11 Bravo wrote:
wtf is this nerd shit
Search
Search results: 2,706 found, showing up to 50
Nope, not funny at all.
RiP
oki, +1 karma point to you if he didn't know that and +1 karma point to me if he just wants it locked.burnzz wrote:
i'm willing to bet he didn't know how . . .mafia996630 wrote:
Why don't you delete this ?Hunter/Jumper wrote:
why don't they close this ?
Why don't you delete this ?Hunter/Jumper wrote:
why don't they close this ?
I really don't get where this thread is going : s .
/close.
/close.
http://browsershots.org/http://dev.ihatethisgame.com/
Also i don't think he was asking for a compatibility test.* Chrome 5.0
Chrome 6.0
Dillo 0.8
Dillo 2.2
ELinks 0.11
ELinks 0.12
Epiphany 2.22
Epiphany 2.30
Firefox 2.0
Firefox 3.0
Firefox 3.5
Firefox 3.6
Firefox 4.0
Flock 2.0
Galeon 2.0
Iceape 1.1
Iceape 3.6
Iceweasel 1.0
Iceweasel 2.0
Iceweasel 3.0
* Kazehakase 0.5
Konqueror 3.5
Konqueror 4.2
Konqueror 4.4
Konqueror 4.5
Links 2.2
Lynx 2.8
Minefield 3.7
MSIE 8.0
Navigator 9.0
Opera 10.0
Opera 10.10
Opera 10.60
Opera 9.63
Opera 9.80
Safari 532.4
Safari 5.0
SeaMonkey 1.1
SeaMonkey 2.0
Shiretoko 3.5
* Avant 11.7
Chrome 5.0
Chrome 6.0
Firefox 1.5
Firefox 2.0
Firefox 3.0
Firefox 3.5
Firefox 3.6
Flock 1.2
Flock 2.5
Flock 2.6
K-Meleon 1.1
K-Meleon 1.5
Minefield 3.2
Minefield 3.7
* MSIE 4.0
MSIE 5.0
MSIE 5.5
MSIE 6.0
MSIE 7.0
MSIE 8.0
Navigator 9.0
Netscape 8.1
Opera 10.0
Opera 7.0
Opera 7.11
Opera 7.54
Opera 8.0
Opera 8.53
Opera 8.54
* Opera 9.50
Opera 9.51
Opera 9.52
Opera 9.60
Opera 9.61
Opera 9.62
Opera 9.63
Opera 9.64
Opera 9.80
Safari 3.0
Safari 4.0
Safari 5.0
SeaMonkey 1.1
SeaMonkey 2.0
Shiretoko 3.5
* Camino 2.0
Safari 3.2
Safari 5.0
1. PSD to HTML
* Dillo 2.0
Epiphany 2.22
Firefox 3.0
Kazehakase 0.5
Konqueror 3.5
Opera 9.64
SeaMonkey 1.1
1.
1st. I don't think thats the only way to understand it, sure if you want to go in-depth then yeah learning Arabic is a good idea but to understand the basics, English is fine.Shahter wrote:
that would pretty much be the opinion of those, who professionaly studied arabic literature and religion, yes. translating koran would be like translating Jabberwocky - it's simply impossibe not to loose most of the delicate stuff in that brilliant - though absolutely nonsencial - piece of poetly in translation.Phrozenbot wrote:
So I guess the only way to truly understand would be to read it in Arabic.
so, i repeat: koran, like all the other "holy scriptures" - is a book of nonsence, and it was made that way on purpose. even thouse, who speak arabic languge all their life, still have trouble understanding koran. forget about translations, they won't do you any good - not without special education anyway. instead look for annotations and stuff like that.
2nd. The reason why those that speak Arabic language have trouble understanding it is due to the advanced dialect used.
Also, Annotations and other resources related to a book accompany IT, and can not be used as a substitute.
Here's a fun fact: Muhammad (pbuh) could neither read nor write.
That what i was thinking!DonFck wrote:
He'd be an amazing WWE Wrestler.
Get used to it! Its human nature.Turquoise wrote:
I agree. Some Americans are tards about flag burning.mafia996630 wrote:
I think you mean to say some Muslims and while i understand where you are coming from, its not gone happen. Your same logic can be applied to Americans getting pissy over flag buring, etc, etc.Turquoise wrote:
I think what Muslims need to realize is that people would choose to offend them less if they just learned to ignore shit.
There's no need to riot over a book burning, just like there's no need to protest the NYC community center.
