I took hostages but they were all so fuckin annoying screaming "Enemy Boat Spotted" at the top of their lungs and dolphin diving all over my house
Search
Search results: 1,700 found, showing up to 50
I was pwnin those real life noobs for awhile, then I got banned for haxing so i'm back herestryyker wrote:
omfg.. Where has u beans?SysTray wrote:
Stryykers house
Stryykers house
My point is that who says they're coming to a complete stop, except you? You said yourself they were happy with their decisions, didn't you? Yes they may have come to a stop in one direction, but they continued in another. It's not like they killed themselves because all they ever did was smoke weed...that would be a complete stop.Dilbert_X wrote:
Not at all, my point is once they start smoking their wants and needs pretty much cease.So you're saying that people have to stick to one course of action throughout their life less they be judged by the almighty Dilbert? Peoples ideals and wants and needs change daily, let alone throughout years of life experience and exploration. So they don't want to be doctors or lawyers or biologists or whatever anymore? What makes that bad again?
I don't have a problem with people changing direction. To come to a dead stop seems odd to me.
Yes I picked two subjective examples.
No I don't believe they are completely atypical, based on other experiences and many discussions with professionals who deal with this kind of thing.
I wanna know what your other experiences are, and which professionals you talked to on the matter. It would help me better understand your position because as I said earlier, most people are biased towards their own side of the argument to one degree or another. If that's the case no matter what professional you talked to not a damn thing he says carries any meaning.
The discussion as a whole would be a lot better if marijuana was legal worldwide so studies could actually be performed and documented by doctors who are licensed to study marijuana and its effects. However, there aren't many doctors like that so I have a hard time believing your professionals know exactly what they're talking about.
So you're saying that people have to stick to one course of action throughout their life less they be judged by the almighty Dilbert? Peoples ideals and wants and needs change daily, let alone throughout years of life experience and exploration. So they don't want to be doctors or lawyers or biologists or whatever anymore? What makes that bad again?Dilbert_X wrote:
Read what I said, I didn't define success or failure, it affects peoples progression, of course they are isolated, I already said that too.SysTray wrote:
Not to mention the fact that your idea of success seems to be close minded.
If my friends had been idle dimwits whose destiny was to be a) A care home worker or b) Unemployable then I would have no argument.
If you weren't why'd you reply to that portionYou can do whatever you like in the summer, I'm not interested.
Your examples are still just isolated cases. As I myself smoke weed it's going to be hard to convince me that you can't succeed while using it. I work full-time at a restaurant to pay my rent, bills, insurance, etc. and still go to school. Granted I'm only taking two classes at the moment but it's summertime go fuck yourself.
Not to mention the fact that your idea of success seems to be close minded. Why do you have to go to school and get a degree when you can be just as happy doing whatever it was they were doing (I forgot cuz Im smoking weed - lulz). Furthermore who made you the ultimate judge of success in life? Are you the master of all disciplines, so therefore you can't learn anything else?
As for your side effects up at the top, everything we breathe in, aside from air, causes lung damage to some degree. Do you know how many pollutants and carcinogens are in the air simply because of factories and plants producing shit miles and miles and miles away. No one says anything about them though, just the weed you need to stop smoking...
Not to mention the fact that your idea of success seems to be close minded. Why do you have to go to school and get a degree when you can be just as happy doing whatever it was they were doing (I forgot cuz Im smoking weed - lulz). Furthermore who made you the ultimate judge of success in life? Are you the master of all disciplines, so therefore you can't learn anything else?
As for your side effects up at the top, everything we breathe in, aside from air, causes lung damage to some degree. Do you know how many pollutants and carcinogens are in the air simply because of factories and plants producing shit miles and miles and miles away. No one says anything about them though, just the weed you need to stop smoking...
I didn't read any post but the OP due to the fact that I have weed to smoke, but here's my 2 cents:
Regardless of the so-called "facts" that anyone brings up, they are most likely from a biased source and are skewed to reflect the creators opinions. That's just how life is so get used to it. You see it everywhere, especially on the news. People just want to be right. The only real way to know whether marijuana is harmful is to try it for yourself and see if it fits into your lifestyle.
And of course what is "harmful"? You could try and define it for years and years and years but anything and everything could be "harmful", as I'm sure someone else has said already...again I didn't read anything lol.
Regardless of the so-called "facts" that anyone brings up, they are most likely from a biased source and are skewed to reflect the creators opinions. That's just how life is so get used to it. You see it everywhere, especially on the news. People just want to be right. The only real way to know whether marijuana is harmful is to try it for yourself and see if it fits into your lifestyle.
And of course what is "harmful"? You could try and define it for years and years and years but anything and everything could be "harmful", as I'm sure someone else has said already...again I didn't read anything lol.
Whys everyone gotta hate? Dont like it, dont go there. Pretty simple if you ask me.
