nah it'll be crysis then a few expansions and boosters from 2142 then crysis 2 and then another BF game, then maybe crysis 3 or they will move onto something else, the battlefield series moaned and complained about though it is has been played by millions, EA isn't going to give up a money machine like that easily.Ryan wrote:
They are switching to Crysis now. They gave up on the BF series long ago.
Search
Search results: 1,110 found, showing up to 50
anyone else think the 1942 planes were much better to fly?Smitty5613 wrote:
Coral SeaLongbow wrote:
Midway Island ?shoot2kill500 wrote:
They used to have exacly that for bf1942, 2 carriers and just a bunch of island inbetween (so u couldnt move the carriers towards each other, back when u could) im at a loss for the name of the map thou...but the point is its a tired idea.
I mean the bf2 jets are cooler (apart from the spitfire that things owns all) but i reckon the much slower planes of 1942 we're more balanced, not to mention the AA was better, non of that lock on crap and flak guns look cooler with all the rounds exploding in the air.
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Smurf#smurfs_and_sex
what is know is that they do have courting rituals, here is one such ritual
what is know is that they do have courting rituals, here is one such ritual
no fun, however this raises the further question of, why just that little scrap of land?Stubbee wrote:
It was a plane. The powers that be would never admit (show) that their satellites have that kind of resolutionsfarrar33 wrote:
the most awesome thing ever is typing the co-ordinates in for them one after the other and just flying to all kinds of random places
edit: also the one with the camel, if you zoom in on it and look at the guy next to the camel who is holding it so the guy can mount it, you will notice that he is looking straight up into the sky and at the satellite, freaky.
hahaha that would be the most ultimate owned everspecops10-4 wrote:
You mean this one?OmniDeath wrote:
almost as good as the one where the kid's car gets stolen
http://my.break.com/media/view.aspx?ContentID=143069
Scion xB?
why would you make something that ugly and try and sell it to people?
took this myself, its somewhere in corfu south west of a place called Sidari, but i can't remember it's name exactly as I was just passing through at the time.
would be perfect (imo) if not for that shed on the hill, and possibly the corner of the boat at the bottom.
would be perfect (imo) if not for that shed on the hill, and possibly the corner of the boat at the bottom.
bah welcome to birmingham...
so its multiplayer sims where you can type (if you pay extra for the keyboard) or talk (if you pay extra for the headset)
its features can be found in other things and free or at a lower price, therefore the point surpases me...
i buy a console for gaming not chatting.
its features can be found in other things and free or at a lower price, therefore the point surpases me...
i buy a console for gaming not chatting.
the most awesome thing ever is typing the co-ordinates in for them one after the other and just flying to all kinds of random places
edit: also the one with the camel, if you zoom in on it and look at the guy next to the camel who is holding it so the guy can mount it, you will notice that he is looking straight up into the sky and at the satellite, freaky.
edit: also the one with the camel, if you zoom in on it and look at the guy next to the camel who is holding it so the guy can mount it, you will notice that he is looking straight up into the sky and at the satellite, freaky.
We don't blame america for the evils of the world (at least I don't, and the people I know don't) we just blame America for the ones it's caused.
hang on:
And wow its a major boost to that long lost stereotype of money grubbing jews isn't it, not to mention those dwindling numbers of neo-nazis will now have a new recruitment tactic, way to shoot yourself in the foot...
and they don't just fear dogs because they have sharp teeth?
I get the feeling those thousands didn't ask to be represented, nor did they want to be.A group representing thousands of children of Holocaust survivors...
She declined to disclose her name, but Mazor said she spoke for thousands.
And wow its a major boost to that long lost stereotype of money grubbing jews isn't it, not to mention those dwindling numbers of neo-nazis will now have a new recruitment tactic, way to shoot yourself in the foot...
who doesn't?irrational fear of starvation
how could it possibly remind them, they weren't alive!Others of the second generation say they cannot ride buses because it reminds them of the transports their parents took to the concentration camps, or they fear dogs because they were used by the Nazis to control crowds.
and they don't just fear dogs because they have sharp teeth?
