ZSpid3r wrote:
* Our famous 16 Size Strike at Karkand 32 Slot Server
Search
Search results: 2,093 found, showing up to 50
He couldn't do shit to you without a gun.
It was an Airbus A310 according to CNN.
Are you too much of a pussy to say removed by mod?HollisHurlbut wrote:
In dissent, Ginsburg wrote that there's no "right" to a promotion. One can only wonder why this rationale doesn't apply when "too many" Neegrows are selected for promotion...
Maybe he is just respecting the site rules - KEN
Nuts. I was supposed to visit a flight school and fly today but there were thunderstorms. Third week in a row with flying canceled because of weather. Maybe I should take up an indoor hobby.
Adblock filter added so I never have to see that pic again.
Nowadays it's for the profit. You can make real money renting out fifty thousand computers.TopHat01 wrote:
for the lulz, IIRC.some_random_panda wrote:
Why the hell would anyone want to attack the BIOS, other than just screwing up the computer? Come to think of it, why do people write viruses at all?
HollisHurlbut wrote:
So there's an entire section (six paragraphs) consisting of nothing but pure dicta in Roper v. Simmons?san4 wrote:
They become dicta.
Color me skeptical.
It's explicitly dicta.Roper v. Simmons wrote:
Our determination that the death penalty is disproportionate punishment for offenders under 18 finds confirmation in the stark reality that the United States is the only country in the world that continues to give official sanction to the juvenile death penalty. This reality does not become controlling, for the task of interpreting the Eighth Amendment remains our responsibility.
I wouldn't defend that ridiculous opinion, but it didn't make foreign law binding in any way.
They become dicta.HollisHurlbut wrote:
When such references make their way into court opinions, what the hell do you think they become?san4 wrote:
In other words, Koh doesn't support using foreign law as binding precedent.
I'll give you a hint: it ain't green beans.
Cool story. That's gotta be the best way to pick a flight school/instructor, talking to people who know what's what.-=]NS[=-Eagle wrote:
I was originally enrolled in a part 141 college with a major in flight ops (professional pilot program). The 40 hours for the private cost $10500 but apparently there were a bunch of hidden costs that would eventually jack it to about $13000. 2 weeks before the first semester started, I got a few jobs at the airport and met some people at the part 61 school. They convinced me that it would be easier and cheaper to go through the part 61 program and they were right. I switched majors to aviation management (airlines don't care what major you have, just if you have the licenses and ratings, plus if for some reason I can't fly in the future, I'll have a backup plan) and got my license in less time than at the college for about $7000. So I had no problems with part 61. As far as motion sickness I personally haven't had any flying, but I can't read while in a car .
In other words, Koh doesn't support using foreign law as binding precedent. So are you abandoning your initial assertion to the contrary?HollisHurlbut wrote:
Proof Koh needs to GTFO. How the hell can another country's experience have any bearing on the meaning of the Constitution? "Oh, look at Germany -- they've banned Holocaust denial and don't have many problems with it, so the First Amendment might not really protect it!"Flecco wrote:
@ Hollis: The wiki article also states from two other professors what Koh apparently really means by that statement. "Neither Koh nor any serious American lawyer disputes the Constitution's supremacy within the U.S. legal system. What Koh has advocated - along with many others - is the educational value of other countries' experiences in interpreting our Constitution and statutes."
Anyone who would give that line of thought a shred of a shred of credibility is straight up retarded.
Link pleaseHollisHurlbut wrote:
Did he or did he not explicitly support the use of foreign laws and court decisions in US courts as foundation for binding precedent?
The answer is yes, he did.
Perhaps you are in this video: http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=126695
Damn, you are flying practically every day!-=]NS[=-Eagle wrote:
I liked my instructor. If you have the option, choose an instructor you're comfortable with. The sooner you feel at home up there, the easier it is. If you get stuck with someone you dislike, make the best of it. Ask a lot of questions and work though it. Worst case, try changing instructors. What school you taking, part 61 or part 141?san4 wrote:
62.5 hours isn't too shabby. Do you think your instructor is good, knowledgeable, helpful, etc? I'm concerned about ending up with a crappy instructor and not realizing it until I start to know what I'm doing.
