Call of duty 4: mordern warfare
Search
Search results: 1,526 found, showing up to 50
I hope you can recover from this, financially speaking and your reputation. And then sit back and look at what happened, see what you can do to avoid it happening again.
There's a section of society for everyone. There's a section that believes the crap the Labour party comes up with but that doesn't mean they're right.syndicat111 wrote:
My point was that there is a section of societe that listens to the Bishop - that is to say, he still retains some degree of influence.
This Archbishop is off his rocker. We don't need separate laws for the faithful. What we do need is police to enforce the laws of the land.
This guy has played you for a fool and you've been suckered big-time. How long was he syphoning off your profits?
Okay, you've got a business. Do you just hire anyone off the street or do you check references first? I don't know how it works in the US but can't you do some kind of employment checks, like to make sure he's not a criminal or something? Wouldn't that come up with the fact that he's an illegal?
If you knew he was an illegal, you knew he was lying on his tax return, why did you still trust him not to be lying to you?
Okay, you've got a business. Do you just hire anyone off the street or do you check references first? I don't know how it works in the US but can't you do some kind of employment checks, like to make sure he's not a criminal or something? Wouldn't that come up with the fact that he's an illegal?
If you knew he was an illegal, you knew he was lying on his tax return, why did you still trust him not to be lying to you?
No, I think of you as a fish that's just been hooked.ATG wrote:
Okay, lets just get this out of the way. Think of me as a hypocrite. Bigot. Whatever.
Everyone's allowed an opinion. Freedom of speech and all that. You can disagree but you shouldn't decry someone from voicing their opinion, even if that view is obnoxious, racist or whatever.Masterstyle wrote:
If you've been there, but even that is your opinion. I bet there are people who can say positive things about the Middle East or Africa other than characterizing it as a shithole.usmarine2005 wrote:
I have been there. It is a shithole. Just like Africa.Masterstyle wrote:
Characterizing the Middle East as a shithole because of this. You need to look at the religion not the region.
What the heck does that mean?Battleking999 wrote:
@ Masterstyle
You was 4 mins. faster than me.
High Five
Who says it won't? Latest issue of PC Gamer (UK version) says it might be. You just have to remember that the PC version of San Andreas came out a year after the console versions. We could have to wait a similar amount of time.
Btw, the only way to know if that list is accurate is to take a time machine into the future and see what actually happened. Or you could just wait and see, I guess.
Oh and the only games I really care about the release dates for:
Battlefield 3: rumour (and a leaked internal memo) says it's coming. Don't know when though.
WoW: WotLK: Might be Q2 2008. Might not. There could be news when patch 2.4 comes out but Thrall only knows when that'll be.
Btw, the only way to know if that list is accurate is to take a time machine into the future and see what actually happened. Or you could just wait and see, I guess.
Oh and the only games I really care about the release dates for:
Battlefield 3: rumour (and a leaked internal memo) says it's coming. Don't know when though.
WoW: WotLK: Might be Q2 2008. Might not. There could be news when patch 2.4 comes out but Thrall only knows when that'll be.
usmarine2005 wrote:
Please give examples.B.Schuss wrote:
so often the US claim the moral high ground on these issues, and call others out for human rights violations.
Double standard ftl...
Proclaiming non-negotiable demands of human dignity, claiming that defending human rights is one of the US's primary missions of diplomacy, it doesn't sit very well with Abu Ghraib, with waterboarding, with kidnapping innocent citizens and torturing them.US Department of State wrote:
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2006
Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
March 6, 2007
Across the globe, men and women are pushing for greater personal and political freedom and for the adoption of democratic institutions. They are striving to secure what President Bush calls "the non-negotiable demands of human dignity."
Despite personal risk and against great odds, courageous individuals and nongovernmental groups expose human rights abuses. They seek to protect the rights of ethnic and religious minorities, workers, and women, and to stop the trafficking in human beings. They work to build vibrant civil societies, ensure free and fair elections, and establish accountable, law-based democracies.
These impatient patriots are redefining the limitations of what was previously thought to be possible. Indeed, in the span of a few generations freedom has spread across the developing world, communist dictatorships have collapsed, and new democracies have risen. The rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are protected more fully and by more countries than ever before.
This noble work continues - but it is not yet complete and it faces determined opponents. Not surprisingly, those who feel threatened by democratic change resist those who advocate and act for reform. Over the past year, we have seen attempts to harass and intimidate human rights defenders and civil society organizations and to restrict or shut down their activities. Unjust laws have been wielded as political weapons against those with independent views. There also have been attempts to silence dissenting voices by extralegal means.