People need to seriously grow up.
I just wish people across the board would just act less like dumbasses and more like reasonable individuals. It's starting to get rather frustrating when you feel like being rational puts you in the extreme minority.
I think you mean to say some Muslims and while i understand where you are coming from, its not gone happen. Your same logic can be applied to Americans getting pissy over flag buring, etc, etc.Turquoise wrote:
I think what Muslims need to realize is that people would choose to offend them less if they just learned to ignore shit.mafia996630 wrote:
I question the legality of the source, however while it is a tiny church: there is no denying anti-Islam attitude that far extends past the tiny church from the middle of nowhere as seen in various recent events.Mekstizzle wrote:
god these muslims are such retards, it's a fucking tiny church from the middle of nowhere
There's no need to riot over a book burning, just like there's no need to protest the NYC community center.
People need to seriously grow up.
I question the legality of the source, however while it is a tiny church: there is no denying anti-Islam attitude that far extends past the tiny church from the middle of nowhere as seen in various recent events.Mekstizzle wrote:
god these muslims are such retards, it's a fucking tiny church from the middle of nowhere
Also, they haven't starting buring bibles.
I think i'll put this right here.
I think i'll put this right here.
i want to bang her.
Do we even know who the backers are ?Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Actually if you had read it it is only asking for (YOUR) take on themafia996630 wrote:
Beduin wrote:
We have enough threads about the Hamas/Hizbullah/Alqaeda-LINKED, ISLAMIC SUPREMACIST mega mosque that is going to be a terror command center.
Backers etc of the proposed N.Y.C. mosque are being ARE THEY being
altruistic and pure of heart in their intention of building a mosque / Y.M.M.A. or whatever its gonna be ? Not Should it be allowed is it wrong legal etc.
is English a second language here ?
Beduin wrote:
We have enough threads about the Hamas/Hizbullah/Alqaeda-LINKED, ISLAMIC SUPREMACIST mega mosque that is going to be a terror command center.
^lol
ALso, wtf dude, how could you forget to post the best one :mafia996630 wrote:
I spent some time writing that fuking img code in. wankers.Dilbert_X wrote:
Problem is site doesn't allow hotlinking.
My selection from that awesome find:
http://imgur.com/PyRbf.jpg
http://imgur.com/YByp9.jpg
http://imgur.com/WrZAb.jpg
http://imgur.com/nhPy1.jpg
http://imgur.com/C63hg.jpg
I spent some time writing that fuking img code in. wankers.Dilbert_X wrote:
Problem is site doesn't allow hotlinking.
My selection from that awesome find:
http://imgur.com/PyRbf.jpg
http://imgur.com/YByp9.jpg
http://imgur.com/WrZAb.jpg
http://imgur.com/nhPy1.jpg
http://imgur.com/C63hg.jpg
i would
if it was legal
if it was legal
Because it does matter ?Uzique wrote:
where's the 'it doesn't matter one fucking bit, therefore i dont care' option?
Did not know that, hmmm.Phrozenbot wrote:
George Washington swore on a masonic Bible during inauguration.
Was George Washington a Mason or a Christian?
Black and Muslim ? rightttt.
Here is another article:Peter wrote:
No source and terrible article.
Did I tell you guys that i read some documents on wikileaks and it proves jews did 11/9 i won't tell you how though
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/au … den-us-spy
Also while I agree the man is senile, and probably has enough reasons to hate the US. Its intrigues me that he spoke about wikileaks.
Fidel Castro claims that Osama bin Laden works for the CIA, reaching the conclusion through Wikileaks
What do we all think ? Just another tinfoilhatguy ? or just another way to portray the USA in a bad light ?
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100827/ap_ … in_laden_1
Not too sure how wikileaks did what he claimed it did but interesting none the less.HAVANA, CUBA : Fidel Castro on Saturday claimed that Osama bin Laden is on the payroll of the U.S. intelligence agency, the CIA, and that former U.S. President George Bush commissioned the al-Qaeda leader whenever he needed to increase fear in the U.S., the Guardian reported.
Castro, the former President of Cuba who has a history of distrust of the United States, said that he knows that this is true because he has read WikiLeaks. He shared this revelation with a visiting Lithuanian writer, Daniel Estulin, who is known for his conspiracy theories about plots for world domination.
"Bush never lacked for Bin Laden's support. He was a subordinate," Castro said. "Any time Bush would stir up fear and make a big speech, Bin Laden would appear, threatening people with a story about what he was going to do."