????The suit says the second generation grew up "in the shadow of depression, grief and guilt of their parents, which created a powerful inclination among the children for pain and suffering."
what the fuck is that horror they are driving?
still lolz
still lolz
super size me the quick way
for doing that they should have left him to see if could have crawled himself out them all by himself
for doing that they should have left him to see if could have crawled himself out them all by himself
edit: Idea! get one for your mates and send them on a camping holiday, continuously set it off at obscure times of the night...sfarrar33 wrote:
i dno whether it counts because its not a part of the phone but these are pretty dumb in a useful way
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/3841819.stm
it's a tent that you can text, and a big orange light comes out of the top to tell you where it is.
yupRoosterCantrell wrote:
Actually, isn't the movie "Blood Diamond" plotted around that?
now go watch it and feel sorry for some africans
wow thats awesome
for some reason it makes me think of a big pissed off dragonfly
for some reason it makes me think of a big pissed off dragonfly
i dno whether it counts because its not a part of the phone but these are pretty dumb in a useful way
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/3841819.stm
it's a tent that you can text, and a big orange light comes out of the top to tell you where it is.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/3841819.stm
it's a tent that you can text, and a big orange light comes out of the top to tell you where it is.
we should create a gallery of the all time best cdog quotes, it would be amusingly pathetic
"Bill Gates and Donald Trump together couldn’t begin to afford it.”
lol no shit shirlock...
lol no shit shirlock...
its old and its fake, now wheres the one about that guy who had his cock chopped off by his wife and thrown out the car window, and later he had it re-attatched and went on to be a porn star, with the scar he got from it being the big draw...
ffs = for fucks sake
probably because its not as new, personally in terms of wonderment it wins hands down.CameronPoe wrote:
How can this:
http://z.about.com/d/architecture/1/7/N … r-lge2.jpg
have made it into the 'New 7 World Wonders' over this:
http://www.presscluboftibet.org/UserFil … palace.jpg
the Potala Palace, Tibet, which didn't even make the fucking shortlist!!!!?
Christ Redeemer is hardly a feat of engineering. Post details of which 'Wonders' you think should have made it into the top 7 or even the shortlist, perhaps something from your own country?
but it was started nearly 1,500 years ago.
on the otherhand things like the pyramids were finalists.
meh tourism, it's not corrupt, honest.
my baby, learning to drive it atm. Obviously that isn't my photo but mine is the same colour and model.
I think anyone would be arrested for having sex in the middle of street, regardless of who they were. I don't see how they have more rights, they have a parade one day out of 365 whoopdee fucking do, change the channel? wear a blindfold for a day? get so drunk your sexuality swings that way anyway?David.Podedworny wrote:
Damn right angry damn right. Gays bullshit too much and we are sick of it. They actually have more rights then other minorities(If you can call them that) Think about it if 2 black people were having sex in the street they would be arrested. But not gay's the cops would be too afraid of "Violating there Lifestyle choices" I have a lifestyle choice too i dont like bullshit. It's times like this i wish it was still the 50's.
they can get a civil partnership in some countries, so what? so can anyone else.
I don't think they are proud of the fact they are gay more proud of the fact they are who they are, which is something everyone should be do you not think?
were you even alive in the 50's?
up my arse, now go fetch a spoonMonkeyman911 wrote:
wouldnt mind
love my M16
wheres my FUCKING COOKIE??
personally i wouldn't care much if it had unlocks or not if it was a good server i would use it, if it was chock full of wankers i'd avoid it like the plague
that is such an emo image...SargeV1.4 wrote:
http://www.cinemablend.com/images/revie … 395590.jpg
any country with a population of less than 5,000 thats within the vacinity of the equator gets my vote.
but definatly not the one i live in right now, England is such a fagshite country, I spent all of thursday listening to a conservative and a UKIP official, the first said he would improve public services and the latter said he wasn't racist
but definatly not the one i live in right now, England is such a fagshite country, I spent all of thursday listening to a conservative and a UKIP official, the first said he would improve public services and the latter said he wasn't racist
Blood diamond, it killed time but i can't say it made me go 'WOW!' still always good to see DiCaprio die
'cos we live in such a depressing place if we didn't have such a sense of humour we would all be emo.S.Lythberg wrote:
USA has the best sci-fi, fantasy, and horror industries, but the brits win hands down for comedy, they're just funny for some reason.