On another note, I just went up for my first IFR (Instrument Flight Rules) flight today, meaning we could legally fly through the clouds. Needless to say, secksy pictures ensued. Can't wait to get my IFR rating after tonight.
I plan to ask a lot of questions, and see if the instructor is willing/able to answer them. I'm starting at a part 61 school this weekend. They convinced me that it's not necessary to go to a part 141. Which kind was yours?
Did you have any problems with motion sickness when you started?
62.5 hours isn't too shabby. Do you think your instructor is good, knowledgeable, helpful, etc? I'm concerned about ending up with a crappy instructor and not realizing it until I start to know what I'm doing.
How many hours do you have?
I'm actually starting flying lessons on Saturday and that's one thing I'm hoping to do eventually, fly with girlfriend over scenic things. Manhattan will probably be near the top of the list.
Is that plane rented? Have you ever taken an overnight trip in a rented plane, or is that insanely expensive?
I'm actually starting flying lessons on Saturday and that's one thing I'm hoping to do eventually, fly with girlfriend over scenic things. Manhattan will probably be near the top of the list.
Is that plane rented? Have you ever taken an overnight trip in a rented plane, or is that insanely expensive?
Awesome video. I was hoping there would be a couple of knife kills.
That was discarded by popular demand. Prone delay won't change, but accuracy will be reduced for a short time when going prone.MrAnderson wrote:
Prone delay has been increased.
The changelog/summary from the horse's mouth: http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/batt … cking.html
I still don't know what changes were made to the F-35 and J-10 other than making the F-35 lock on with the same delay as the other planes.
She also won the national sexting championship.
They should give the robot a penis so interns could give it head and no one would care.
The Palestinians immediately rejected what Peres proposed, a Palestinian state with provisional borders. I'm sure he knew they would reject it when he said it, so he was probably just playing games.CameronPoe wrote:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1092140.html
Have we another Yitzhak Rabin on our hands? I certainly hope so. Shimon Peres, the President of Israel, is cutting through the shit from Likud and the Zionists and making a stand on a Palestinian state. Good man.
Doesn't matter anyway, the controversy about Israel endorsing a Palestinian state is irrelevant to the so-called peace process.
I learned to fly and bomb by playing Operation Clean Sweep in singleplayer.
Did you use a velocity envelope to speed up or slow down the audio or video?
If you're copying news articles from other sources and posting them with ads, you are almost certainly violating copyrights. You might get letters from lawyers if you start getting enough hits.
Steve Earle, at least his earlier stuff.
And you can't go wrong with Jerry Jeff Walker.
And you can't go wrong with Jerry Jeff Walker.
QFT. Just make a rule against killing admins, because protecting admins is the reason for those rules anyway.Oisín | Irishpride wrote:
Server is now rendered stupid.PrivateVendetta wrote:
Warning everyone at the start of the round not to pad rape with those mass messages is not a good way to do it.
No one can ever read those, or ever does.
Public servers only work properly when there are minimal rules. I've seen some of the more up-to-date Autoadmin servers run well too (with just the anti-baserape). You might aswel quit your subscription now if you're gonna' make rules like ;No Bunnyhopping, No Dolphin-Diving, No Padrape, No Avoiding Enemy Bullets/ ect...
The Palestinian Authority also will have to drop its insistence on a total right of return. Settlements, roadblocks and the Gaza blockade are not relevant to peace--according to the Arabs. Neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority have suggested they would be willing to change their stance under any circumstances.CameronPoe wrote:
lowings comment was a generalised comment that didn't refer specifically to Palestine. It was a catch all reference to Arabs/Muslims or any land 'ceded' by Israel - he made no distinction. Lowing is fond of generalisations.Karbin wrote:
Again, it's under control of Egypt. Egypt has a peace treaty. (Camp David)
Gaza is under the control of Hamas.
