lame
Search
Search results: 368 found, showing up to 50
thats BSjsnipy wrote:
I'd just get the full version. it will save you some headaches.prototype wrote:
ok I got a question:
I own windows 98 SE, would it make any difference if I installed that and then bought the windows xp upgrade instead of the full version so I could save a $100 ?
Or is it better or more stable to go ahead and buy the full version?
thank you
Buy the upgrade - the only difference is you have to show it the old windows CD during the installation
TMH clan = Noobs
They have a rule against bunny hopping which is sensible, yet they dont enforce it on their own clan members
Point out the obvious = Ban
Pathetic - should have known better when its a IO Karkand Server
They have a rule against bunny hopping which is sensible, yet they dont enforce it on their own clan members
Point out the obvious = Ban
Pathetic - should have known better when its a IO Karkand Server
T1g3r217 wrote:
I got compensated.
fairplay mate, each to their ownjames@alienware wrote:
Both of you....CommieChipmunk wrote:
that's trueMong0ose wrote:
that has to be one of the tackiest looking cases i have EVER had the misfortune to see
I know 'tackiness' isn't solely denoted on looks... so I thought you should know that the build quality is amazing, the metal and the way it is put together gives it a feel of class and 'expensiveness'.
that has to be one of the tackiest looking cases i have EVER had the misfortune to see
Anyone know when this is being released? i heard 27th july but that has come and gone
surely thats a statement not a questionmajorassult wrote:
well aren't you special?Mong0ose wrote:
i hit 9/10 including infantry on foot - g5 ftwShadowFoX wrote:
If you can hit 2 out of 3 TV missiles xfire me we'll get something going.
i hit 9/10 including infantry on foot - g5 ftwShadowFoX wrote:
If you can hit 2 out of 3 TV missiles xfire me we'll get something going.
nice, whats the 1st song?
my god ur an idiotcyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
They're both inbred fucks.
most fun map imo
bf2 is 3 yrs old so probably true
bf2142 is shit so who cares
bf2142 is shit so who cares
better than that clearlyThe_Guardsman wrote:
Tried to sign up for this and it said my computers hardware was to shit! AMD 3200 64 processor, 2 gigs of RAM and a RADEON ATI 9600 AGP card (granted thats shit)( but what the hell are they after?
wow, someones country obviously got owned, hard
dod and dod:s
just leave the game as it is, its fine
unlikely as its the flagship product atmJaMrulezass wrote:
What if ATI never fixes the drivers and the card never lives up to its specs? Could this happen?RDMC wrote:
Why not? People did it as well with the 8800 series. They bought the cards whilst the drivers were still shit.
45 using the M24 on wake, some lucky pistol shots kept the streak goin
they r both terrible
it's a mouse, who cares what it looks like
my G5 looks like some1 has wiped their ass on it, still a good mouse though
my G5 looks like some1 has wiped their ass on it, still a good mouse though
that is messed up, hope you never have a kid with a disability
yes
if its so bad why continue to use it? struggling to see the point of this, which ironically relates to what u are moaning about
gay threads like this without doubt - GET OVER YOURSELF
reset
without doubt, i'd go back to when i first started goin out with the fittest girl i ever pulled and put more effort into making it work
only watched the first 45secs - what a waste of my time
nope - just this minute been banned!Samtheman53.000001 wrote:
lolMong0ose wrote:
i've been banned for accusing the admin of dolphin diving, even though i have the fraps vid to prove it
It was on the DOM server if anyone is interested - bunch of nublets
your playing there now
it's spelt 'Design' not 'Dizign'
/sarcasm
/sarcasm
i've been banned for accusing the admin of dolphin diving, even though i have the fraps vid to prove it
It was on the DOM server if anyone is interested - bunch of nublets
It was on the DOM server if anyone is interested - bunch of nublets
anyone played on DOM 24/7 IO Karkand - just went on their serve to own some noobs, got my expert sniper 10mins into the round then got banned, great!
