I wish they had included bombs instead of those bloody guided missiles. Even on hardcore they seem to be pretty terrible - and useless if a tank has IR smoke.thepilot91 wrote:
IF just IF they do, you'd be better off bailing and dropping your 1 granade...but I'm pretty sure we wont see any bombs...FFLink wrote:
Jets might get unguided bombs?
Search
Search results: 295 found, showing up to 50
They actually made a table tennis game a few years back for the 360. From what I can remember, it scored highly with critics - then again, what Rockstar game doesn't._j5689_ wrote:
Tennis looks REALLY detailed to not be playable, either that or those are just very cleaned up pictures just to show off how people do things with their lives in the game now.....things that look really fucking detailed that you yourself can't do. Rockstar themselves don't make any tennis games afaik so there's no self-competition issue like there was with GTA IV and the Midnight Club franchise. Not a huge deal either way, but the more activities, the better
Game looks good though, I hope they balance the game play somewhere between GTA IV and GTA3/VC/SA. Personally, as much as I liked IV, it didn't have the same single player longevity as the previous titles. Great environmental detail, but lacking the freedom and variation in things to do that SA offered.
The screens look good. But as everyone else is saying, it means nothing until video footage or play tests are released.
Those artists are incredibly talented. Was expecting a little more from the bonus content though...FatherTed wrote:
bonus content announced, some pictures.
yay
!
http://blogs.battlefield.com/2012/08/au … um-events/
It is mate, just check out the PR forums, they are still busy.FatherTed wrote:
might reinstall everything and have a lookaerodynamic wrote:
probably is, i mean the alternative to pr is....ArmA? but arma is so broken and unoptimized.FatherTed wrote:
is PR still populated?
Bf3 pr would be nice to see.
COME ON DICE! WE WANT MODS.
I want forgotten hope 3.
Yeah, it was a good fun back in the day. It's taken them 5-6 years to get it up to where it is today, i can't imagine them abandoning the BF2 project for a BF3 one anytime soon.aerodynamic wrote:
I miss pr.UnkleRukus wrote:
I still dont understand wht you feel the need to censor your swears. Also, arma, red orchestra, pr, stalker.
We dont spray n pray ( unless intoxicated.) 90% of the fps players do.
Also i have no idea what shifty is on about.
Is this kid 13? or is this some weird internet shit that i'm not 'cool' enough to understand..:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
[22:06] ¦TØP¦ Patton: lol what
[22:06] . teH: this brigns me back to my point of
[22:06] . teH:
[00:30] . teH: see baddies r all LOL RUSH DA BOMB AND DIE
[00:30] . teH: while
[00:30] . teH: pros liek me r all >>> push, rape, rape, rape, push, rape, rape, push, rape, plant, camp, camp, camp, rape, +15 kills, repeat
[00:30] . teH: baddies r all >>> derp, derp, derp, herp, derp, derp, herp, derp, derp, derp, plant, die, repeat
[00:30] . teH: c the differance man HEHE XD
[22:07] . teH: baddies dunno hao to play thye just derp around and die amirite
[22:07] . teH: thinking teamwork winz games and shit (lol@careingasboutwinning@pubs)
[22:07] . teH: but all pros know
[22:07] . teH: it takes one guy to caryr a team
[22:07] . teH: HEHEHE
[22:07] . teH: I R #1 PUB TEAM CARIER IN DA WERLD
Agreed. Why play BF3 if you're only playing I/O. It's for people who want to rank up quick and fail at utilizing vehicles.UnkleRukus wrote:
Im srs about I/O being a shit game mode.
This man speaks the truth.m3thod wrote:
i think its lowered down to 32 once you unlock the maintenance perk.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Threshold is 50% IIRC. Extinguisher gets you to 53% so you start auto-repairing (gay).m3thod wrote:
the don't past a certain threshold, 32% for me.
In hardcore you don't regenerate health or vehicle repair.
