oh you fucking retard, the point is that hardware requirements are bullshit
Search
Search results: 329 found, showing up to 50
opettele kirjottamaan pentu :_D
Idc, 1 out of 5Finray wrote:
You completely missed the point, and the description in the OP.RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:
Its called criticismFinray wrote:
Stop trolling.
"Fucking moron"
It's not meant to be edited, skillful, or interesting. It's meant to be straight up raw footage from how the gameplay is. Not a frag movie. How about you read sometime?
you suck at life mr stat padders
Every hardware configuraton is invidual, you cant just pick one and say "this will run perfectly on high settings" without first testing it on the actual game, Ive tried it few times and it claims you can run GTA4 smooth with 5yr old hardware.. When even the 1000e high end systems struggle with it on all maxJaekus wrote:
How can you say that? I tested it against my old PC, my new one through half the upgrade and then at completion. The settings were all accurate (barely play it, kinda play it, play it very well).RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:
Dont trust systemrequirementslab, its based on requirements set by the game designers who just give false hope so more people would buy their product, instead using data from real testsmooneyno1 wrote:
I heard that from the beta to the final game they made it run better, is this true?
Also:
http://i39.tin6691.png
whoop
I guess some people just believe everything they hear.
Deaths from revives isnt a mistake, they just had enough of those stat padding nubs in BF2 so they just decided to keep at least one form of padding away from the game.
Its called criticismFinray wrote:
Stop trolling.RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:
Got bored after about 3minutes, lacks editing and skill to make it interesting.
1 stars out of 5
"Fucking moron"
ITT:,
Mad M60 whores
Mad M60 whores
Hello 'nam?eleven bravo wrote:
mossberg 500
USAS-12 and youre fucking unstoppable for those 12 shells, click boom action at its best, it's my new 40mm GL <3
Dont trust systemrequirementslab, its based on requirements set by the game designers who just give false hope so more people would buy their product, instead using data from real testsmooneyno1 wrote:
I heard that from the beta to the final game they made it run better, is this true?prototype wrote:
buy the game as long as you meet the min requirements
its worth it and you get decent fps
Also:
http://i39.tin6691.png
whoop
Got bored after about 3minutes, lacks editing and skill to make it interesting.
1 stars out of 5
1 stars out of 5
All around good patch, died of GL like once in the 1h I was online, same with GC... Only complaints would be the tracer dart change and some lagging which is understandable.
Add huge run off zones (just like in BF2...) or just have ground-attack jets, like AC10s or Frogfoots if the size is an issue.
I hope they port some BF2 map into BC2, like wake (my fav ) or dalian plant....
Also on a more serious note
Why no jets? They were the best part of bf2 to me /
Also on a more serious note
Why no jets? They were the best part of bf2 to me /
So it seems it would be wise to move from XM8 to AN94... Oh well, Ill still rape
<2 minutes and im half way troughRod Foxx wrote:
Well 50 minutes in and i'm half way.mtb0minime wrote:
Shouldn't be that bad. I was d/l'ing around 100 (was d/l'ing other stuff during that) and it didn't take too long, ~30 min.
I want to meet the designer who though this was a good idea and tear his balls off.
I got plat like a week ago, and now I have like 550 kills with the GL
": D"
": D"
Depends on ur processor, really.. Radeon 5770 HD is the best value for money card atm, unless you can find a used 4890 HD, but both are useless if you have an old processor
And absolutely yes its worth getting 4GB ram.. 2GB is kinda little for todays games
And absolutely yes its worth getting 4GB ram.. 2GB is kinda little for todays games
youre not supposed to end up in the wrong end of the GL yanou? engage from distance etc etc
im fine with GLers, being ex one myself
im fine with GLers, being ex one myself
loosen up its a game lol.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
fuckin sick of these GL faggots im going to start using it exclusively to get back at all these retards pissing me off and post a rage montage of people talking shit to me.
ACOG's are for people who cant use ironsights, and who dont want x2 ammo.
Why arent people complaining about x4 scoped XM8 Project?
