated. The marines are an incredibly strong fighting force, and no 100 man special forces group in the world would be able to stand a chance, if it's jungle warfare I guess they're just going to mow the trees down with 25mm rounds at the start, also 'spraying fire' in a direction where you think enemy forces are is pretty succesfull in wooded areas.
TBH, its a bit of a stretch to say that the second link is "good quality"...
Despite the other comments, I really wasnt prepared for that amount of fail.
Its good to know God is still in contact, telling us what we can and cannot do
Blair suddenly turned Catholic when he was elected because he didnt want his kids to go to state schools, yet he had supposedly put so much effort into making state schools equally as good as public schools.... its all a farce, religion and politics.Mek-Izzle wrote:
Yeah, and I find it odd that legally the UK isn't secular but in reality it's pretty much one of the most secular places in the world. The Politicians here have to be more Athiest if anything, I remember Tony Blair saying how he "hid" his faith from the public (unlike GWB) because people would think he is a nutter, and rightly so. 'Cos religion has no place in politics, and he knows itsergeriver wrote:
Portugal, Spain, Italy and France? Mmmm, no.Mek-Izzle wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_state
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e … larmap.PNG
/Smartass
Brazil and Mexico? I don't think so. Pretty much the Catholic Church says how things are there.
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
thats just it, I dont see the difference between just and wrong. History is written by the victors. If Germany had won, I feel strongly we would have a completely different interpretation of 20th century history.
the people that were trying to kill me in Iraq felt their cause was right and just. They still ended up dead.
Winston Churchill wrote:
History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.
Hypothetically speaking, of courseTurquoise wrote:
That's called thinking logically. Of course, if you do enough of that, you usually don't continue to believe in a religion altogether.syndicat111 wrote:
I dont really get the whole "god gave us this land" routine. Supposing there is a God, it stands to reason that he created the whole world in equal measure. TBH, its like saying "God bless America". Why would this being, capable of creating a Universe want to specifically bless one (relatively) tiny piece of land?
I dont really get the whole "god gave us this land" routine. Supposing there is a God, it stands to reason that he created the whole world in equal measure. TBH, its like saying "God bless America". Why would this being, capable of creating a Universe want to specifically bless one (relatively) tiny piece of land?
Undoubtably some good kills, but I think it would have been better with longer streaks as opposed to individual headshots etc.
But, all in all, good job
But, all in all, good job
persistant lil fucker, aint he?
*clear*
all right buddy, your good to go
all right buddy, your good to go
Dawn of War tbh
Normally I would agree but02fxnmaurer wrote:
get portal ...its cheap and very good ...
i was gonna get medieval 2 total war and expansions ..for 35 quid but asda sell it cheap...
asda is the best place for cheap games in the uk ...its official
http://www.asda-entertainment.co.uk/asd … geNumber=1
http://www.asda-entertainment.co.uk/asd … 04.product
what the hell? Im gonna get Freelancer again just because its so awesome, but you can get it for like £7 of Play.com and £3 on ebay!
One of the pinnacle beliefs include Xenu, the evil galactic superlord, with the help of psychiatrists, convinced most of the universes population to go to him, under the belief it was a tax income inspection. He then proceeds to paralyse said population, throws 'em down a volcano and blows it up with a H-bomb.
Yeh, thats even slightly believable.
Yeh, thats even slightly believable.
This essay (which is worth the time to read, and for the most part impartial) looks at what is and causes resentment towards America, focusing on legitimate and illigitimate standpoints which often spark ill feeling between Europeans and Americans:
http://www.vexen.co.uk/
Another interesting section is the "UK: Success and Failure".
I want to make it clear, Im not intending to start some flame war, I thought Vexens views were interesting.
http://www.vexen.co.uk/
Another interesting section is the "UK: Success and Failure".
I want to make it clear, Im not intending to start some flame war, I thought Vexens views were interesting.
Your talking about it as if you thought it would be a good idea...SenorToenails wrote:
No. It wouldn't.syndicat111 wrote:
Well what do you think a nuclear explosion would do to it? Aside from blow a considerable hole in it, potentially killing due to the debri and screwing tidal patterns in the ass...
The moon has a radius of 1,737.10 km and a mass of 7.3477×10^22 kg. That's large. A single nuclear weapon would not "blow a considerable hole in it" at all. Maybe a crater, but nothing that will really change the moonscape. Think about it logically. It will take a lot of explosives to blow apart the moon. Especially from the surface.
Well what do you think a nuclear explosion would do to it? Aside from blow a considerable hole in it, potentially killing due to the debri and screwing tidal patterns in the ass...
No American plans to blow up the moon to show dominance over Communist Russia.
You have to remember, they were just ideas and were never actually put into motion - its the fact that this idea was explored...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2000/ … heobserver
You have to remember, they were just ideas and were never actually put into motion - its the fact that this idea was explored...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2000/ … heobserver
http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/stories/s127959.htmThe US Air Force developed a top-secret plan to detonate a nuclear bomb on the moon as a display of military might at the height of the Cold War
COMPERE: A physicist in the United States has revealed that in 1958 at the height of the Cold War he was asked by the government to develop a plan to explode a nuclear device on the moon.
Im sorry, I have that from my college stuff on the Cold War - so its a hard copy. Ive been searching for a source, yet unsuccessful... Youll just have to take my word for it, but bear in mind that Nuclear power was a relatively new entity, and as the Communists had beaten the US to space craft (Sputnik), Capitilist dominance needed to be shown.SenorToenails wrote:
Blow up the moon? How? From a surface attack? No way! Give me a source, or that is just bullshit.syndicat111 wrote:
You know, in the Cold War, it was actually planned to blow up the moon after Sputnik was released... it was cancelled because they didnt know where the pieces would land. That is trying to show strength...
Ill keep searching, and will post if I can find a reliable source.
Im not referring just to secrets crucial to the military etc.OrangeHound wrote:
Speaking from personal experience: Yes. That's right.syndicat111 wrote:
Perhaps there are some things the US government might not want anyone else to find out about...?
It could be anything, enough to piss Russia off even more as seen in the U2 incident, where the US said the plane was a weather plane.
My point was not clear - and I dont think that it is another chance to show US strength either, otherwise why such a thin mask for their true intentions? They couldnt just say "classified material" or whatever...
You know, in the Cold War, it was actually planned to blow up the moon after Sputnik was released... it was cancelled because they didnt know where the pieces would land. That is trying to show strength...