I like those odds!PigPopTart wrote:
two grenades down left side to occupy the M320'ers. Smoke down the right side as your bookin' it and a shotgun to clear the resistance. Works 50% of the time.
I just avoid the stairs/confrontation at all costs. In fact, 90% of my Metro play time is spent re-enacting a train simulator in the driver compartments of the trains.
Same
Easier said than done. That tactic only really works when you're far away from the missile.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Why flares? Just turn around and face the missiles and barrel roll, you'll dodge them.
Flares are the best option for me, that is unless your flying against decent pilots who use only MG's, then it has to be the extinguisher.
Haha, they actually work on helis?aerodynamic wrote:
had a guy in a havoc who was hovering aroudn the last floor to clear out the snipers, i spawned with the usas frag rounds and went rambo on the cockpit.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
Oman+construction buildings+final recon sniper rifle+bipod+MEC jets
Once you get your sights lined up, it's non stop kills as they spawn in the cockpit.
Yes, i'm that much of a c*nt
was fun
Oman+construction buildings+final recon sniper rifle+bipod+MEC jets
Once you get your sights lined up, it's non stop kills as they spawn in the cockpit.
Yes, i'm that much of a c*nt
Once you get your sights lined up, it's non stop kills as they spawn in the cockpit.
Yes, i'm that much of a c*nt
No, i genuinely accept that i was wrong. I just wanted to dress my apology up a bit.Sisco wrote:
Turning to sarkasm when proven wrong, class act.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
I apologise beyond words for my mistakes. May the luck of the Irish shine down on youSisco wrote:
I think the english term for your misguided assumptions is correspondence bias. If you had read my post, you would have realised that it has nothing to do with skill, but is a mere technical issue.
Who is Henry01? Over 200 hours!?!
I apologise beyond words for my mistakes. May the luck of the Irish shine down on youSisco wrote:
I think the english term for your misguided assumptions is correspondence bias. If you had read my post, you would have realised that it has nothing to do with skill, but is a mere technical issue.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
Must be a PC problem. Never get it on 360-Sh1fty- wrote:
yup! It'll always (for me at least) show a spotted vehicle on the air radar, but it only detects non-spotted enemies randomly. There's also some weird expanding circle whenever I pass over what I'm assuming is infantry.
Yeah agreed. But the problem DICE has is people moaning about it all being imbalanced. It's a lose lose unfortunatelyMekstizzle wrote:
Dunno about consoles but Conquest Large on Karkand and Sharqi has it.
Too bad they made all the APC's/IFV's identical in terms of the main cannon, too much symmetry in this game for my liking. In BF2 the BTR had a fast fire rate but small splash, the LAV was an all-rounder and the Chinese APC was slow firing but a beast. Details like that are missing in BF3. The only real difference in vehicles I've seen (apart from model/texture) is with the F35 and the Havoc, which are vastly inferior to their counterparts. Maybe the SU-35 is a little less manoeuvrable than the F/A-18, but it's not that noticeable.
Must be a PC problem. Never get it on 360-Sh1fty- wrote:
yup! It'll always (for me at least) show a spotted vehicle on the air radar, but it only detects non-spotted enemies randomly. There's also some weird expanding circle whenever I pass over what I'm assuming is infantry.jord wrote:
Sisco flys sufficiently well. I've got 10 service stars with the jets and I agree with what's said, the air radar is seemingly random at the minute in terms of what it shows.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
He's moaning because the radar 'doesn't work properly' I'm saying it's not radar that's the problem, it's his flying skills. If he's getting zapped by jets creeping up on him, then obviously he needs to practise more. And in my experience, the radar ALWAYS shows you where the enemy aircraft are.