Whenever non-governmental organizations and other human rights defenders are under siege, freedom and democracy are undermined. The world's democracies must defend the defenders. That is one of the primary missions of our diplomacy today, and we hope that the Department of State's County Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2006 will help to further this effort. With these thoughts, I hereby submit these reports to the United States Congress.
Condoleezza Rice
Secretary of State
It seems Fadedsteve monitors us more than our own government - he's always writing about how Islam is taking over Britain.KylieTastic wrote:
I think the americans monitor us brits (and europe) more than our own govenment....
....you know from that base we dont know about
As for secret bases, they've got a lot of public ones so I doubt they really need any more. RAF Menwith Hill springs to mind for "intelligence gathering"
Can Seven Years Old Kids Be Terrorism Suspects?
Yes. Nobody should be above the law, not even children.
At the moment on UK television, there's a recruitment drive for the Army, with excerpts of staged events and the phrase "Want to see how the story ends, visit armyjobs.gov.uk" or something similar. One of these videos has a patrol walking down a street and there's a football ahead and some kid, who looks no more than 5, is shouting for the army guys to kick it back. The squaddie at the front is about to when the patrol leader shouts a warning. The obvious conclusion that's to be drawn is that the football might be an IED.
In that example, the child is implicated as a terrorism suspect.
Yes. Nobody should be above the law, not even children.
At the moment on UK television, there's a recruitment drive for the Army, with excerpts of staged events and the phrase "Want to see how the story ends, visit armyjobs.gov.uk" or something similar. One of these videos has a patrol walking down a street and there's a football ahead and some kid, who looks no more than 5, is shouting for the army guys to kick it back. The squaddie at the front is about to when the patrol leader shouts a warning. The obvious conclusion that's to be drawn is that the football might be an IED.
In that example, the child is implicated as a terrorism suspect.
The lounge.
LoL !!Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Ibiza
My vote: Machu Picchu.
My reasoning: there's talk (there's always talk, isn't there?) about limiting the number of visitors to protect the site, so get there while you still can. Everything else is going to be around next year, even Iran, so can wait.
Cambodia (for Angkor Wat) is expensive to get to and dangerous (dodgy infrastructure) when you get there. I'd leave that for a year and hope the in-country travel arrangements improve.
Aardwolf - 3000+ hours
MadROM - about 1500 hours
WoW - 1000+ hours
Bf2/2142 - 800+ hours
Civ III/IV - about 500 hours
MadROM - about 1500 hours
WoW - 1000+ hours
Bf2/2142 - 800+ hours
Civ III/IV - about 500 hours
90 bucks for a video game? Christ, that's like a 6 month subscription to WoW.
Wow, I think someone touched a nerve. Call America paranoid and watch Parker go nuts. Reminds me of a recent documentary where someone called the Cult of Scientology a church and we watched a BBC reporter go nuts.Parker wrote:
first, you dont talk about our constitution as "Rights". we were born here, those are our fucking rights, you dont like it? kiss my ass.
I do hope Mr P calms down some time soon so he can contribute something on topic.
anyway...
Is it OK for a private citizen to shoot a criminal? Well in the United States, you've got these things called trials, juries and the law. We've got them in the UK, though ours have a little more history and experience behind them. It's for a trial by twelve men, good and true, to determine whether someone is a criminal, not for private citizens. If you see a crime being committed, you may not have the full facts at your grasp. If you shoot someone who's brandishing a weapon at another person, how do you know they are not just defending themselves?
A resounding no from me.
Why protest the war, why are kids waving signs in front of recruiting stations and doing protest walks?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Why protest the war in Iraq. Human beings are selfish animals by nature and NOBODY has lost a cunt hairs worth of their quality of life since 2003. why do i see a bunch of kids waving their signs in front of recruiting stations and doing protest walks blocking traffic. I have more respect for the insurgent that detonates an IED than for all these new wannabe hippies. I have an open mind though, so I wonder. If you have felt the need to protest the war in Iraq, why? I understand that there are sincere people out there against the war, but I think thats the minority. Th majority of people I have come across that have participated in these types of events are for the most part ill inform and ignorant of the actual goings on of the war. They base all their opinions on totally biased and inaccurate media sources. it seriously makes me fucking sick. I think its abunch of bored shit heads who wanna feel like they are a part of a new generation of hippies. they dont really feel strong against the war, just rage against the machine if you will.
seriously the only people effected by this war in an adverse way are the citizens of Iraq and the soldiers/sailors/airmen/marines of our armed forces. no draft. no rationing. no black outs. GET REAL FUCKOS!
heres your oppurtunity to change my mind about all the anti war sentiment.
