Or both!Tetrino wrote:
Either flooded or frozen.
Search
Search results: 1,498 found, showing up to 50
r u 4 sexes chat?1927 wrote:
On 2nd thoughts it's eitherOllie wrote:
Np bbz xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxooxx1927 wrote:
or ,or
KFC Jelly - Chicken Flavoured.
Note has been noted on the Grammer ty.
Chicken and Chips
or
Fish and Chips
but never
Chicken and Fish.
I would have no concerns with being called "bbz" on any thread followed by loads of oxo kisses but in a thread regarding KY jelly I am nervous.
Np bbz xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxooxx1927 wrote:
or ,orOllie wrote:
you're**1927 wrote:
Shudda called it OK jelly.
"Ok - your good to go".
KFC Jelly - Chicken Flavoured.
Note has been noted on the Grammer ty.
you're**1927 wrote:
Shudda called it OK jelly.
"Ok - your good to go".
FIX 4 UKurazoo wrote:
I'm gayOllie wrote:
I wondered if you could reccomend me a movie making program. Windows Movie Maker is totally fucked for me, dosn't work at all.
Thanks in advance.
Fight the power, maaaan.
If you want a scientific answer, very little is known about how "psychedelic" chemicals effect the brain. However, it is known that these chemicals become a temporary replacement/supplement to mono-amine neurotransmitters like serotonin. For example the penephylamine alkaloid mescaline binds to the same brain receptors as serotonin does and does a better job of transmitting signals than serotonin. In short this creates quicker and clearer thinking, moments of epiphany. It's true that these chemicals make your thought patterns irregular (because the way the thoughts are manifested are wholly irregular) but they don't hinder your thoughts in any way, quite the contrary.nukchebi0 wrote:
As for the illegality, I don't see how doing drugs make you think more freely. Since you obviously have more experience with them than me, could you possibly explain how they help you transcend the confines of government-shaped thinking?
On a personal level I can say that thinking while under the influence of a psychedelic is like being in a state of deep meditation (only a thousand times more intense). Thoughts come quickly and dissipate slowly, you can recall previous events in clearer detail and see new meaning in them, it's a truly magical experience that really can't be justified in words. The experience transcends that. Human speech is an altogether too Private mode of communication to express the experience.
You're probably right here. I think it's kind of impractical to abstain from something in the hope of an event that might not transpire for years to come.nukchebi0 wrote:
To be honest, I am all for legalizing marijuana, as I see the benefits to having it legalized. Less crowded jails and sorely needed tax dollars are good. However, I think it is a more mature and ultimately more successful way to effect change by following the rules and arguing in favor of their repeal, instead of just brazenly breaking them.
Well, Lysergic acid diethylamide (member of the lysergic amide family is semi-synthetic. It's extracted from ergot, a fungus that grows in rye.nukchebi0 wrote:
Finally, last time I checked, LSD is synthetic.
A lot of psychedelics are wholly natural though (they can be consumed in their natural form for their effects), psilocybin, psilocin, mescaline, ibogaine, dimethyltryptamine...
An interesting fact is that dimethyltryptamine (DMT) actually occurs naturally in the human brain and analogous serotonin. It's also a class A/Schedule 1 drug. So technically we are all guilty of possession.
Computers is a striking example of a wartime innovation. Undoubtedly they have improved the lives of billions. However, computers would have been invented sooner or later it just seems that war is a catalyst.nukchebi0 wrote:
I'm thinking not much more than goes during wartime. Instead of using research to find more effective way to kill something, the research would just go towards enhancing our lives with more entertainment devices, better transportation, and the like. Coincidentally, or not, much of this can be and has derived from wartime innovations now. I'll pull examples if you want, but I'm certain you can think of some yourself.Home wrote:
No, but I do expect that a drastically smaller amount of money would be dedicated to killing people. Think how much money just a single bomb costs. We would be saving massive amounts of money, which would be focused elsewhere, and probably a good portion of it would go to elongating human lives.nukchebi0 wrote:
Are you expecting that 100% of research during peacetime would be dedicated to elongating human lives?