Wait, he bought it, took it back, bought it again, and now wants to take it back?jsnipy wrote:
he took it back once already
He's moaning because the radar 'doesn't work properly' I'm saying it's not radar that's the problem, it's his flying skills. If he's getting zapped by jets creeping up on him, then obviously he needs to practise more. And in my experience, the radar ALWAYS shows you where the enemy aircraft are.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Better at flying? The radar has nothing to do with the flying it's an automated system that sometimes shows you where enemy aircraft and ground vehicles are.
Well you look at it, you select it. I'd say it's being used. Either way, it doesn't need to be fixed, maybe you just need to get better at flying?Sisco wrote:
If you miss the point and talk about "using" a passive ability, then I´m sorry, but you´re fucking retarded.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
I'm sorry but if you cant work the air radar effectively then you're a fucking retard. It's genuinely simple to use, and probably the best bit of kit for the jet.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Yep it's messed up. Seems to only show you planes that are spotted or directly in front of you.
What should really be up for discussion is that F35, it's terrible at air to air. Brilliant against choppers and ground targets, but that counts for fuck all when you have migs flying overhead.
It turns like a bloody lorry!
I'm sorry but if you cant work the air radar effectively then you're a fucking retard. It's genuinely simple to use, and probably the best bit of kit for the jet.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Yep it's messed up. Seems to only show you planes that are spotted or directly in front of you.Sisco wrote:
They need to fix air radar for fucks sake. None is shown, then all of a sudden i catch a few bullets and BOP theres two jets circling me. The fuck.
What should really be up for discussion is that F35, it's terrible at air to air. Brilliant against choppers and ground targets, but that counts for fuck all when you have migs flying overhead.
It turns like a bloody lorry!
PC or 360?
Never happens on 360, although that's probably because they are unable to type.
On another note, how brilliant is the PDW?
On another note, how brilliant is the PDW?
Yeah me too. At first i thought he was taking the piss, then i saw his review of each game, now i'm starting to think he actually devised some sort complex rating system.Uzique wrote:
i hope you're being ironic with those decimal scores
Im probably 30k away... Never really use tanks. Really would like to try Citv though, looks like a pretty handy additionCanin wrote:
I am 10777 away from it.Camm wrote:
12k points to Citv!
I'm not 100% certain, but i think there is way you can change the game mode.Sisco wrote:
I SO FUCKEN HATE SQUAD DEATHMATCH
Who the hell thought that would be a good idea?!
Bf:v 8
Bf2 10
Bf2142 8
Bfbc 6
Bfbc2 7
Bf3 8.5
Bf2 10
Bf2142 8
Bfbc 6
Bfbc2 7
Bf3 8.5
Great shots. Bit too much editing and the music, well it's not for everyone put it that way
True that. I haven't seen any difference in the jets tbh. It's all about the rocket pods anyway, much more effective than the guided missiles.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Last round of Oman I went 20-1 in a jet.N00bkilla55404 wrote:
speaking of SOFLAM aircraft is now even more useless than ever.
Not all that useless tbh...
Aye, thank god you can no longer flatten buildings
I'd give you about 10-15 seconds before a rocket goes through the cockpit.M.O.A.B wrote:
I really want to hover the F35 in front of that building when people camp inside it, True Lies style.
Haha not bad. Used to like seeing stuff like that happen in BF2. I remember on Kubra seeing a jet pass through the tunnels for the first time - whilst i was running through one - and was like wtf?!
I really want to get this on PC so i can play with you lot. 24 players via 360 just isn't enough!
What about B2K? I saw a few comments you made about that (no prizes for guessing his opinion).
That's just it Uzique, this discussions history has been: "I can't wait for this game" "This game is going to be shit, Dice are shit". "The beta sucks dick, it doesn't work." "The game is shit, i hate flashlights." "This game is shit, the AA is too weak - Nerf the AA DICE, you're fucking terrible." "OMG the AA are way too powerful, fucking hell DICE you can't do shit." "B2k is coming, i can't wait" "B2k will be shit" "omg b2k is shit, there is too much glare, i can't even see the screen without wearing sunglasses."