Perhaps they are sick and tired of seeing loved ones, friends, relations, neighbours, fellow citizens, etc. coming home in an ambulance or worse, in a box. Seeing this happen for no reason other than a supposedly cheap and easy vote-winner when the search for Osama was going badly. I don't believe George Bush gave a rat's ass about the plight of the average Iraqi when he decided to invade and I don't believe he does now. So don't give us the standard rhetoric about it being about Iraqi freedom.
Sure, there's no draft, no rationing, no black outs but there's a lot of money being poured into the war and that money is coming from average Joe's on the street. That's reason enough for the protests but I think the continual influx of body bags also has a large part to do with it.
Man U to win 1-0. The goal will come from a dubious penalty decision and Chelsea will have had an equally dubious penalty claim rejected.
Happy 17th!
(I'm a little uneducated.. independence from whom?)
(I'm a little uneducated.. independence from whom?)
ROFL @ Ukraine would be more accurate. And that's why we didn't do better - Ukraine were so funny, so camp, so "bakofoil" they detracted from us. I can barely remember any of the performances apart from Ukraine's but being directly after them, that was always going to put us at a disadvantage. Not having proper lyrics also put us at a disadvantage, true.Titch2349 wrote:
lol @ ukraine
Typical Dutch attitude.kmt wrote:
And I already see people being racist on their own and they are probably not even noticing it themself.. Anyway I'd think that racism is hate as already said. Thinking that a other race is above the other.
But hasn't his been discussed countless times before?
(just kidding)
Victorian engineer?Skorpy-chan wrote:
I vastly prefer the british system of putting people on the money. You've got the queen on one side, she's in the watermark, and then you have a picture of a famous victorian engineer on the other side.
£5 - Elizabeth Fry, prison reformer
£10 - Charles Darwin, geologist and naturalist
£20 - Adam Smith, philosopher and economist
£50 - John Houblon, the first Governor of the Bank of England
Yes.RicardoBlanco wrote:
*Hypothetical Question*rac·ism
–noun
1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that ones own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
If a man has lived all his life amongst black people and still hates them can you logically call him a racist? Seeing as racism is based on prejudice, where would the prejudice lie in this mans opinion considering he'd have more exposure to black people than anyone else and would therefore base his judgement on experience.
The third definition "hatred or intolerance of another race or of other races" is simple. To hate a race of people is racism. The reasons behind the hatred are immaterial.
Sorry mate, I like it and unlike other forms of addiction - coke, gambling, exercise, chocolate - it's not something that's going to kill you unless you're a sad Korean gold farmer. Or was he Chinese? Anyway. And the people that complain that it costs a monthly fee, it's $15 or £7.50. Who notices that kind of money? Shit, going to the cinema costs more than that. For that money you've got dedicated support, new content coming, servers you don't have to buy yourself that can handle thousands of people at any time with no lag and programmers that write patches that don't immediately create new bugs or hang servers. You've got huge worlds to explore, pvp or pve servers - you can opt out of pvp if you don't getting ganked, crafting and gathering skills, melee and ranged weapons, even grenades and aerial bombardment available.
What's the alternative, shooting people and rezzing 30 seconds after getting shot? Same map, same weapons day in, day out? No progression, nothing new to find, no different styles of gameplay, just point, click and shoot.
Give me WoW over Battlefield any day.
What's the alternative, shooting people and rezzing 30 seconds after getting shot? Same map, same weapons day in, day out? No progression, nothing new to find, no different styles of gameplay, just point, click and shoot.
Give me WoW over Battlefield any day.
Oh dear. Salo. Definitely not a film I would recommend anyone to watch. I'd rank it down as even worse than Caligula.jsnipy wrote:
* Brazil
* Salo: 120 of Sodom
* Betty Bleu
* Woman in the Dunes
* Eraserhead
* Romper Stomper
Films I would recommend that you might not have heard of:
Levity (2003)
Leon (1994) a.k.a. "The Cleaner" or "The Professional"
Subway (1985)
The Day of the Jackal (1973)
I think more especially a), to get as much time as Margaret Thatcher.Braddock wrote:
Exactly (especially on (b)).CameronPoe wrote:
He only hung on because he wanted:
a) to hit the 10 year tenure mark and
b) to get his glory day of adulation out of the NI peace process.
