online poker tax cheating
online poker tax evasion
online poker tax evasion
No I accidentally spit on her when it was time to rinse. My mouth was numbed.The Sheriff wrote:
Did you fuck her up the butt
No, you've been reported for racism.Shahter wrote:
darn...Marlo Stanfield wrote:
You would have if you didn't live in Russia.Shahter wrote:
have i just "won"?
ah, i know. i lied to you all, i live in usa actually, i'm a nigga, unemployed, a crack addict, and i'm suckin teh lifeblood out of this land of opportunity. oh, almost forgot:
lowing is an ignorant prick.
see? the above is just about as on-topic as most of lowing's rants. so, are we all set now? have i won?
Why not?Ilocano wrote:
Not gonna happen in most of mainland China.ghettoperson wrote:
Bang a Chinese girl.
Marlo Stanfield wrote:
It would be awesome if we could create some Griffins and release them in Africa or South America.
In that case you would more than likely catch Herpes from her.Morpheus wrote:
Not if they like sex and hate kids.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
Girls sometimes 'forget' to take their birth control.
Wanna train some Mexicans to play online poker now?Bevo wrote:
i actually read all of thatphishsux wrote:
if anyone wants to read about poker and taxes in the us
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/57/po … es-740589/
warning...tldr
You would have if you didn't live in Russia.Shahter wrote:
have i just "won"?
I was going by his 30-35% tax rate and assumed he looked up the U.S. tax rates.Mekstizzle wrote:
ig is minting that much, really?Marlo Stanfield wrote:
The fact that you made 171-373 Grand just playing online poker
2010 Tax bracketsphishsux wrote:
well i mean they can see your bank accounts and stuff and know that youre making money somehow. i really just want to move to europe or costa rica or somewhere where i dont have to worry about paying taxes on my winnings. i have a lot to figure out this year with my life, and im just going to continue to play it by earghettoperson wrote:
Ohhhh right that makes more sense. I always wondered how you though you'd get away with it. Basically unless you make enough to make the news, they have no idea if you're making anything at all?phishsux wrote:
its not like the irs knows how much i have. if online poker was actually regulated here, it would be much easier for them to tax people like me, but as we all know, our govt aint too bright
They may be able to subpoena your Paypal, or bank records. Either way if they found out you ran from a huge tax burden you'll get arrested at the airport if you try to get back in ever.phishsux wrote:
its not like the irs knows how much i have. if online poker was actually regulated here, it would be much easier for them to tax people like me, but as we all know, our govt aint too brightMarlo Stanfield wrote:
If you run without paying, you know you'll never be able to return right?
As awesome as that would be to watch it would never happen since some people beleive in sanctity of life or something like that.CameronPoe wrote:
We could have televised battles between viewer designed mutants... /winSEREMAKER wrote:
"These could be used in the future to make the most powerful bioweapons imaginable. The challenge is to eat the fruit without the worm."
well, thats nice to know
CapnNismo wrote:
Rachael Maddow rocks. I'd totally wreck her.
MADDOW: Do you think that a private business has the right to say we don't serve black people?
PAUL: I'm not in favor of any discrimination of any form. I would never belong to any club that excluded anybody for race. We still do have private clubs in America that can discriminate based on race.
But I think what's important about this debate is not written into any specific "gotcha" on this, but asking the question: what about freedom of speech? Should we limit speech from people we find abhorrent? Should we limit racists from speaking? I don't want to be associated with those people, but I also don't want to limit their speech in any way in the sense that we tolerate boorish and uncivilized behavior because that's one of the things freedom requires is that we allow people to be boorish and uncivilized, but that doesn't mean we approve of it. I think the problem with this debate is by getting muddled down into it, the implication is somehow that I would approve of
any racism or discrimination, and I don't in any form or fashion.
PAUL: I do defend and believe that the government should not be involved with institutional racism or discrimination or segregation in schools, busing, all those things. But had I been there, there would have been some discussion over one of the titles of the civil rights.
And I think that's a valid point, and still a valid discussion, because the thing is, is if we want to harbor in on private businesses and their policies, then you have to have the discussion about: do you want to abridge the First Amendment as well. Do you want to say that because people say abhorrent things -- you know, we still have this. We're having all this debate over hate speech and this and that. Can you have a newspaper and say abhorrent things? Can you march in a parade and believe in abhorrent things, you know?. . .
I really think that discrimination and racism is a horrible thing. And I don't want any form of it in our government, in our public sphere.
Video from the Maddow websitePaul: Well, I think what you've done is you bring up something that really is not an issue, nothing I've ever spoken about or have any indication that I'm interested in any legislation concerning. So, what you bring up is sort of a red herring. . . . It's a political ploy. I mean, it's brought up as an attack weapon from the other side, and that's the way it will be used.
But, you know, I think a lot of times these attacks fall back on themselves, and I don't think it will have any effect because the thing is, is that every fiber of my being doesn't believe in discrimination, doesn't believe that we should have that in our society. And to imply otherwise is just dishonest.
I don't know whether she ment it as a joke or if it's a serious gift.Publication of the Marquis de Sade's infamous works were subject to a lengthy court dispute in France, with Olympia losing in the end (Girodias eventually relocated to NY as America and the UK began liberalizing just as legendary Gallic tolerance shifted in another direction). The plot is simple: a group of amoral libertines retire to a sealed chateau with an entourage of innocent victims, all of whom are murdered in ways both sexual and Byzantine. De Sade's taste for death and torture may have exceeded the strength of his hand as after about many pages of exquisitely detailed sexual mayhem, he begins to dispatch the cast in wholesale lots. Still, it can inspire fantasies, if, we hope, not actions.
Or maybe the 20 minutes I played of it didn't impressive me as much as the 20 minutes of Dynasty Warriors.bennisboy wrote:
yes cos you totally get the most out of a game by playing it for 20 minutes.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
I bought BFBC2 for the PS3 yesterday. Played one online round than played Dynasty Warriors Gundam 2 for 9 hours. lol
I don't see the big deal over BFBC2, tbh.
In an example of Republican obstructionism rendered beautiful by its simplicity, the GOP yesterday killed a House bill that would increase funding for scientific research and math and science education by forcing Democrats to vote in favor of federal employees viewing pornography.
TPM is fair and balance, , does anyone have a link for this event from maybe CNN since I have a feeling TPM isn't telling the whole story?In an example of Republican obstructionism