I am suprised NZ and oz didn't make the list they do some good films or china for that matter (Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, kung fu hustle)
i don't really know what country does the best films, for something artistic you go to japan, china, korea or france. For something different you go to oz, NZ, or Spain. For something funny you come to Britain (rock on monty python). If you want something big and spectacular you go to the US with the occasional suprising films coming out every so often.
hahahahaha
surely they are all paedophiles though if they are going after young boys?
surely they are all paedophiles though if they are going after young boys?
a plane with some fucked up textures?
man your imagination sucks
I had predator chase my arse down once through a jungle that then turned into my garden and out the front of the house these giant robotic monsters were destroying the town, predator having dissapeared at this point, oh and then mulder and skully turned up and there was something to do with freddie kruger turns up mutilates them both and starts hunting after me as well. I can't remember the rest of it but meh
1) yes i realise i watch too much TV
2) no that wasn't even one of my nightmares, now those are fucked up
man your imagination sucks
I had predator chase my arse down once through a jungle that then turned into my garden and out the front of the house these giant robotic monsters were destroying the town, predator having dissapeared at this point, oh and then mulder and skully turned up and there was something to do with freddie kruger turns up mutilates them both and starts hunting after me as well. I can't remember the rest of it but meh
1) yes i realise i watch too much TV
2) no that wasn't even one of my nightmares, now those are fucked up
okCougar wrote:
Yes, lets laugh in unison to this mans national humiliation and personal, physical pain.Marlboroman82 wrote:
quick to the youtubes, someone find this videoCougar wrote:
BAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
he knew what he was [meant to be] doing, not to mention he was doing it all as a quick ticket to fame and not for any particular cause.
I lol at him
although i reserve the right to retract this should it turn out he is paralysed for life
legal elsewhere but i'm not sure why, guess its just to avoid stupid incidents and misunderstandingsNiMhurchu wrote:
"too bad it didn't actually happen" is aspersion (?) of the Holocaust, it's forbidden here and you will go to jail for that here. Don't know about EU, but at least here in Germany it's forbidden.
for some reason they want to stop teaching about it in schools :-\
on topic: i hope that one day he gets his arse slammed in jail for a long time
pig cuticlexBlackPantherx wrote:
Wrong, you can not be the owner of politically correctness.*=]AD[=*Pro_NL wrote:
prove wrong that i'm owner of a pc
Edit: You never specified what p.c. stood for.
Both 40 and 90 are bollocks because its just an average, your daily requirement may be higher or lower depending on what you do on your average day or what particular medical conditions you might have (diabetes for starters).
Possibly but not what i meant.Hallvard wrote:
There was a German submarine on it's way to Japan with some Uran that was supposed to be put in bombs and droped over USA... but the submarine surrendered some time after Germany fell after ignoring many commands to return to Germany... Japan had the tecnology to make nuclear weapons, but not the materials needed...Smithereener wrote:
Ooh. That makes more sense. Except it never happened. Got the government paranoid enough to send them to internment camps though.Noobeater wrote:
No he means after pearl harbour when the japenese had plans to bomb the hell out of california, i can't remember anything else about it though due to it being 1:44 am so night.
I made a mistake it was Oregon not California, but the story is:
The japanese invented a way to fit a very small plane in a water tight box on a sub. The top deck of the sub being transformed into a little runway and the plane being able to take off on it. The plane was too be flown over Oregon forests and drop firebombs onto them creating a fire larger than one America has had before. It all worked smoothly apart from the bombs, I think 5 bombs were dropped and only two exploded; the small fire they created being easily and quickly put out.
Theres a small bit on wikipedia about it but I can't quote where I originally found it due to it being a book.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_submarine_I-25
wiki wrote:
First aerial bombing of the continental U.S.