Castro said that the thousands of leaked pages of classified documents by whistleblower website Wikileaks revealed that the al-Qaeda leader was working for the United States. "Who showed that [Bin Laden] is indeed a CIA agent was Wikileaks It proved it with documents," Castro said, however he didn't explain how.
Castro did disagree with Estulin on one point when Estulin said that the human race needed to find another planet to live on because of overcrowding. Castro was not very keen on the idea, saying that man only made it to the moon, which is unsuitable as a new home and anything beyond wasn't much better. He said that it was better to fix things on earth.
"Humanity ought to take care of itself if it wants to live thousands more years," he said.
What do we all think ? Just another tinfoilhatguy ? or just another way to portray the USA in a bad light ?
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100827/ap_ … in_laden_1
good one!Uzique wrote:
search forum by user 'pace' for posts
read
???
profit
Congrats whoeveryouare and remember :
Whats with all the spam ?
Edit @ rdx-fx: will respond to you when i get time.
Edit 2 @reaper: this would have been funnier :
Edit @ rdx-fx: will respond to you when i get time.
Edit 2 @reaper: this would have been funnier :
Still dead.CammRobb wrote:
"She suffered the death of a loved one"Peter wrote:
Why not? She suffered the death of a loved one. If they can't prove she had knowledge or information regarding the attacks before they took place then she should be entitled to equal compensation.
You can hardly call it a death. The moron blew himself up, taking scores of people with him.
I don't know how people can argue with such logic.Beduin wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZpT2Muxoo0
and you think you did something new with that post right ?rdx-fx wrote:
If I'm in charge of a global conspiracy, I'm going to embed subtle clues as to our existence and motives in various mass media, just so people like Dan Brown and the Tinfoil Hat Brigade can puzzle out our existence. Gotcha. Makes perfect sense.
Dictators, genocide, starvation, wars, religious fanaticism.
All a smoke screen so mass media artists can subtly put clues in their works, so people so inclined can carefully deduce hidden meanings from them.
Or, the Tinfoil Hatters may have a touch of Paranoid Schizophrenia
Or, I'm just one of the many minions of The Conspiracy, monitoring all available communications channels to discredit The Truth.
(We changed the name from Illiminati to 'The Conspiracy' about 1985. Sounds more modern. Illuminati has too much of an ancient Latin ring to it)
haha.
Dude, I completely missed your post earlier. Anyway by Artist, I mean current day music artists, which is what the OP is about!Cybargs wrote:
because they probably were masons?mafia996630 wrote:
really ? i don't think you believe that.Varegg wrote:
Attention?
Any of you smart arses want to take a shot at it ?
its called the eye of providence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_seeing_eyeIt's been used in ancient Egypt as well. And what do you mean all these artists? out of the millions of paintings only a VERY VERY few have put in the all seeing eye.In Medieval and Renaissance European iconography, the Eye (often with the addition of an enclosing triangle) was an explicit image of the Christian Trinity. Seventeenth-century depictions of the Eye of Providence sometimes show it surrounded by clouds or sun bursts.
How can you say that when the music video have been digitally edited to include these symbols.Spark wrote:
No.mafia996630 wrote:
ok, there is a reason why all the symbols are where they are. It has a purpose, would you agree with that observation ?Spark wrote:
Because the entire premise of that logic is that "well I can make up an explanation so therefore it must be true." Proof by declaration.
Not everything occurs because of a deliberate reason.
Most, if not everything happens for a reason.
ok, there is a reason why all the symbols are where they are. It has a purpose, would you agree with that observation ?Spark wrote:
Because the entire premise of that logic is that "well I can make up an explanation so therefore it must be true." Proof by declaration.mafia996630 wrote:
Chill with the caps foo. That was explained in one of the videos but the point I am making is: I; as a halftinfoilnut believe that all these symbols were put there for a reason, for a purpose: simple. How can you dismiss such a stright forward statement ?Cybargs wrote:
If a super duper secret organization wants to remain super duper secret, WHY THE FUCK WOULD THEY LET EVERYONE AND THEIR DOG KNOW THEIR SYMBOL.
Actually, the burden of proof is on you tin foil guys to convince us, not the other way around.