PC: v480
But I don't play much anymore. WoW, DreamPoker and Civ IV take the vast majority of my online time.
But I don't play much anymore. WoW, DreamPoker and Civ IV take the vast majority of my online time.
Oh for Christ's sake, we may be at a turning point in history and you're bickering like a couple of schoolkids about a fight that started decades ago. Who gives a shit who started it? If Mr McGuinness and Reverend Paisley can sit down together, can't we stop this stupid argument?
As it happens, I don't see it lasting. Someone, on one side or the other, it probably doesn't matter who, will find events not going to their liking and kick-start the violence again. Then everyone will find the weapons they'd sequestered away and we'll be back to the bombings, kneecappings and the army patrolling the streets, like they do in Basra.
I hope I'm wrong on this, I really do, but I doubt it.
As it happens, I don't see it lasting. Someone, on one side or the other, it probably doesn't matter who, will find events not going to their liking and kick-start the violence again. Then everyone will find the weapons they'd sequestered away and we'll be back to the bombings, kneecappings and the army patrolling the streets, like they do in Basra.
I hope I'm wrong on this, I really do, but I doubt it.
D'oh. I thought you meantblademaster wrote:
Iceman
Do you have any female relations called Ann?Havok wrote:
I'm Cyclops' Brother. Vote Cyclops.
Cyclops = Scott Summers
Havok = Alex Summers
This is Ghost RiderBertster7 wrote:
This is Spawn.jord wrote:
Ghost rider because i've heard of him
http://spawn.home.sapo.pt/Images/Spawn_with_guns_2.jpg
Really he should win this whole thing hands down.
Has Spawn done the Uppsala Run (Stockholm to Uppsala, 42 miles) in 15 minutes? No.
Ghost Rider ftw.
Ghost Rider ftw.
Perhaps it's Ireland's destiny to fail? (just kidding)CameronPoe wrote:
'Fáil' is actually the Irish word for destiny lol. It's pronounced 'Fawl' or 'Foyl'. Fianna Fáil means 'Soldiers of Destiny'.apollo_fi wrote:
Fianna Fail?
Gotta love a party named 'Fail'
Seriously though, I'd vote for a party completely independent of the unification debate. Greens ftw.
LOLCATS? WTF? Is that an Aussie thing like Neighbours?R3v4n wrote:
Welcome!
Tips
Always Search before you make a topic, this helps the forum space.
Dont post LOLCATS It will get you banned.
Have some fun!
I agree, no point in drinking until you're legless or you don;t know what you're doing. There have been times (Monday just gone for one) when I can't remember what totally happened or how I got home but I know my personal instincts kept me safe and sane. But drinking so you can't stand or talk, that's a step (or a crawl?) too far. I've seen it happen to other people and I've said that'll never happen to me, it's just daft.
As for binge drinking, the Government's definition is ludicrous. Today, after work, a couple of friends and I went to the pub, as you do. A round each meant we had three pints each. To the government, that's binge drinking. Monday was a binge (6 pints, 4 double-shot cocktails) but not today.
As for binge drinking, the Government's definition is ludicrous. Today, after work, a couple of friends and I went to the pub, as you do. A round each meant we had three pints each. To the government, that's binge drinking. Monday was a binge (6 pints, 4 double-shot cocktails) but not today.
I disagree with 6, 10 and 11. The rest is fine with me. However, the inclusion of 6,10 and 11 made me vote against one of the party's leading activists, who was standing in my ward. That and the fact that the standing councillor has done quite a lot towards better local services in my area.BNP wrote:
Our proposals:
1. We would repeal the Race Relations Acts and all other restrictions on free speech in Britain .
2. We would abolish all targets and quotas for ethnic representation in all areas of employment, public and private.
3. We would abolish all politically-correct indoctrination of the police, teachers, and other public employees.
4. We would abolish all government-sponsored ethnicity-specific professional bodies, housing associations, and other organisations.
5. We would abolish all departments, agencies, or other units of government whose sole and specific purpose is to deal with ethnic issues, grievances, or crimes. Such organisations deliberately seek out the maximum quantity of "racism" in order to justify their own existence and expand their power and budgets. The law is the law and must be enforced equally upon all without being politicised over ethnic differences.
6. We would abolish all laws against racial discrimination in employment and the government bodies associated with enforcing them.