Edit: Any DOM noobs on this forum? if so, learn how to play the game ffs
Edit: Any DOM noobs on this forum? if so, learn how to play the game ffs
cheers for the advice guys
Zenmaster - i did mean the fps in BF2 not the fps that fraps is displaying in the corner
I have however just changed the settings to half size and 30 fps recording to my 2nd HD and it is working MUCH better
Zenmaster - i did mean the fps in BF2 not the fps that fraps is displaying in the corner
I have however just changed the settings to half size and 30 fps recording to my 2nd HD and it is working MUCH better
full size
Just wondering if anyone else gets BAD slowdown in game when they use fraps?
I have a decent enough pc, plays bf2 maxed out and i get 100+ fps constantly, however when u turn fraps on this drops to 25-30fps and is unplayable! i only have the demo version of fraps that lets u record for 30 seconds, and i have it set to record at 25fps
My specs are:
E6600 @ 2.4Ghz
BFG 7950 GT OC 256
2GB DDR2 800MHz
Asus P5W DH Deluxe
Turned off dynamic shadows and lighting or whatever it is but it has no effect
Any ideas on how i can stop fraps from laggin my gameplay? Want to avoid OC'ing
Cheers
I have a decent enough pc, plays bf2 maxed out and i get 100+ fps constantly, however when u turn fraps on this drops to 25-30fps and is unplayable! i only have the demo version of fraps that lets u record for 30 seconds, and i have it set to record at 25fps
My specs are:
E6600 @ 2.4Ghz
BFG 7950 GT OC 256
2GB DDR2 800MHz
Asus P5W DH Deluxe
Turned off dynamic shadows and lighting or whatever it is but it has no effect
Any ideas on how i can stop fraps from laggin my gameplay? Want to avoid OC'ing
Cheers
the M3 is the only decent car on the list
the fact that u care about ur stats that much actually scares me
nope, quad core is the future, but if u want a decent rig now just for games, go with the E6850White-Fusion wrote:
Changed your mind?Mong0ose wrote:
E6850!
E6850!
all the iron bru lovers are from the north! oh the irony!krazed wrote:
Noobeater wrote:
Iron bru FTW, its made of girders and is the chuck norris of the soft drink world.i hate you both, so very muchI'm Jamesey wrote:
Irn bru
i cant get that around here anymore bastards
mature response, well done therebuLLet_t00th wrote:
Its becasue of you and your fucking lame knowledge.Mong0ose wrote:
lmaobuLLet_t00th wrote:
I think this thread shows why Leet came up with the idea of 'Tech people'.
Does it make you sad that somebody knows something that you don't? Are you going to go cry to your mummy?
Kids on the internet!Its easy to OC. You can get an easy high OC on the E6850, but harder to do it on the Quad without decent cooling.joker8baller wrote:
How hard to overclock?
i've just read one review online so my knowledge is now on a par with bullet tooth
E6850 is the better option for gaming
lmaobuLLet_t00th wrote:
I think this thread shows why Leet came up with the idea of 'Tech people'.
400hrs over 2yrs is hardly a lotbuLLet_t00th wrote:
Arrogant? I'm just stating the facts!Mong0ose wrote:
thats because, unlike you, i am happy to admit i dont know much about itbuLLet_t00th wrote:
Thats a great argument you've got there.
I see you haven't actually explained why you would reccommend one CPU over another....I wonder why?
unfortunatly, unlike u again, i have a life and dont spend my hours searching the net for the latest geek reprt to read
and finaly, unlike you, i am not that arrogant
But you're happy playing hours and hours of BF2?
Thats fine if you dont know much about stuff like this, but posting in a thread where someone is about to spend a lot of money on something, and reccommending something isn't very helpful.
however, i do take your point about recommending something to someone when i dont know what im talking about, maybe u shld take ur own advice
like i said, quad core is the future, never said he should get it nowcyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Why get it now when in half a years time you can get it faster and cheaper?Mong0ose wrote:
yup, quad core is the futureTheEternalPessimist wrote:
He'll be on £5.35, thats national minimum.
e6850 BTW, I'd be going quad core though.
depends what he planning on using his pc for at the end of the day
thats because, unlike you, i am happy to admit i dont know much about itbuLLet_t00th wrote:
Thats a great argument you've got there.