Its like M60 but more accurate with smaller mags
Its like M60 but more accurate with smaller mags
My 5770 (about same as 4870 1gb) + II 945+ @1280x1080 runs everything high at 60+ FPS on 32 player maps (both OC'd a bit) might need to tone down a bit for my new Full HD monitor though...
gheyTrotskygrad wrote:
drill people
I thought this was a BF forum, not the redneck gun nut club
PP2000 by far, great accuracy makes it good for med-long range and fast ROF ideal for CQB, heck, I even prefer it over assault rifles
Knifed some guy inside a container crate from the outside.. They rly need to change that stupid mechanic
40mm GL gets boring after 8th gold tbh
Werent u the 1 that complained about 40mm GL?seymorebutts443 wrote:
M2CG+more explosives+extra damage.
u fail, bolt actions (at least m95..) kill with one shot in closerange, and if youre with saiga or "any powerful weapon" you named, why would you want to switch to shittier gun in the middle of the shootingthepilot91 wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:
Yeah, auto pea shooter with the accuracy of a drunk blind manhaffeysucks wrote:
the m-93 isn't terrible. just click like a madman and it's pretty much auto
only way I get kills with it is to NOT try and use it , so to speak , I'm mostly a sniper so when the opposite team is a nubish one take the opportunety to go closerange "chest-shooting" sniper rifle/any other powerful weapon and finnish em of with the potatogun works for me
^lol, coming from american
Finray wrote:
A++++++ post, would read again.11 Bravo wrote:
oh
Finray wrote:
Could say the exact same thing to you.
why arent you banned yetseymorebutts443 wrote:
shut the fuck up.RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:
lol the irony
lol the irony
this forum is a battlefield
Id call outplayed, if you shoot him in the back and he kills you or if he kills you while you have high ground
luv u too hunsteelie34 wrote:
go do that noobRoaringJet[FIN] wrote:
i was wondering if it would be viable to put a sticker to the middle of ur screen and go nonscope people
You're amazing-Sh1fty- wrote:
I hate the GOL, there are no MIL dots so you can't judge the bullet drop properly.
M24 FTW.
Oh and I once got a sniper kill from the lighthouse in Valparaiso to the 2nd to last mcom line of defenses. The usual hill in the middle where everybody camps was a damn turkey shoot. As soon as somebody paused for more than 1 second they had a bullet through their skull. I got amazing marksmen scores, but as always, xfire is gay.
it was mehaffeysucks wrote:
ooooh who did you see do that? they must be so talented and dark and handsomeRoaringJet[FIN] wrote:
Not as awesome as 40mm GLing blackhawk from same distance
i was wondering if it would be viable to put a sticker to the middle of ur screen and go nonscope people :|
Not as awesome as 40mm GLing blackhawk from same distance
Only noobs who cant adapt *hate* in game weapons, oh look he killed me, must be because hes got better weapon than me, not because hes better or had situational advantage or anything.
lol defending m60
Quick view at your stats... And your most used weapon is M60
Move on.
Move on.
FYI I still have more assault rifle kills than 40mm GL kills so I wouldnt mindthepilot91 wrote:
what will be the difference from the present ...?RoaringJet[FIN] wrote:
Hmm.... So youre clearly frustrated about 40mm GL, so do youJohnG@lt wrote:
ITT, a Fin trying to justify his reliance on the noob tube followed by his dissertation on why he feels he is better than the rest of us because he's good with said noob tube.
1. Learn to play
2. Cry about 40mm GL on forums
I think Ill start using 40mm GL only and just camp behind a rock throwing nades because it seems to make people like you ragecry
Would love to hear your baby crying voice if EA suddenly removed the GL due to overpowerdness and suddenly you would have to learn to play the game your self , not just the tube.
Point out where I "argued past the point of the discussion", all you did was moan about RPG and that the dart doesnt work, where I replied that there is no recorded issue with RPG and tracer dart
What?Sisco10 wrote:
Don´t try so hard.
So why bring it up in the first place? DoucheI never said an RPG wouldn´t hurt or that I can´t hit things with it.
Theres nothing wrong with RPG and tracer darts, if anything the problem is between the chair and the monitorAnd the tracer dart problems seem to happen to a lot of people with the RPG.
I dont like you, what are you still doing here?What are you still doing here, nobody likes you.