Since when did the BF2s forums become a place for people to just moan. Constantly.
That's just it Uzique, this discussions history has been: "I can't wait for this game" "This game is going to be shit, Dice are shit". "The beta sucks dick, it doesn't work." "The game is shit, i hate flashlights." "This game is shit, the AA is too weak - Nerf the AA DICE, you're fucking terrible." "OMG the AA are way too powerful, fucking hell DICE you can't do shit." "B2k is coming, i can't wait" "B2k will be shit" "omg b2k is shit, there is too much glare, i can't even see the screen without wearing sunglasses."
Since when did the BF2s forums become a place for people to just moan. Constantly.
I'll give him the fact that he backs up his arguments. But even so, it gets old listening to him moan about every new release that comes out. Here's an idea Uzique, stop playing fucking video games.
And yeah, everyone is talking out of there arses in some respects (including Uzique), because despite all the bitching/whining, you're all still playing BF3/B2k. The fact that you even went out to buy B2K after practically condemning DICE and it's product to hell, shows how fickle you are.
And yeah, everyone is talking out of there arses in some respects (including Uzique), because despite all the bitching/whining, you're all still playing BF3/B2k. The fact that you even went out to buy B2K after practically condemning DICE and it's product to hell, shows how fickle you are.
Na, i think i'll just keep on playing.aerodynamic wrote:
Uhmm....no?DrunkFace wrote:
If it's such a no brainer. Then EA/DICE have managed to make a game which is not even as good as one made 6-7 years ago, and not just for its time, but also for being a direct competitor. With all it's bugs, imbalances, flaws, glitches, 7 year old graphics and the removal of the novelty factor as well. That's is quite and accomplishment, and not in a good way.
It also means everyone who agrees with you (and I suspect a vast majority of BF2 players would), have wasted their money to get something inferior to what they already owned or could have purchased for a fraction of the price. It's not dissimilar to owning a 2005 BMW and going, you know what I think I'll trade that in for a 2011 KIA cause you know they're really not 'that' bad.
But that's all in the past, Now what you should be doing, is stopping playing BF3, uninstalling it, and origin, closing down the servers reinstalling BF2, downloading your favourite mods, repopulating the few existing bf2 servers and hiring more as they fill and send EA/DICE a message that their current gaming direction is not where you feel it should be, but to look back to their roots of 2005 to the last decent game they produced, with the implicit arguement that any future games that are not up to scratch will not see one cent of your money.
If you keep accepting mediocrity and spending money on shit they that's all you will ever get in the future. If you keep claiming 'it doesn't suck that much' you will never ever get something that really doesn't suck. If companies like EA and Activision can put out cookie cutter shit every years and make millions of dollars profit what incentive have they got to make anything else?
I spent the money for bf3, i like it and i'm gonna keep playing it.
The main reason i might go back to bf2 is just to have some nice rounds on Pr, but thats about it.
Just because you don't like it doesn't mean others have to uninstall it and bitch about it everyday.
We fucking know all of you hate the game, bitching about it everyday in every single post won't change anything.
lol, it actually looked like he managed to get down when the building fell apart?
I'd rather have it that way than how it is on Metro.Sisco wrote:
Rush on the B2K maps is comically broken. Bigger space means much more paths to the objectives and as such breaks the game mode. You have to find a top notch pub team against a bunch of two-fingered, one-eyed leprechauns to have a chance of defending the objectives. Especially on Wake.
Playing rush, on another note, makes the lack of even basic teamwork even more clear. I don´t understand, has the playerbase changed that much? I mean, pub servers never where the hive of philanthropy, but in all the predecessors (even BC2) you had more people working together at least to a minimum degree, dropping health and ammo, repairing your tank, spotting targets, taking flags. The Recon spawn beacon is one of the most useful tools and yet I too often end up being the only one using it (even though I don´t really like the Recon class).
