Drink a pint of water before going to bed and that wont happen.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
When I'm drunk and I go to bed sometimes I have crazy dreams about going to a water fountain and not being able to quench my thirst or opening a fridge full of 20 oz bottles of Mountain Dew then waking up thirsty as hell, etc.
Search
Search results: 757 found, showing up to 50
You had half a pack of digestives? I can tell you right now thats why you woke up after just 4 hours.
As for the dream, I have no idea.
As for the dream, I have no idea.
i wish i was black.
Anybody fancy hacking my account (adam1503)? I dont care, I dont use it anymore since I completely quit BF2 recently.
well it is 15 months old...
Something weird happens to Firefox when I open web.archive.org... I cant close tabs, it slows right down and bizzarely everything i type in the address bar is displayed in reverse
lol I thought this thread was over.
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
shut up
I remember having a similar problem when I bought NS, I had to contact EA to get it sorted out. Email their support services at http://support.ea.com for help.
This is why im becoming more and more tired of this community: almost every thread worth discussing becomes a shit-slinging carnival. They always end the same, but then I suppose its to be expected. You will probably be too busy taking shots at each other to even notice this post!
Well its not for everyone, but then 14 is a little early to tackle that kind of thing. There are so many different things going on at once, and the narrative jumps all over the place, so its not the easiest book to read unless you like that kind of thing (or have to study it for A-Level coursework lol)KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Oh my god. Easily worst book I've ever had to read. Maybe it was because I was only 14 when I read it, but I absolutely hated that book.adam1503 wrote:
Wuthering Heights is good...
EDIT: plus there's PLENTY of literary criticism out there about it.
Wuthering Heights is good...
EDIT: plus there's PLENTY of literary criticism out there about it.
EDIT: plus there's PLENTY of literary criticism out there about it.
Its difficult to get into, but good when you do.ig wrote:
i fucking hate death of a salesman lol
It would suck more if it landed in Russia.Poseidon wrote:
That would really suck if it landed in Iran.
Interesting fact: Around 1000 tonnes of material burns up in the earth's atmosphere every day.
I had mine removed when I was about 3... so naturally I dont remember a thing
(sorry, I know its not helpful at all...)
(sorry, I know its not helpful at all...)
You do realise I wasnt rreally asking for a source...
Also, this thread seems to be over, and its not even 24 hours old...
Also, this thread seems to be over, and its not even 24 hours old...
"Source or you lie"Left_hand wrote:
They said that about Hitler!
You deny the chance that there was an agenda leading up to te invasion of Iraq?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/ … 0830.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/ … 0830.shtml
Rumsfeld wrote:
"Go massive," the notes quote him as saying. "Sweep it all up. Things related and not."
The Catcher In The Rye
1984.
No, Rumsfeld was in on it too...usmarine2005 wrote:
How many countries supported it and gave us intel? How many democrats including Clinton said Saddam must be taken out? Jesus you think it was just Bush or something.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
The invasion surprised Saddam - interesting. It still doesn't give credit to the fact that the "evidence" in going to war was weak, misrepresented, and there was a definite agenda in the push for war.
And how long will you continue to support Musharraf?
That was below the belt.usmarine2005 wrote:
Ya....I guess insignificant countries lie Ireland and Argentina can't do much. After all, the Brits bitch slapped you guys for the Falklands.sergeriver wrote:
What could Ireland have done? I know, they could have invaded Germany, shot Hitler, use the German Army to defeat Stalin, and then go back to Dublin.
LOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOL
Splinter Cell. I love the deep political story lines, though they got worse in the sequels.
I just think stealthing your way through a level without getting seen ever is more rewarding and enjoyable than going in guns blazing ala Rainbow Six (which is still awesome nonetheless).
I just think stealthing your way through a level without getting seen ever is more rewarding and enjoyable than going in guns blazing ala Rainbow Six (which is still awesome nonetheless).
Thats why my left hand never gets chilly... cos its next to mah willy.*=]AD[=*Pro_NL wrote:
if you put it in you pants for about 20 seconds it will be warm again
Yeah this is annoying, there is a server-side bug that happens every once in a while that causes problems with squadding up. Occasionally you will find that nobody can make a squad and that your team cant even have a commander.
Actually I get this a lot... after using my mouse for a while I will suddenly notice that my right hand is freezing... odd.
EDIT: I have it right now lol
EDIT: I have it right now lol
Pen and paper?
How about nuking them into the shape of a giant vagina.
Then we really could fuck the Russians. With our penises.