Hamas's 1988 charter calls for replacing the State of Israel with a Palestinian Islamic state in the area that is now Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip.
Kind a hard to get a peace treaty with that in your charter.
Hamas will have to change their stance. If Sinn Féin could in the six counties, viewed in the context of the 1960s/1970s, then anything is possible.
If you are suggesting that peace happens when Arabs change their opinions, we're saying the same thing.CameronPoe wrote:
Oh that's right - Egypt and Jordan aren't Arab, Fatah didn't recognise Israel's right to exist, Qatar doesn't have low-level relations with Israel and Syria weren't clandestinely discussing peace with Israel in exchange for getting the Golan Heights back...san4 wrote:
Fixed.Karbin wrote:
As long as Arab opinions on the ME remain entrenched, nothing will change.
The Palestinian and other Arab leaders refuse accept Israel as a Jewish state. They don't want peace, they want the Jews gone.
Like many people, Cam likes to pretend otherwise.
Hamas and its comrades in the Islamic Brotherhood provide a wide range of social services for poor people in Arab countries with corrupt and ineffective governments.
Did you check the UBAR?
The court had mercy because he was a widower . . .
Fixed.Karbin wrote:
As long as Arab opinions on the ME remain entrenched, nothing will change.
The Palestinian and other Arab leaders refuse accept Israel as a Jewish state. They don't want peace, they want the Jews gone.
Like many people, Cam likes to pretend otherwise.
This statement contains significant inaccuracies. It is incorrect to say that "Israel took everything they have today from Palestinians." The Israelis purchased land in Palestine from Arabs throughout the first half of the 20th century. Although Israelis did force some Arabs to leave after the Arab armies attacked in 1948, the purchased land was clearly not "taken".CameronPoe wrote:
lol.Harmor wrote:
Why should we allow Palestinians to have their own state if half their government are terrorists who indiscriminately send rockets into civilian areas of Israel?
Whose people support suicide bomber killing dozens of civilians at a time?
Whose people support these war crimes?
Why? Am I missing something here? Shouldn't we expect the Palestinians to moderate first before we ever concede anything to them?
Why do Palestinians deserve a state?
The reason Palestinians lash out in such a manner is exactly because they don't have a state and Israeli occupation is perpetuating a spiral of poverty and misery in their homeland. Israel took everything they have today from Palestinians. Israel are the primary cunts here, never forget that. Israel have brought this on themselves.
/discussion
Perhaps my response should be 'Why does such a retarded OP deserve a response?'.
There is also little basis for saying that Hamas lashes out because they don't have a state. Hamas itself has stated otherwise. They say they "lash out" because God wants them to get rid of Israel. Giving them a state won't end their quest.
Europe is the primary cunts here, never forget that. They persecuted Jews for nearly 2000 years and made the creation of a Jewish state necessary. European anti-semitism is the ultimate source of the burden being borne by the Palestinian Arabs.
I'm outraged by the fact that the Americans in the photos raped people while they were acting as agents of the American government, wearing uniforms with American flags on them. They raped people in America's name. Doesn't that make your blood boil?lowing wrote:
So how violent was your rioting when people were getting there heads sawed off, or hung from a bridge and set on fire?san4 wrote:
I am going to join the riots when the pictures are released.
Yours and all the others inconsistent and selective outrage would be quite amusing if it were not so ridiculously tragic..
The assholes who sawed off people's heads didn't act in America's name. They should be caught and locked up forever but they didn't damage my country the way the prison guards did.
I am going to join the riots when the pictures are released.
That is exactly why I learned to fly. Some bastard in the bomber on Daqing was killing me every time I got into a vehicle so I spent the rest of the round going from flag to flag on foot, the whole time swearing someday I was going to be the bastard in the bomber.H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:
i dont see why more people dont get an urge to want to learn to fly, at first I was really bad but I kept seeing jets taking over the map so it really made me want to learn to fly
BF2 will create a default controls.con if it can't find the file. So if you just rename your controls.con and run BF2 you will get a brand new default one.