I'm not after you! Was just saying in general. I must have just directed it at you, for that, I apologise.mtb0minime wrote:
I've given my reasons for not liking the game, dunno why you're still after me.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
It's not really a discussion if all people do is just say: "This game is fucking shit, fucking DICE wasting my money, Fucking B2K pack, wish i never bought it, although i'm such a fucking retard i bought it anyway, despite slamming BF3".mtb0minime wrote:
I don't see what's so wrong about discussing BF3 in the BF3 thread.
It's not really a discussion if all people do is just say: "This game is fucking shit, fucking DICE wasting my money, Fucking B2K pack, wish i never bought it, although i'm such a fucking retard i bought it anyway, despite slamming BF3".mtb0minime wrote:
I don't see what's so wrong about discussing BF3 in the BF3 thread.
RTHKI wrote:
it takes zero effort to write how much i fucking hate a game
i fucking hate bf2
Not at all, i understand people not liking the game if it's not to their tastes. But for people to say it's 'shit' and 'fucking awful' is a massive exaggeration. People get too carried away on subjects like this, it's incredibly sad.mtb0minime wrote:
Same can be said about saying a game is good.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
I just think people get carried away on forums, especially as it takes zero effort to write how much you 'fucking hate' a game without applying little thought or reason.
You seem to be discounting other people's opinions because it doesn't match yours.
Okay, lets face it, no one has huge expectations of Dice. We always moaned at every new patch and every nerf that came with it. But i'm sure secretly you were hoping for something amazing.mtb0minime wrote:
The sad part is that I didn't have huge expectations and it still let me down.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
Because i see how easily you, among others, pick faults with the game. You'd be pissed if you forked out £40 for a game with updated graphics.mtb0minime wrote:
How do you know what I would and wouldn't have done? That's not really a valid rebuttal.
I played BF2 up until the beta for BF3. I enjoyed the hell out of it. I would have been satisfied if they used the same formula + updated graphics.
Don't get me wrong mtb0minime, i'm not saying BF3 is an amazing game. Nor am I saying that I like it anywhere near as much as I liked BF2. But, i will say that it isn't a bad game. Like any game, it has its faults. Unfortunately, BF2 players (as sad as it is, myself included) had huge expectations fr this game, only to realise that the series has moved on.
All i'm saying is, whilst BF3 isn't the great, groundbreaking game BF2 once was, it's still a good game. I just think people get carried away on forums, especially as it takes zero effort to write how much you 'fucking hate' a game without applying little thought or reason.
Because i see how easily you, among others, pick faults with the game. You'd be pissed if you forked out £40 for a game with updated graphics.mtb0minime wrote:
How do you know what I would and wouldn't have done? That's not really a valid rebuttal.
I played BF2 up until the beta for BF3. I enjoyed the hell out of it. I would have been satisfied if they used the same formula + updated graphics.
Don't get me wrong mtb0minime, i'm not saying BF3 is an amazing game. Nor am I saying that I like it anywhere near as much as I liked BF2. But, i will say that it isn't a bad game. Like any game, it has its faults. Unfortunately, BF2 players (as sad as it is, myself included) had huge expectations fr this game, only to realise that the series has moved on.
Im sorry, but i sincerely doubt that. 'I would've been completely happy if it were BF2 + updated graphics.' Bullshit, you'd have been moaning like hell.mtb0minime wrote:
Just because people put a lot of hard work into something doesn't mean we should go easy on them and doesn't mean it's automatically not a piece of shit.
I'm disappointed because I would've been completely happy if it were BF2 + updated graphics. That's all they had to do. But they went a completely different direction, which is fine if that's their goal and that's what they want to do. They sure have picked up a lot of new fans with this one. However, they've also lost a lot of fans.
People moaned constantly about BF2, the only reason half the users have all these 'fond' memories of it, is simply nostalgia. Trust me, i've been here for 6 years and i remember every motherfucker moaning at some point.