Have oneTrotskygrad wrote:
any reliability issues from what you've heard?west-phoenix-az wrote:
The GSG 1911-22 runs about $300-400 in the US.
its a good fun pistol .... I've put different companies through it and have had no problems
Have oneTrotskygrad wrote:
any reliability issues from what you've heard?west-phoenix-az wrote:
The GSG 1911-22 runs about $300-400 in the US.
Ty wrote:
Nothing, just reflecting on the distinct feeling of unease bf2s provides me on a daily basis.
Kampframmer wrote:
I'm standing by my point that this batman isn't suited for anything outside of this trilogy, and I'm sure taht the same is going to go for the Nolan Superman.SEREMAKER wrote:
Well we are going to see a nolianish supermanKampframmer wrote:
The batman movies are obviously not like the rest of the comic-book films, regardless of DC or marvel. Nolan gave batman his own realistic twist and worked out really well (look at the joker or bane (not using venom etc etc)). IN most comic-book films the story is complete shit if you;re not a fan because in most cases tehy try and please the comic fans whilst trying to keep the mainstream crowd entertained. They do this by adding senseless over-the-top action scenes and horrible bit of comedy.
It's why avengers worked. All those seperate movies had that comic book style and so they fitted together really well.
You couldnt fit the current batman into anything, it simply wouldnt work.
Could you imagine Nolans batman together with Superman (who can basically save the world alone whereas batman can barely save gotham) a man who can do just about anything and Green Lantern (The Ryan Reynolds one)?
But yeah I could see a Superman, Batman teamup in the nolan universe but the only way it could truly work would be a realistic Superman villain - Luther ...... now imagine having Luther and Ra's teamup ....... something to the tune of Luther is the finance backer for the League, Luther throws down the cash and Ra's puts up the muscle ...... Ra's destroys citys and Luther comes in behind to take over and rebuild .... Ra's realizes that Superman is to good, to powerful and to re-store balance he must help Luther to destroy Superman
Also this would be at the beginning of Supermans appearance
This is one of those debates that has no real end to it and to be frank, the comic facts are turning it into a clash of nerds that I will take no part in.
We'll just agree to disagree
Well we are going to see a nolianish supermanKampframmer wrote:
The batman movies are obviously not like the rest of the comic-book films, regardless of DC or marvel. Nolan gave batman his own realistic twist and worked out really well (look at the joker or bane (not using venom etc etc)). IN most comic-book films the story is complete shit if you;re not a fan because in most cases tehy try and please the comic fans whilst trying to keep the mainstream crowd entertained. They do this by adding senseless over-the-top action scenes and horrible bit of comedy.SEREMAKER wrote:
theres not really a " standard " comic movieKampframmer wrote:
Turning into one of those standard comic movies would really ruin this trilogy. So far it has seperated itself form DC and all other comic-book films and it has done the series really well.
Imagine if they would make a Justice League movie with this batman and the new superman? Batman would look so out of place because this trilogy was made somewhat realistic and really good by steering clear from that comic bullshit.
theres the marvel way, with a overall universe that they try to tie-in the movies or nolans batman with ultra realism , even though he did a few easter eggs in B.B. ( the rest of comic movies to this point are either stand alones ie : watchmen or hopes for a franchise ie : green lantern )
It's why avengers worked. All those seperate movies had that comic book style and so they fitted together really well.
You couldnt fit the current batman into anything, it simply wouldnt work.
Could you imagine Nolans batman together with Superman (who can basically save the world alone whereas batman can barely save gotham) a man who can do just about anything and Green Lantern (The Ryan Reynolds one)?
theres not really a " standard " comic movieKampframmer wrote:
Turning into one of those standard comic movies would really ruin this trilogy. So far it has seperated itself form DC and all other comic-book films and it has done the series really well.SEREMAKER wrote:
I wish since this was nolans last one that he had more easter eggs in the movie
Spoiler (highlight to read):
the line about gators being in the sewers would have been perfect to mention instead of having " killer crocs " in the sewers
have more characters from the line up ... such as Strange, The Ventriloquist, Calendar Man so on & so on
instead of the gordon family moving to Cleveland, should have mentioned Metropolis
have the most briefest of cameo of Superman or at least Kent ( since Nolan is producing Man of Steel )
Imagine if they would make a Justice League movie with this batman and the new superman? Batman would look so out of place because this trilogy was made somewhat realistic and really good by steering clear from that comic bullshit.
and thats why theres discrimination lawsBVC wrote:
In the case of donations by companies towards political groups/causes it can be argued that by donating, an employer is misrepresenting employee's views, and also that such donations can affect employee wage negotiations and even be thought of as a form harrassment/ill-treatment.
"Sorry Mr Gay, we can't afford a wage rise this year"
"Why not?"
"Because we donated heaps of money to those people that hate gays"
and it won't cost you a dime ... but you can't use it till after the 1st yearMAGUIRE93 wrote:
yeah I'm definitely going to get as much education in as i can.SEREMAKER wrote:
follow thisunnamednewbie13 wrote:
Congraturations. Invest your pay wisely. Don't assume the Army will cover for much. Keep up with education the best you can while you're in as well.
And try not to laugh if a drill sergeant looks comical.
you can easily get your associates while in, bachelors if you're committed ....... you just have to wait after the 1st year you're in
follow thisunnamednewbie13 wrote:
Congraturations. Invest your pay wisely. Don't assume the Army will cover for much. Keep up with education the best you can while you're in as well.
And try not to laugh if a drill sergeant looks comical.
hmmmmmTy wrote:
She's a lovely person, she just happens to have arms that can bend construction girders.
so we know for the record he's been shooting for 13 years ....... soooo he started when he was still in the cribunnamednewbie13 wrote:
It's...sort of a common sense thing. Long barrel, tight grouping. Short barrel, wide grouping. I don't see why there's an argument about it in this thread.-Sh1fty- wrote:
The point was that I'm qualified to own a weapon, as are you I'm sure. For the record I've been shooting guns for 13 years.
wrestlingjustice wrote:
What events will you guys be looking forward to in particular?
cool .... that would depend if uzi will be there ........ and how underground the games arejustice wrote:
My sister has a spare ticket for the final of the tennis, half tempted to go back just for that, once in life time thing etc..Lots of my friends in London are attending various events, it's a cool time to be in London for sure, I was planning on being there but got caught up in some shit at completely the wrong time.Jaekus wrote:
Anyone from BF3s actually attending any events?