In June 1942, I-25 was patrolling the coast of Oregon, and shelled Battery Russell, a small coastal army installation within now decommissioned Fort Stevens. Damage was minimal. In fact, the only item of significance destroyed on the fort was a baseball backstop. On September 9, 1942, the crew again deployed the Glen, which dropped incendiary bombs over Oregon forest land, in the first ever time that the continental United States was bombed from the air, known as "The Lookout Air Raid". The goal was to trigger wildfires across the coast, but light winds, wet weather conditions and two quick acting Fire Lookouts kept the fires under control. In fact, had the winds been sufficiently brisk to stoke widespread forest fires, the lightweight Glen would have been unable to fly.
I-25 was sunk less than a year later by the destroyer USS Patterson off the New Hebrides islands on September 3, 1943.
"Dice-cream, getting kids addicted to crap since 1942"jamesb wrote:
Yep, that's if they have parents.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
They work for a reason. They need the money to feed their sick parents.jord wrote:
Not sure...
Childhood?
erm such as?Hunter/Jumper wrote:
If any Major power wants to start some nonsense and have a real war. We could use all our resourses in a total TOTAL WAR .
Better countries have tried. It would be a mistake to think any country could take on the U.S.A.
The only one i can think of was Japan, and interestingly they nearly managed to torch a large amount of Calafornia it was only luck that stopped it.
yeah you won that one (and the psychological trick would have been cooler if true) but you've still not proved me wrong once with this one, since whilst you claim to have done so twice i've managed to come up with reasonable replies why you havn't, and now i am going to come up with one that does your third claim (oh god this will numb my fingers)topal63 wrote:
His statement has been proved wrong in many ways.Gunner978 wrote:
20 minutes of typing later nothing is proved??? i enjoyed the rest of the thread tho.. Good job
There is a difference between information (words on a page; etc) and understanding. I am merely being me, and doing what I am willing to do, and that is attempt (take the time) to explain to him why and in what ways his statement is riddled with logical errors - and then make the leap from information to understanding.
Here is me taking the time to explain to him as well, why it was not a psychological manipulation, but rather a math trick (of simple eliminations).
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 4#p1414004
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 0#p1414310
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 1#p1414421
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 9#p1416609
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 0#p1417140
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 2#p1417412
1) Leads onto or is apart of 2 so i shouldn't need to go through that for anything if i've read it rightTopal63 wrote:
Wrong again (you are now thrice-wrong). I don’t need to know your exact thoughts. You thinking of a false statement or you thinking of a true statement (belief of being error-free, or labeled as the “claim”) - is not relevant.
I continue to point out your original statement has been falsified in many ways; this just being one of them.
1.) Thinking can involve contemplation of sense perception(s), but more aptly thinking is not associated with sensory perception per se; it is more closely associated with contemplation(s) of; or in; symbolic form. Math is symbolic reasoning (a language itself; in a very real sense), and human languages are symbolic representations; made of/from symbols (and words = symbolic representations of ideas, concepts, labels for things or specific images, etc).
2.) You have claimed you would not think of a claim. This is simply not true. You continue to miss the exact point of contention. I am not equivocating here. I am being specific as to where you have made your mistake in reasoning. You have stated you would not think for a week; of a so-called “claim.” And, a claim is going to be either a single statement or a serious of statements. Statements are logical/grammatical constructs of human language; symbolic representations of: ideas, concepts, labels for things or specific images, etc. To suggest you have not used language (thought in normal everyday symbolic form) for a week - is an absurd claim. It is utterly false. Therefore for that to be true you had to be either brain-dead or dead. Or, you are simply lying about not thinking (have statements of language occurring "in your mind").
3.) It does not matter if you considered some of the statements that have crossed your mind as being worthy of being posted; and then called it your "claim." The fact is you have thought of statements; claims (used language; or even math as a language) during that one-week period and any one of them could be called; self-labeled; your “claim.”
4.) Suppose you thought of a statement you considered worthy of posting and calling it your “claim” . . . “that cannot be proven wrong.” And then you posted it (during the week in question) and we proved it wrong; you thinking that it was a correct statement free of logical error - is not relevant. And, suppose you actually have thought of a statement that cannot be proven wrong; guess what that is not relevant either. It simply does not matter (as belief is at play here - as well).