I don't think so.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Yeah back in 1.12 bro.Pubic wrote:
Have they fixed the missile lock bug? The one where if the pilot swaps out it loses lock
.
I agree, RAIMUS did succeed in raining on the parade somewhat but I think part of the problem is a failure to abandon traditional conceptions of what fighter jets are like.FEOS wrote:
No. Most planes are not. Many combat aircraft are, but typically only those that are nuke capable--to protect them from the EMP they create when they launch/drop their payload.Commie Killer wrote:
Arent most planes protected against EMPs? I know jamming can knock back the radar and disrupt communications, but Im pretty sure onboard systems are protected, cockpit is at least I think(gold overlays and what ever).
All this talk of maneuvering is interesting, but I think RAIMIUS has hit it on the head: we're not there yet for the maneuvering required for dogfighting or SAM evasion. We don't have all-aspect antennae that allow for remote control through those types of maneuvers and the processing power and sensors required for the necessary situational awareness aren't there to keep the UAVs from running into one another while maneuvering in congested airspace.
A new generation of unmanned aircraft could start out being more like missiles. For example, how about an air-to-air missile that can be guided by radar, infrared and remote control? We know that air-to-air missiles can be effective. Remote control would not replace the other guidance systems, but it would fill in the gaps when radar or infrared sensors are temporarily jammed or blocked and the remote pilot can still see the enemy aircraft. The missile would require a camera or two and significant bandwidth to handle high-resolution video, but these seem like plausible, incremental changes. I agree, it's not happening tomorrow, but I don't see why it couldn't happen in the next 10 years. Especially if we threw billions of dollars at it.
ATG is playing with lime, potash and bleach. I don't know much about homemade explosives, but I am going to stay away from government facilities for the next few weeks.
Do you get an error message when you are kicked?
Future unmanned fighters may not look like today's fighters. Imagine a swarm of a hundred 5-foot-long minijets with rocket boosters, each one packed with C4. A swarm like that could be pretty effective at achieving air superiority. They could also provide close air support with kamikaze C4 dives on enemy tanks and positions. And good luck to enemy surface-to-air missiles shooting down a hundred tiny planes.
lol +1AussieReaper wrote:
Human error will be a thing of the past.
Wow. After the F-35, military planes will be primarily unmanned. I knew that day would come but didn't realize it was so close. Is anyone else wowed by this?Aviation Week wrote:
In recent testimony on Capitol Hill, Gates and Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have maintained the unmanned theme. Pressed by defense authorizer and Lockheed Martin aircraft supporter Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) over the need to overcome enemy surface-to-air missiles, Gates noted May 14: “I would say the only defense against surface-to-air missiles is not something that has a pilot in it.”
Mullen noted that some analysts and officials see the JSF as the last, new strictly manned fighter or bomber — and that he was one of them.
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/jsp_incl … uperiority
Major problem with solar power is that they only produce power during the day. Write about ways people have dealt with that problem.
It's hard to do a decent jet movie. There's no point in showing clips of yourself on an enemy plane's 6 o'clock, the interesting part is how did you get there.
Wow, that's a huge change in the game. I don't know if it's good or bad but 'taking a leaf out of BF2142's book' doesn't seem too smart, given that 2142 was kind of a flop.Fat_Swinub wrote:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/batt … ost8942669OK so the jumping is back at 0.3 second delay.
However thats not the end of this, we have taken a leaf out of BF2142's book and now added deviation when going prone. So while it'll be possible to prone in the air you'll lose your aim accuracy in exchange.
Maybe the Nazis were just trying to top England, France, Russia, Spain and Portugal. It's kind of silly to think the reasons the Nazis persecuted Jews were very different from the reasons everyone else did.
The world doesn't care unless it's Israelis doing it.
The line about hoping Rush Limbaugh's kidneys fail was totally inappropriate, but Wanda Sykes had a number of lines that were hilarious. I agree with her, I don't want to see Obama's nipples either.