7. Except for purposes of teaching foreign languages to native speakers of English, the only languages permitted in official documents, government business, and schools will be English, Scots, and Welsh. The use of other languages by ethnic minorities in their own homes, school and institutions will also be encouraged.
8. A Clause 28-style proscription against the promotion of racial integration in schools and the media would be introduced.
9. In order to make it clear that the “celebration of diversity” is something in which the native peoples of our islands can share, each of our traditional Saints Days would be made Public Holidays in the nations in question, with Trafalgar Day being an additional Public Holiday throughout the entire UK.
10. A massively-funded and permanent programme, using and doubling Britain's current foreign aid budget, will aim to reduce, by voluntary resettlement to their lands of ethnic origin, the proportion of ethnic minorities living in Britain, for as long as the majority of the electorate are willing to fund such expenditure. Since the chief impact of such a programme would be the assistance it would render to Developing Countries in the Third World, this is described further in Section 16 – Britain and the World.
11. While accepting the right of law-abiding minorities, in our country because they or their ancestors came here legally, to remain here and to enjoy the full protection of the law against any form of harassment or hostility, we will also seek to emphasise the importance of the prior status of the aboriginal people. This would be a national extension of the ‘Sons and Daughters' policy in priority on housing and school places lists which BNP councils seek to implement at local level.
1. I'm all for free speech. No limits. None. If someone wants to deny the holocaust, so be it. They'll expose themselves as a twat and so much the better.
2. Best person for the job. If that person is a lesbian disabled woman from Outer Mongolia, sign her up and give her a pay rise. Same as if it's a white bloke from Wigan.
3. Political indoctrination means not doing the job properly. Train policemen how to police. Train teachers how to teach. If it weren't for Ministers the NHS would be in better health.
4. As well as free speech, I'm pro-inclusivity. Nobody should be exlcuded from anything based on their race, gender, sexual persuasion, age or any of that bollocks.
5. See 1 & 4.
6. Racial discrimination goes against inclusivity and "best person for the job". There shouldn't be any need for laws prohibiting racial-discrimination but that's no reason to abolish them. Barring freedom of speech, racial discrimination laws should remain.
7. I passed the place where our local housing office was on Thursday. It had moved to another office nearby and there was a map and a sign telling people how to get there. The sign was in 14 languages. To me, that's excessive.
8. I'm not familiar with Clause 28. Can someone explain it to me? Until then I am loathe to condemn or condone it.
9. St. Patrick's Day is as close as we get to a Patron Saint's day celebration in the UK. We should have a celebration of St. George, St. David and St. Andrew as well.
10. First generation immigrants and refugees paid to come here. If they or their families wish to leave, I don't see why the taxpayer should be left with the bill.
11. Who are the aboriginal people? This is completely unworkable because if you work back to the Vikings, the Normans, the Saxons, we all have immigrant blood in us.
Sure, the Government has to be accountable for its failings but that doesn't divest employers of their responsibilities. If you're providing employment to them, you're providing an incentive for them to cross the border.
Can something be clarified, is it illegal to employ an illegal immigrant? If it's not, it should be.
Speaking of which, I think someone's head should have rolled in our Government last year when it was revelaed there were illegal immigrants employed as cleaners in our Home Office - the department responsible for immigration and enforcing the law.
Can something be clarified, is it illegal to employ an illegal immigrant? If it's not, it should be.
Speaking of which, I think someone's head should have rolled in our Government last year when it was revelaed there were illegal immigrants employed as cleaners in our Home Office - the department responsible for immigration and enforcing the law.
My point exactly. The whole idea about providing for one's family by doing illegal shit is bollocks. If you're justifying local industry employing illegal aliens, you're justifying the illegals coming to the US to make money. And if you do that, you might as well not complain about it.Kmarion wrote:
There is something wrong with the local industry yes. But if you understand capitalism then you are aware that once a competitor finds a way to cut overhead either you adapt or file chapter 7.aardfrith wrote:
If it's necessary for a business to employ illegal labour to compete in the market place, there's something wrong with that business.The following quote will contradict what you just wrote nicely.aardfrith wrote:
Alternatively, look at it from the illegal immigrants point of view. To provide for their families, they must attempt to travel to the United States (illegally) and get work there (illegally).aardfrith wrote:
Doing something illegal with the excuse that it's to provide for one's family is bullshit. It's still illegal no matter how you cut it.