You couldn't answer questions in relation to your query. My theory is that it is all related to something big, its like the pieces of a puzzle, a small bit of it may be stupid and illogical but as a whole, it works.Every little symbol, every line of lyrics has an origin.Varegg wrote:
What?mafia996630 wrote:
Actually, you provided the theory (in order to get popular). I queried your theory, its down to you to answer that. Unless you can't ?Varegg wrote:
Indeed why ... what is your theory?
I already gave you a theory of why I think they use the symbols ... now I'd like to hear from you why they use those symbols ...
^^My theory can be applied to life in general.
Actually, you provided the theory (in order to get popular). I queried your theory, its down to you to answer that. Unless you can't ?Varegg wrote:
Indeed why ... what is your theory?mafia996630 wrote:
What about already popular artist like Jay Z ? Why do they do it ?
Chill with the caps foo. That was explained in one of the videos but the point I am making is: I; as a halftinfoilnut believe that all these symbols were put there for a reason, for a purpose: simple. How can you dismiss such a stright forward statement ?Cybargs wrote:
If a super duper secret organization wants to remain super duper secret, WHY THE FUCK WOULD THEY LET EVERYONE AND THEIR DOG KNOW THEIR SYMBOL.mafia996630 wrote:
So why such a select few ? if it makes their music so popular, why doesn't every artist do it ?Varegg wrote:
Attention is the same as publicity for an commercial artist, and a commercial artist kinda gets paid according to how popular they are ... the more attention the better ... even bad attention sells you more records ... so yes I believe that very much ...
If I was a musician my first album would definately have an image of the all seeing eye, if I was a writer I would have a picture of it on the cover ... why? ... because it sells copies ...
What about already popular artist like Jay Z ? Why do they do it ?
Also how popular are they making themselves ? the method they use to portray these symbols is a intriguing one as the people that will see it blatantly are those tinfoilnuts who slow the video down and etc, no other normal personal will look/care. Being popular with the tinfoilnuts is bad publicity, and does nothing to help the artist's cause.
Actually, the burden of proof is on you tin foil guys to convince us, not the other way around.
So why such a select few ? if it makes their music so popular, why doesn't every artist do it ?Varegg wrote:
Attention is the same as publicity for an commercial artist, and a commercial artist kinda gets paid according to how popular they are ... the more attention the better ... even bad attention sells you more records ... so yes I believe that very much ...mafia996630 wrote:
really ? i don't think you believe that.Varegg wrote:
Attention?
Any of you smart arses want to take a shot at it ?
If I was a musician my first album would definately have an image of the all seeing eye, if I was a writer I would have a picture of it on the cover ... why? ... because it sells copies ...
What about already popular artist like Jay Z ? Why do they do it ?
Also how popular are they making themselves ? the method they use to portray these symbols is a intriguing one as the people that will see it blatantly are those tinfoilnuts who slow the video down and etc, no other normal personal will look/care. Being popular with the tinfoilnuts is bad publicity, and does nothing to help the artist's cause.
really ? i don't think you believe that.Varegg wrote:
Attention?mafia996630 wrote:
ok, from half a tinfoilguy to apparentlyallknowingguy (best I could come up with : ( ) : Whats with all these artists depicting the all seeing eye so vividly in they videos ?Varegg wrote:
Well ... the problem really is ...
tinfoilguy: Zomg conspiracy, I have proof of this and that ...
theotherguy: Counters the theory by showing the tinfoilguy that the website he linked to isn't proof because it was made by another tinfoilguy ...
tinfoilguy: doesn't post anything else
Simplified of course ...
Any of you smart arses want to take a shot at it ?
haha, that cartoon illustrates a point/statement. Just like the cartoon below illustrates a point/statementDBBrinson1 wrote:
NEVER! It proves you are basing your argument on a cartoon.mafia996630 wrote:
o please, give it a rest. Its just to prove a point.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Trying to turn a cartoon into a map? Fail.
Need i say more.
o please, give it a rest. Its just to prove a point.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Trying to turn a cartoon into a map? Fail.
1st. That is not what you call "playing the devil's advocate".jord wrote:
That's like 1 of 5 posts here I've played devils advacote in a semi troll esque manner.mafia996630 wrote:
jord wrote:
Ironic irony.funny shit.Are either particularly important in the grand scheme of things ?
If you're not ranting about the new world order working with the illuminati to control everyone, you're arguing the palastinian/muslim/arab side with a gross bias with no logic.
2nd. Admit that was a bad post and move on, or just move on.
3rd. I'm 60 percent logic baby!
Not gone be silly enough to get in a Tit for tat match with you, any time soon.