Then we really could fuck the Russians. With our penises.
Lewis Hamilton as a recent example.
Shame Colin McRae wont be there...
This effect would work even better if you could incorporate it into a wrap-around headset, the kind that completely covers your eyes. That would be more like actually being in the game than viewing it through a window...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7210036.stm
Looks like were not all about appeasing terrorists after all...Far-right political leaders from four EU nations have unveiled plans to form a pan-European "patriotic" party.
The heads of far-right parties from Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria and France said their aim was to defend Europe against "Islamisation" and immigrants.
Soloing drives you nuts? Then fly with a friend...
$132 (~£66) an hour sounds worth it to me...
There are two good ways to learn your way around the game:squatpuke wrote:
Are there "empty" servers where I can go and learn my way around the game? Or can I play locally?
tyia
1.) Create a local server
All this means is that you host a game on your machine. Unless your computer is connected to a local network with anyone else who plays BF2, your game will stay empty. This is just like playing on an empty server i.e. you dont have to do anything because theres nobody to play against. The great benefit of doing this is that it allows you to become familiar with every weapon, vehicle and map without having to worry about time limits or getting killed.
To create a local server, click on the "Multiplayer" tab at the top of your BF2 screen, then select "Create Local". Here you can select a map of any size and change any game paramaters e.g. spawn time, round time etc. Its a good idea to put the spawn time right down when youre practicing so that you can jump straight back in when you die
2.) Play Single Player
Playing a single player match allows you to get to grips with playing against other players (except that the bots in single player are a walk in the park compared to real-life players :S). Its pretty self-explanatory how to start a game here, just go to Single Player and select a map to start playing. Youll notice that you cant change the map size in single player, thats because theres always a fixed number of bots in-game. It wouldnt make sense to have you and 15 bots on a map made for 64 players...
Like Hellhead said, make sure you get plenty of practice in on the different vehicles and classes (soldier types) before you get online, and be sure to read the wiki pages. As I said, the bots are nothing compared to the average gamer you will find in BF2, and the first time you play on a populated server, you will see what I mean. You will get killed a lot. But dont let that put you off.
Put in plenty of practice, and you will get a lot of enjoyment out of BF2.
Dont Look Back In Angerjord wrote:
If I must...SEREMAKER wrote:
welcome back ................... join the freedom fighters
Also, Oasis is on. That so Sally can wait song.
You have kids? Dear God...lowing wrote:
I even told this story to my sons in hopes they can learn the cheap way. So far, I can say they have.
You think that was the biggest fuck-up in the invasion of Iraq?ATG wrote:
The primary fuck up? Companies like Halliburton making millions/billions off the war.
I would say it was the lack of any coherent post-war plan to re-establish the country once Saddam was overthrown. If we'd had it all planned out beforehand Iraq might not be in the mess it is today.
3. Work with the wider Muslim community to help combat radical Islam.lowing wrote:
well I guess no one is willing to tell us........
When were Spanish elections influenced by terrorist demands? Can you quote a source for me?
Hehe, it did feel that way a little bitKing_County_Downy wrote:
I'm not against him, I just don't think he'll win.
Also, sorry if it seems like we're ganging up on you just joining in on the convo... Feel free to speak your mind here
Thats fair enough, I can understand why you would think he cant win. But how much of what he stands for do you agree/disagree with? The only way any politician stands a chance of winning is if people to support them. You dont vote for the winner or the one who raised the most money or the one who aired the most ads, you vote for the candidate who most reflects what you believe in.
Wow the anti-Ron Paul sentiment here is unbeilevable. Even the mods are joining in! I really dont understand why you should be so opposed to him, what is it you all have against him?
I trust Ron Paul.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Let me guess: you trust politicians?adam1503 wrote:
Let me guess: you think this was just Ron Paul supporters pretending to be in the Military when they donated?
Let me guess: you think this was just Ron Paul supporters pretending to be in the Military when they donated?
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id … amp;page=1
and
http://www.capitaleye.org/inside.asp?ID=300
and
http://www.capitaleye.org/inside.asp?ID=300
ABC wrote:
Another Paul constituency, interestingly enough, comes from the military. A study by the Center for Responsive Politics found Paul received more campaign cash from members of the military than any other Republican presidential candidate.
The study of contributions of $200 and more during the first two quarters shows that Paul has raised three times as much from members of the military as what's been raised by GOP fundraising front-runner Romney, and four times what Giuliani garnered.
mature.ig wrote:
go to bed.adam1503 wrote:
And this joke is funny why?