Yeah i recognized your tag it was on that Wake server. Come join up on this one we could use you.Metal-Eater-GR wrote:
i think i saw you on a server today
LOLZ SO FUNNY. Wait or you could have said nothing..._Dominiko_PL wrote:
1.41 lol wut
193.93.47.177 : 16575
That is all.
That is all.
My feeling on picking the new wonders (except the Pyramids of course) is that now people won't learn about and appreciate the original ones. They don't exist anymore, but that doesn't mean we can't admire the way they were built with ancient methods and tools.
I voted for Chichen Itza and the Great Wall out of that entire list.
I voted for Chichen Itza and the Great Wall out of that entire list.
Oh and Mike Fisher and Nancy Wilson from "Heart".
In my opinion, yes.d3athwi5h4 wrote:
but buckethead is..........................SysTray wrote:
It's not that he's not worth mentioning. There are so many good guitarists out there that you could write a book with endless names. This is really all about opinion on the best of the best, and he's simply not up there in my book.d3athwi5h4 wrote:
15 responses and no one thinks Stevie Ray Vaughn is worth mentioning? Come on
It's not that he's not worth mentioning. There are so many good guitarists out there that you could write a book with endless names. This is realy all about opinion on the best of the best, and he's simply not up there in my book.d3athwi5h4 wrote:
15 responses and no one thinks Stevie Ray Vaughn is worth mentioning? Come on
1. Jimmy Page
2. Jimi Hendrix
3. Slash (GnR)
4. Buckethead
5. Eddie Van Halen
2. Jimi Hendrix
3. Slash (GnR)
4. Buckethead
5. Eddie Van Halen
"McDonalds page"
scroll down to the pictures and there's a picture of Dortmund, Germany
click the word Germany
Germany page.
NEW ONE
Encyclopedia to NASCAR
Edit: Wow I took too long thinking of a new puzzle....so I lose.
scroll down to the pictures and there's a picture of Dortmund, Germany
click the word Germany
Germany page.
NEW ONE
Encyclopedia to NASCAR
Edit: Wow I took too long thinking of a new puzzle....so I lose.
Wait so all it does it literally open your mind?
I drink Pepsi from the can so I guess I'm fine.
That first guy was just asking to fail.
None of them had mustaches.
Anyone who gives that more than a shitpile/10 deserves to be castrated so their stupid genes don't pollinate the Earth any further. That movie sucked more than the Vietnamese whores in Full Metal Jacket...and they "Sucky Sucky".
"The Departed" was a good one.
Nevermind sold so well because it was a new type of music to the public. It was a breakthrough in music because most people of the time were still coming off the 80s hair bands and one hit wonders. I won't disagree with you that Soundgarden is good, and that Ten is a great album, but they didn't play the same type of music as Nirvana. No one plays the same type of music as Nirvana.
Rate its conductivity on a 1-10 scale, 10 being most conductive. Then send me a 2' 3.25" sample strand and I'll think about buying some.ATG wrote:
lol, made you cringe, didn't I?*
i guess this would be considered advertising, if anyone wants to buy .027 11 7/8 3/4 hard copper rolled coil.
Nirvana is the epitome of grunge, though. You hear grunge, the first band you think of is Nirvana, y'know? You can't say that about Alice in Chains, really...Also, a great thing about them is that they never wanted to be a commercial boom (or at least good ol' Kurt didn't).sergeriver wrote:
I love grunge music, but let me disagree. While Nirvana was a huge commercial boom, Alice in Chains reached the perfection and that you can't measure with numbers.SysTray wrote:
Alice in Chains wasn't as...revolutionary in the music world as Nirvana was, however. They are still a good band, don't get me wrong, but I'll take Nirvana any day.
What hath god wrought?
Alice in Chains wasn't as...revolutionary in the music world as Nirvana was, however. They are still a good band, don't get me wrong, but I'll take Nirvana any day.
I woke up.^*AlphA*^ wrote:
so I'm just using this thread, rather then make a new one on this,
so it's Friday the 13th again,
anything bad happend to some of you already ?
Someone close this thread. It's way past it's prime.
Internets, anyone?
Internets, anyone?
They sent 10 grand to scientists to persuade them to challenge the UN, not average Joes...
Well, in football years, yes. He's not even 40 yet, though.stryyker wrote:
Inst he like, old?
Green Bay Packers quarterback Brett Favre announced today that he will return for another season. For anyone who watches American Football, this is big news.
"Packers quarterback Brett Favre will be back in 2007.
"Brett Favre informed me this morning that he plans to return for a 17th NFL season," General Manager Ted Thompson said. "The Packers are excited by his decision and look forward to a successful 2007 campaign."
With Favre's return, the Packers hope to continue the success they were building at the end of 2006, when they finished the season with a four-game winning streak to reach the .500 mark at 8-8.
"I am so excited about coming back," Favre told the Biloxi Sun Herald newspaper. "We have a good nucleus of young players. We were 8-8 last year and that's encouraging.
"My offensive line looks good, the defense played good down the stretch. I'm excited about playing for a talented young football team."