Rocket technology for example, Nazi Germany came up with the first rockets that went into outer space (V2), and centurys before them the Chinese made gunpowder rockets to fire explosive charges at the enemy.
I think it's mighty uninformed to say "nothing good ever came from war" but we could certainly do without it.
So it's acctually okay for Ken Kesey to write his book under the influence of LSD? Because I don't see Cuckoo's Nest as being stupid or immature in any way.nukchebi0 wrote:
I hate coffee, actually. But since I know you are referring to the caffeine contained within, I have had large amount of sodas containing caffeine. To be honest, they don't affect me greatly. Getting excessively tired is about the only way I can alter my state of perception, and in that case, I can say I think much less coherently than I do energized. I only dislike altered states of perception if they were obtained illegally, or if they result in pathetically stupid or immature actions.Ollie wrote:
Or Mein Kampf.VicktorVauhn wrote:
OK I'll bite....Whats wrong with a lack of coherence?
As long as its a good story, and written well...I can follow some skips. I don't mind if parts don't obviously fit into reality or dreams...
I hope for your sake you never read Johnny Got His Gun.
However, you're right. As long as the book is elegible and you gain knowledge from it then I don't see the problem. I don't find Cuckoo's Nest at all hard to read anyway.
nukchebi0 seems to have a stigma when it comes to having an altered state of perception, though I am sure he has drunk coffee more than once.
As for altered states that are aquired illigally. Why do you think these natural chemicals are illigal anyway? They help you to think outside the confines of the tiny box that the government wants you thinking inside of. You know, the one which keeps you just smart enough to operate the machines but just dumb enough so that you don't care when your rights and freedom is taken away.
There are plenty of legal plants that the government has yet to prohibit, are they morally acceptable to use to gain altered states of perception or not?
I'm not trying to score points here I'm genuinely interested in your point of view.
Naturally.nukchebi0 wrote:
And, as I said, literary quality is highly subjective.
Anyone who see's through the lies and sensationalism that are potentiated by the media is worthy of my attention.
But no, not Tom Cruise. He's just another wounded idiot scooped up by money grabbing freaks.
But no, not Tom Cruise. He's just another wounded idiot scooped up by money grabbing freaks.
Or Mein Kampf.VicktorVauhn wrote:
OK I'll bite....Whats wrong with a lack of coherence?nukchebi0 wrote:
How is this ignorant? I think incoherent literature sucks, because it doesn't flow and jumps around. Ken Kesey, who wrote much of Cuckoo's Nest while high, has shown that writing high removes coherence.Ollie wrote:
Your ignorance shows through again.
As long as its a good story, and written well...I can follow some skips. I don't mind if parts don't obviously fit into reality or dreams...
I hope for your sake you never read Johnny Got His Gun.
However, you're right. As long as the book is elegible and you gain knowledge from it then I don't see the problem. I don't find Cuckoo's Nest at all hard to read anyway.
nukchebi0 seems to have a stigma when it comes to having an altered state of perception, though I am sure he has drunk coffee more than once.
The only celebrities I follow (and even then loosely) are the intelligent, outspoken, free thinkers. Of which there are few.
If they were, I may have to go to their next rally with an AK-47 and shut them up.Poseidon wrote:
Very true! Very true indeed.Ollie wrote:
At least they aren't wearing Guy Fawkes masks...Poseidon wrote:
Bloody fucking hell.
http://www.nydailynews.com/img/2008/04/ … dium-1.jpg
God damn WBC.
If they were, I may have to take down that V for Vendetta poster I have on my wall...
I never said Animal Farm wasn't entirely his creation. I said, I don't care for allegory.nukchebi0 wrote:
But at the same time, Animal Farm is not? If you go by these standards, Animal Farm is entirely his creation as well. Your posts seem to suggest you believe the contrary.Ollie wrote:
So some mystical force wrote part of the book for him? Of course the book is entirely his creation you dim-wit. (is this really necessary?)nukchebi0 wrote:
The "creation" of 1984 is Orwell's vivid picture of the functioning of a totalitarian state, which borrows from reality. I have trouble calling that entirely his own creation.