Your statement is false if any portion of the statement (or serious of statements) is false. For your statement to be true - all of the conditions must be true. If any single portion/condition is false - you are wrong.
Your conditions as specified by your statement:
a.) Must be a living person.
b.) Must be the person representing themselves, behind the BF2S account name: sfarrar33.
c.) This living person will not think of a statement.
d.) This statement should be believed by, that self-same person, as being free of error (one you “cannot prove wrong”).
e.) The living person, who posts here on BF2S called sfarrar33 will not think of a (this believed to be “error free”) statement within a one week period.
f.) This statement will be called the “claim.”
g.) This self-same person will not post “it,” within this thread.
a.) Probably true. I am not going to assume your dead or posting from the grave (beyond).
b.) Probably true. I am not going to assume another person is using your account.
c.) False. It doesn’t matter of you “believe” you have thought of an error free statement or not. It doesn’t matter whether it was a falsifiable claim/statement or not. It doesn’t matter of you self-labeled it the “claim.” It only matters if you made a mental construct “in your mind” that can be called “a statement.” The subsequent mentality activity of calling it your claim is a separate condition.
d.) Many people “believe” many things that simply are false. You knowing or not-knowing, believing or not-believing you were in possession of an error-free statement - is not relevant. As an example: you could have “believed” you had an “error-free” statement, which in fact was loaded with errors, and then called it your “claim” and then you did not post it. It doesn’t matter if you: believed it was error free, believed it was error-ridden, called it your claim, did not call it your claim. You had to abstain from making any symbolic statements (math or English, or another language) “in your mind” for a whole week.
e.) One week self-imposed condition on thinking of a statement and subsequently labeling it your “claim,” assumed to be true. Not disputing your self-imposed restrictions. I am disputing that you could satisfy them (or prove; demonstrate; that you did satisfy them).
f.) Not provable in any way by you or me. You cannot demonstrate that you did not label a statement (that crossed your mind during the one-week period) a; or the; claim. And, conversely you cannot demonstrate that you did. Not posting is not proof of you labeling or not labeling a logical/grammatical statement your “claim.” That can be done (or not done) entirely in mind.
g.) This is an open ended condition. Actually considering you have not placed a time restriction on when you can post a statement, self-labeled the claim; you have now until the end of time to satisfy this condition of your original statement. So, whether or not you post a statement, anytime between now and the end of time, is not relevant. As you cannot satisfy the other conditions of your original statement (c, d and f).
2) You seem to have written in a long winded way "the use of language means you think up a claim" which lets face it, is rubbish. To suggest that in order for me too not think up a claim i would not have to use language for a week is illogical and erroneous. Really it is like saying that someone who speaks swahili (a language spoken in mainly scrub and desert countries) must know what snow is because it is a language.
3+4) The claims i think of not being worthy are such because i think up a flaw in them, and if i can find a flaw in it then i assume that one of the forum members who are going about proving claims wrong will also find such a flaw, not because i simply assume they won't be good enough. So yes i might have thought of potential claims but a part of my original statement is that i would then post them (or at least i would for you to prove the original statement wrong)
a+b) Yup nothing to say about them
c) As stated belief has nothing to do with it, any potential claims i thought up i found flaw in.
d)^^^ not to mention that in one way or another all statements or claims will have a flaw in them somewhere its just that other forum members might not find it.
e) Easy i didn't post here in a week, and a mod could easily check whether i did and then deleted it. Also something i can support but not prove is that whilst not on the bf2s.com website i generally don't think about it and so thinking of claims and things wouldn't happen because it would simply not be in my concious thought at all. The support for this being the simple fact that people have a tendancy not to think about things that are not around them or affecting them. Although I cannot remember what is likely is that at the end of the week i logged into bf2s clicked the 'your posts' part and this thread was there with a little yellow square, which would of course jog my memory.
f) Yup
g) The brackets reveal all, you see i did try to combine those two sentances in a way that encompased all the things i wanted it too say, although my efforts at doing so left grammatical errors that i have no doubt in my mind you would have used. By trying to prove the statement wrong you agree that the two sentances should be combined and the things within them interlinked. Therefore the week long time limit does apply to the thinking up and posting of a statement.