I see you haven't actually explained why you would reccommend one CPU over another....I wonder why?
unfortunatly, unlike u again, i have a life and dont spend my hours searching the net for the latest geek reprt to read
and finaly, unlike you, i am not that arrogant
joking aside, some people are seriously up their own ass on herebuLLet_t00th wrote:
I just don't see the point for people who just play games on their PC.JaMrulezass wrote:
Bullet Tooth just hates the Quads rite nowYou're really showing that you don't know what you're talking about now....I suggest you don't embarrass yourself further.mafropetee wrote:
in real-time, actual experience, the Q6600 will give you more satisfaction with A: its ability to multitask like crazy and B: the future of multithreaded aplications.buLLet_t00th wrote:
But the E6600 is not hitting max at 3.4, if both had the best coolers and the best components to go alongside it, the E6600 would still beat it hands down. Thats at clock speed, not in multitask performance.
point made. thank you.
Multi-tasking only plays a part when you have got tonnes and tonnes of complex programmes running. The C2D's have shown that they can handle immense amounts of information being proccessed through it, I doubt you'd have enough programmes running to stop dead the E6850. So this part of your argument fails.
Next we have the multi-thread argument. Yes four is better than two, but how many games now and in the future are going to have four cores as something you must have to run a game? Whats that you're saying.....none? One core of each of the CPU's will be used much more than that of the others available (and this is putting it as simply as it can get) and obviously the one with the higher clock speed is better!
This all comes down to whether the OP wants to use video render software, Photoshop software etc. etc.
Now please be quiet.
i didnt realise you were privy to all the game developers future plans
oh right........of course......you're not
haha, fairplayWhite-Fusion wrote:
Its 6.50 an hour, but most of the extra money is over time, which is heavily taxed.Mong0ose wrote:
By my maths, thats £5/hr, not great, and also in breach of the EU working time directiveWhite-Fusion wrote:
I work 12 hours a day. £300 a week. Its not a paper round idiot.
Im buying it all in 1 week. I allready have 50% of it. Im asking for the opinion of people as they are both the same price.
Jesus you bloody idiot.
And why are you slagging of jesus, he has nothing to do with this, and doubt he knows much about CPU's anyway
Yep its in breach of the limit of working hours... BT fail at checking.
we've all got to make money somehow, BT's problem not yours
yup, quad core is the futureTheEternalPessimist wrote:
He'll be on £5.35, thats national minimum.
e6850 BTW, I'd be going quad core though.
we have a winnermafropetee wrote:
once again, my normal challenge: take two E6600's in two computers of the exact same specs, clock one at 3.0GHz and one at 3.4GHz, and tell me if you can honestly see a difference (besides in CPU-Z where it says "3400MHz"). no. i highly doubt you could.buLLet_t00th wrote:
But the E6600 is not hitting max at 3.4, if both had the best coolers and the best components to go alongside it, the E6600 would still beat it hands down. Thats at clock speed, not in multitask performance.gvers wrote:
I think he means that 3Ghz is not really overclocking to the max 3.4-3.8 would be more like it. The 2 processors both have advantages over each other and I would expect the e6850 to overclock better that the Q6600 for most people because of the extra heat of the quad core.
in real-time, actual experience, the Q6600 will give you more satisfaction with A: its ability to multitask like crazy and B: the future of multithreaded aplications.
point made. thank you.
By my maths, thats £5/hr, not great, and also in breach of the EU working time directiveWhite-Fusion wrote:
I work 12 hours a day. £300 a week. Its not a paper round idiot.Mong0ose wrote:
why ask then if u dont like quad coresWhite-Fusion wrote:
Care to explain why? Quad core - big no no.
ffs im sick of these gay threads. i bet that 99% of the time people posting this shit either have no intetion of buyin the kit and just want to 'look' cool, or they would have to save their paperound money for the next 20 years to afford it
do what everyone else does and read some reviews, then, hard as it might seem, make your own damn mind up
Im buying it all in 1 week. I allready have 50% of it. Im asking for the opinion of people as they are both the same price.
Jesus you bloody idiot.
And why are you slagging of jesus, he has nothing to do with this, and doubt he knows much about CPU's anyway