Edit: Evidentially, whether a book is entirely an author's creation is a subjective analysis. Do you two consider the story to be the primary aspect of a story in terms of creation?
Nevertheless, 1984 is entirely Orwell's creation whether he took inspiration from the world around him or not.
If we are to follow with your line of thought then no book ever written is truely it's authors creation because all books contain elements which are not of the authors invention.
People see celebrities as something they can aspire to be. The greatest honour in this backwards society is to become well known and have lots of money. People are idiots, they don't want to think, they want to be entertained. They lap it all up while their rights are taken away from right under their fucking noses.
The lens-flare in the first pic kinda ruins it but the rest are great.
So some mystical force wrote part of the book for him? Of course the book is entirely his creation you dim-wit.nukchebi0 wrote:
The "creation" of 1984 is Orwell's vivid picture of the functioning of a totalitarian state, which borrows from reality. I have trouble calling that entirely his own creation.Ollie wrote:
I'm not disputing that he took inspiration from the events of his time. I have trouble with the idea that taking inspiration from something means that what you create isn't truely your creation. Makes no sense at all.nukchebi0 wrote:
Oh, but he did. Think about it for a second.
At least they aren't wearing Guy Fawkes masks...Poseidon wrote:
Bloody fucking hell.
http://www.nydailynews.com/img/2008/04/ … dium-1.jpg
God damn WBC.
The ignorant bit is the fact that you have no experience of psychedelic drugs and the effect they have on your brain.nukchebi0 wrote:
How is this ignorant? I think incoherent literature sucks, because it doesn't flow and jumps around. Ken Kesey, who wrote much of Cuckoo's Nest while high, has shown that writing high removes coherence.Ollie wrote:
Your ignorance shows through again.nukchebi0 wrote:
Are you kidding me?
While writing music while high has undisputedly good results, literature requires coherence denied to a person with an altered state of mind.
I'm not disputing that he took inspiration from the events of his time. I have trouble with the idea that taking inspiration from something means that what you create isn't truely your creation. Makes no sense at all.nukchebi0 wrote:
Oh, but he did. Think about it for a second.Oh Lord. What a silly comment.nukchebi0 wrote:
As I said, I thought it was written better.
1984 isn't entirely of Orwell's own creation, though, since he obviously took inspiration from the totalitarian governments of the time he wrote it in.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_KeseyVicktorVauhn wrote:
TBH I would rather rate literature on weather or not its good, rather then what the artist had done.nukchebi0 wrote:
Are you kidding me?VicktorVauhn wrote:
The only book I have ever read with out it feeling like a chore was One flew over the coo coos nest.
While writing music while high has undisputedly good results, literature requires coherence denied to a person with an altered state of mind.
And no, one thing I learned in all my semesters of JC English class is writes usually have fucked up lives and drink themselfs into the grave.
I actually didn't really know anything about Ken Kesey, we read the book in school and while his substance abuse was mentioned we didn't really hear details.
I saw a program way later on the rise of LSD, and about Ken Kesey...and heard he wrote that book after working in a metal institution so he could steal drugs...shit definitely makes sense
I hated english class so I'm not the one to rate books for you, I'm just saying it was the only one I've ever sat down and read large chunks of with out feeling like I was making myself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merry_Pranksters
I'm a hippy. (No, I'm not but thats how you guys would view me)
Personally, I think a bullet through the brain is the only thing someone who thinks war is good deserves.
We need to rid the world of these digenerate pigs and start over.
Here's Bill Hicks the guide you through the theory:
Personally, I think a bullet through the brain is the only thing someone who thinks war is good deserves.
We need to rid the world of these digenerate pigs and start over.
Here's Bill Hicks the guide you through the theory:
Your ignorance shows through again.nukchebi0 wrote:
Are you kidding me?VicktorVauhn wrote:
The only book I have ever read with out it feeling like a chore was One flew over the coo coos nest.
While writing music while high has undisputedly good results, literature requires coherence denied to a person with an altered state of mind.