If it's necessary for a business to employ illegal labour to compete in the market place, there's something wrong with that business.Kmarion wrote:
What if employing illegals are required for employers to survive competitively and provide for their families? If the government were competent enough to take care of the illegal problem it would not be necessary for employers to use them in order to compete. Just something to let your brain marinate in. Keep the playing field level while enforcing the law.Turquoise wrote:
I'd say it's more cowardly for an employer of illegals to continually condemn illegals. If you hire them, you are part of the problem, not the solution.ATG wrote:
Its cowardly to hold employers responsible when you are not demanding the arrest and fining of government assholes who fail to do their jobs .
I'm all for holding officials responsible for their negligence, but I'm also in favor of practicing what I preach.
Alternatively, look at it from the illegal immigrants point of view. To provide for their families, they must attempt to travel to the United States (illegally) and get work there (illegally).
Doing something illegal with the excuse that it's to provide for one's family is bullshit. It's still illegal no matter how you cut it.
Oh shit, not this tired thread again. Can't you just refer to http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=60967 without digging up all the same xenophobic bollocks again?
Goddamn septics.
Goddamn septics.
One blog may not be enough to base an attack on but when you put the information gleaned from there against other titbits from other sources, it may turn out to be true. So you watch that blog for further indiscretions. Or you use it to validate information gained from elsewhere.B.Schuss wrote:
oh please. Don't you think the insurgents, al'Quaeda, or whoever is causing shit in Iraq has much better ways to get hold of that information than by scanning US blogs ? After all, we know that the internet ain't always a good place to find credible information, don't we ?
If an insurgent based any of his operations on information he dug up in some blog, he'd be outright stupid.
I can understand that the military has some rightful interest in keeping the lid on some of the information that is out there ( or could get out there ), but I doubt that such information would be spread in blogs anyway.
When it becomes a trusted source, then you can consider taking action based on it alone.
This argument holds no water. If it is proven that the act of releasing the code is against the law, it doesn't matter how many other people have done the crime, Digg would be liable.{XpLiCiTxX} wrote:
And no, digg should not be prosecuted for giving this information out to the public because it was not the first website to release this information.
I think you might have an argument if you say "Digg should not be the only ones prosecuted"
Knightnifer, did you get a screenie of your name?
A guy at work had this done a few years ago. It's probably a good job you didn't read this before you had it done, ATG.
My colleague described what the process was. First off the anaesthetic. It's a local anaesthetic, not a general one, so the patient is wide awake when everything happens. They take a syringe and inject the nerves directly - the nerves are inside the testicle so, of course, the needle pierces the gonad. Worst pain in the world.
Then they rummage around, cutting tubes and tying them off.
And just when you think it's all over, they say "now the other one."
My colleague described what the process was. First off the anaesthetic. It's a local anaesthetic, not a general one, so the patient is wide awake when everything happens. They take a syringe and inject the nerves directly - the nerves are inside the testicle so, of course, the needle pierces the gonad. Worst pain in the world.
Then they rummage around, cutting tubes and tying them off.
And just when you think it's all over, they say "now the other one."
Does the Mustang have stripes? Everyone knows a car with stripes goes faster than one without. After all, they don't call them "go faster stripes" for nothing.
Screenshots are meaningless in this respect. You can change the localization files so the weapon names (when you shoot or get shot) can say anything you like. So if you really fancied it, you could rename the MK3A1 as "big pumpy thing" or whatever.RonnY[NL] wrote:
screenshot next time ftw pl0x k?
Strange, when I called the police to report a car break-in, they answered within 3 rings (9 seconds) and sent two guys round within an hour.SuperMike wrote:
It aint,I have experianced the "police service" (what a farce) as a victimVernedead wrote:
its bullshit.
it took the wankers 42 minute just to answer the phone & they were to busy
to come out to investigate car break in, theft & damage which left my car un-usable.
yet they were seen in my road 1 hour later nicking kids for getting conkers off trees ?
In the UK, 8800GTS prices range from about £170 to £270. USD equivalent is probably 50% higher - should be 100% higher (£1 = $2) but we get ripped off for prices on tech stuff.Tdog2007 wrote:
sooo does anyone know when the new ones come out and wut the prices on an 8800GTS is gonna be then in USD??
Why not? If you're looking to upgrade the video processing on your computer, you HAVE to compare DX9 and DX10 video cards to see what you'll upgrade to.leetkyle wrote:
You can't compare a DX10 Video card with a DX9 Video card.
And the bottom line at the moment is it's not worth getting a DX10 card right now because there's nothing that requires DX10 cards.