**
Packers GM Ted Thompson this afternoon held a brief press conference to address questions from the media regarding today's announcement.
Stay tuned to Packers.com for a complete transcript, audio and video of today's press conference."
The old gunslinger is giving it another go, let's see where his improved team can take him. (or where he can take them)
http://packers.com/breaking_news/
"Packers quarterback Brett Favre will be back in 2007.
"Brett Favre informed me this morning that he plans to return for a 17th NFL season," General Manager Ted Thompson said. "The Packers are excited by his decision and look forward to a successful 2007 campaign."
With Favre's return, the Packers hope to continue the success they were building at the end of 2006, when they finished the season with a four-game winning streak to reach the .500 mark at 8-8.
"I am so excited about coming back," Favre told the Biloxi Sun Herald newspaper. "We have a good nucleus of young players. We were 8-8 last year and that's encouraging.
"My offensive line looks good, the defense played good down the stretch. I'm excited about playing for a talented young football team."
**
Packers GM Ted Thompson this afternoon held a brief press conference to address questions from the media regarding today's announcement.
Stay tuned to Packers.com for a complete transcript, audio and video of today's press conference."
The old gunslinger is giving it another go, let's see where his improved team can take him. (or where he can take them)
http://packers.com/breaking_news/
Does every single thread have to have a spin off now?
The Luger is a classic. That's why it's the best.
You can't prevent cancer from happening at this very time no matter what. Even if you live a perfectly healthy life your cells can still mutate...So anyone advertising anything (including chemo) and saying their product cures cancer in the way you want it to be cured would be a liar.Spark wrote:
Oh come on. You cannot be serious.
A cure for cancer. Do you know how fucking huge a story that would be? Bigger than big. Only a braindead wouldn't think of covering it.
Plus: that is not a CURE. How much it may seem that this is a be-all and end-all, it is not. First - it leads to a reduction in the size of tumors and the eventual disappearance. That is NOT the same thing. Chemotherapy does exactly the same thing (in a more complicated and difficult way) - but the cancer can still come back. A CURE would be a drug which removes any cancer and removes any future possibility for cancer - this is a TREATMENT. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING. There is NOTHING in this drug which may stop cancer recurrance. Plus, it doesn't cover all cancers - brain, lung and breast tumours are very important, but what about skin cancer? I'm far more concerned about that. It's a start, yes, but it is NOT the final answer.
Add to the fact that clinical trials haven't started yet (so we don't know for sure whether it works the same).
And you can't blame the pharmaceutical companies. They produce the product, they lose money, they go bankrupt, they stop producing. Either that's it or someone else has to start producing. As more and more companies are forced to produce eventually there is NOONE left to produce the drug. Then what? People's attitude will be 'Someone has to make it, but it's not going to be me.'
For taste: Captain
For just straight getting fucked: Vodka (hits you fast)
For just straight getting fucked: Vodka (hits you fast)
You would've made my day if you did it. Finally someone who steps up to the plate and doesn't mind saying they did it, y'know?
"Gateway Drug" is a term used by people who are for prohibition of everything. Smoking a cigarette or having a shot of whiskey does not up your chances of injection some heroin - nor does hitting a blunt/bowl. The only possible way this could have any iota of truth is that in order to get these things under aged, you have to know a dealer of sorts. Someone who probably knows where to find all sorts of lovely things.
I myself have done an assortment of things, before doing these things I studied for countless hours making sure they were things that, when taken recreationally, would not harm me in any way. I know that - as one of the good commercials states - if I sit on "Pete's couch", I will not be harmed. I will have sat and done nothing for 8 hours and had fun doing it.
The following are things I have tried, and I do them all recreationally.
-Alcohol
-Marijuana
-LSD
-DXM
Studies (by experts) have shown that these things, when done recreationally (in moderation), and not habitually, will not do anything but provide you with the euphoric effect you long for.
I myself have done an assortment of things, before doing these things I studied for countless hours making sure they were things that, when taken recreationally, would not harm me in any way. I know that - as one of the good commercials states - if I sit on "Pete's couch", I will not be harmed. I will have sat and done nothing for 8 hours and had fun doing it.
The following are things I have tried, and I do them all recreationally.
-Alcohol
-Marijuana
-LSD
-DXM
Studies (by experts) have shown that these things, when done recreationally (in moderation), and not habitually, will not do anything but provide you with the euphoric effect you long for.
Alcohol is a drug just as Marijuana is, young grasshopper.commandochristian wrote:
deeznutz1245 wrote:
I dont do drugs, I do drink though.
Rofl. I don't believe I watched that.
"You got Bel-Aired!"
"You got Bel-Aired!"
Saw you in 1.12 once...
That made me cry.
I believe commandochristian said it right with that famous speech:
commandochristian wrote:
your link doesn't work
Dead girls don't say no.
I thought you were gone for good. I was making plans for the party and everything.
I can...it just gives me a message that says "Your screen name is now signed on it two locations."