Well said.Home wrote:
Eh... I disagree. I liked Animal Farm a lot too, but it seemed like there was less substance. Animal Farm was just an (excellent) allegory to the Russian revolution. 1984 was entirely of Orwell's own creation, he wasn't just copying and slightly changing real life events.nukchebi0 wrote:
Animal Farm was better than 1984, by a very small amount.
Oh Lord. What a silly comment.nukchebi0 wrote:
As I said, I thought it was written better.
1984 isn't entirely of Orwell's own creation, though, since he obviously took inspiration from the totalitarian governments of the time he wrote it in.
Really? I found 1984 much greater food for thought. I don't really care for allegory.nukchebi0 wrote:
Animal Farm was better than 1984, by a very small amount.
/threadS.Lythberg wrote:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … neris.jpeg
That's a bit presumptuous.nukchebi0 wrote:
No one cares about geography.
/threadMutantsteak wrote:
http://nerd-paradise.com/images/nerd/nerd_385x261.jpg
Hmm, I'm just looking for something quick and easy to use really. Thanks for the input though.
David hopes he gets a murder trial so he can condemn the fucker to life/death.
You mean they acctually teach the geography of other countries in America?nukchebi0 wrote:
If google=my memory, then yes, I do too.Ollie wrote:
Yeah, I love google too.nukchebi0 wrote:
Not really.
Riga is Latvia capital.
Tallinn is Estonia's capital.
Vilnius is Lithuania's capital.
Thanks mate, I'll check it out.
Oh, I intend to.Mutantsteak wrote:
Get it by any means necessary
God bless America.
Yeah, I love google too.nukchebi0 wrote:
Not really.Mutantsteak wrote:
liesnukchebi0 wrote:
I knew it without cheating.
Riga is Latvia capital.
Tallinn is Estonia's capital.
Vilnius is Lithuania's capital.
I wondered if you could reccomend me a movie making program. Windows Movie Maker is totally fucked for me, dosn't work at all.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
No, I'm yet to achieve ego death or be abducted by aliens.
Good one chief.Lynx14 wrote:
You can't murder yourself. You can kill yourself but you can't murder yourself. GJ!!!!!DoctaStrangelove wrote:
FIX 4 UMutantsteak wrote:
It's a sign Armageddon is coming. I sure hope so. It's gonna be one hell of a trip.
You guys
Well, I guess suicide is your only option.Lynx14 wrote:
I was just outside with my dog .Ollie wrote:
Lynx, stop being a cunt. Go outside for a walk, cool down. Take it easy.
Stop eating grass then.Mutantsteak wrote:
Yeah, I don't feel well
Lynx, stop being a cunt. Go outside for a walk, cool down. Take it easy.
Room?
Once every 4-5 months
Keyboard?
Erm, I've done it once in about 5 years(I've had a few different keyboards in that time too, so this one I'm using right now has never been cleaned).
Computer?
Never
Self?
Everyday
Hands?
After I do toilet time
Teeth?
Once/twice a day
Once every 4-5 months
Keyboard?
Erm, I've done it once in about 5 years(I've had a few different keyboards in that time too, so this one I'm using right now has never been cleaned).
Computer?
Never
Self?
Everyday
Hands?
After I do toilet time
Teeth?
Once/twice a day
It's nothing to do with freedom, you're a fool if you think the American people are free. It's about the elite protecting their financial interests. Simple as that.
Well, I believe whole-heartedly in personal freedom so if a person wants to kill themselves to avoid physical or psychological pain then they should be allowed to.
Who gives a fuck?
You obviously don't live in Halifax.HurricaИe wrote:
this isn't something you see every day
I would have ripped his hand off and slapped him silly with it.
I don't mean to come across as cold and heartless but that's just the way I am.
I don't mean to come across as cold and heartless but that's just the way I am.
It's already 4/20 here. Had a few joints to say the least.
Bulldogz wrote:
Absolutely nothing.Ollie wrote:
What is it good for?NeXuS4909 wrote:
War?!?!