never said it wasbuLLet_t00th wrote:
But it isn't made in a shit hole by some Asian kids and doesn't have Pepsi on the front, it has 'Cola'.sfarrar33 wrote:
If I buy coke from my local kebab shop it has an arabic label on it, its suspiciously more fizzy than regular cola as well. Just 'cos its not meant to be sold here or in America that doesn't mean it isn't. Even Lidl and Nettoes survive off cheap imports from Eastern Europe...buLLet_t00th wrote:
You'd have to be a bunch of 'tards to think any of that would get sold in the US or anywhere where people value their lives (i.e. not the Middle East).
There's fucking Arabic labels on the bottles for christ sake!
IDIOTS!
http://jamesomalley.co.uk/blog/pics/23/freeway.png
but your wrong if you think cheap imports arn't sold in your country
If I buy coke from my local kebab shop it has an arabic label on it, its suspiciously more fizzy than regular cola as well. Just 'cos its not meant to be sold here or in America that doesn't mean it isn't. Even Lidl and Nettoes survive off cheap imports from Eastern Europe...buLLet_t00th wrote:
You'd have to be a bunch of 'tards to think any of that would get sold in the US or anywhere where people value their lives (i.e. not the Middle East).
There's fucking Arabic labels on the bottles for christ sake!
IDIOTS!
you can still buy that game?Nintendogamer wrote:
yeh, you gotta see battlefield vietnam now, ok so theres only like 20 servers, but the idiots on there, they drop bombs whil taking off in aeroplanes, block runways with chinooks, fly planes into hangers, Napalm own bases, the list goes on.......jsnipy wrote:
This sort of thing has been going on since the dawn of (BF*) time
well it appears god is not on the side of one of the terrorists
He has 90% burns on his body, but is going to live, so for the rest of his days he will be relying on the care of others unable to do the simplest things in life, and if the carer is NHS and anything like my mum (who is a carer and is: middle aged, strongly opinionated, DOESN'T STOP TALKING EVER!!!) that man is going to be in a living hell.
imperfect health care service 1
terrorists 0
He has 90% burns on his body, but is going to live, so for the rest of his days he will be relying on the care of others unable to do the simplest things in life, and if the carer is NHS and anything like my mum (who is a carer and is: middle aged, strongly opinionated, DOESN'T STOP TALKING EVER!!!) that man is going to be in a living hell.
imperfect health care service 1
terrorists 0
he speaks the truth!Sl4y3r wrote:
the Gallardo isnt from german police! It´s italian if you ask me!
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/299980/it … mborghini/wikipedia wrote:
In 2004, Lamborghini donated a Lamborghini Gallardo police car - fully equipped with lights and sirens and capable of travelling at almost 310 km/h - to the state police on the occasion of their 152nd anniversary. This car is used for fast delivery of plasma and organs for transplantation.
I love the comments about that video as well, they pretty much sum up a day in D&ST
5/10, it is a bit everywhere and has a kinda 'lol wut?' effect
new sig:
old sig:
which is better and by how much? (be nice i don't have proper photoshop )
new sig:
old sig:
which is better and by how much? (be nice i don't have proper photoshop )
newer sexier pic of me as promised
and my hat r greater than links
and my hat r greater than links
woo dx9 will suit me fine
if the demo works on my PC i'm saving up and getting that game
if the demo works on my PC i'm saving up and getting that game
The health difference would be useful if they act independently because then you have 200 hp instead of 100 (if you can switch weapons fast enough)
yeah but irl you could hear someone round a corner or you could fire whilst falling a measly 2ft and not hurt yourself in the process.madmurre wrote:
There´s only one major flaw - UAV/Sonars etc the game would be better if they let us rely on our own situational awareness instead of just watching the minimap all time.
itg you can't do that and the UAV and sonars compensate for that
noobish thing: repairing a walker and then putting a vehicle sonar on it and getting in the second seat, the driver then gets out and runs round the corner and types "get out its mined", I get in the drivers seat and theres no mines, he thought the sonar was gonna' expload...