Custom Localization files FTW.
Search
Search results: 823 found, showing up to 50
Cry me a river faggot.Lucien wrote:
I just saw the dumbest thread in this forum
this one guy thought that 5 people standing near a vehicle spawn holding E and one randomly getting it was a good idea. He didn't understand the concept of something as basic as "wait in line" and when I told him multiple times "wait in the fucking line or I'm going to make sure you never get this vehicle" I teamkilled him and went 38 for 0 while he spent the rest of the round crying about how unfair waiting in line is.
Take a look at the current worthless piece of shit vehicle system in BF2: a RANDOM player gets the vehicle. Cunt A gets the jet, he dies, Cunt A and Cunt B then both try to get the jet, hey presto Cunt A gets it again! repeat for the rest of the round. People like you are the reason that actually taking off is harder than staying alive the entire round. I would just teamkill you and then bomb you again the next time I flew over the airfield but unfortunately every single server in BF2 has german admins now, which is why I don't play anymore. I refuse to take part in the vehicle lotto.
I drove from the Overpass flag to the airfield in a tank because I wanted to fly. I got in the jet. Everyone else had bad luck.
If you need a line system to get the plane, then fuck you.
If you refuse to take part in the vehicle "lotto", then you're by no means pushed to it. Just don't take any vehicle, go on foot. But alas, I really don't care if you play or not anymore.
I'm tired of Karkand, so anything besides that is an improvement.
There were some people, but I arrived and the A10 spawned. I got in and flew off, only to get kicked midair.mtb0minime wrote:
Oh, so no one else was there when it spawned?MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
Nah, I was in a tank most of the round. I just had an urge to fly, and went to the hangar (Operation Road Rage) and luckily got in an A10 when it spawned. What followed was a kick from the server for "jumping the line".
It might be courtesy, but in the end its still stupid.
That is pretty stupid. Ridiculously stupid.
Nah, I was in a tank most of the round. I just had an urge to fly, and went to the hangar (Operation Road Rage) and luckily got in an A10 when it spawned. What followed was a kick from the server for "jumping the line".mtb0minime wrote:
There are tons and tons of servers with line systems.
Personally I kind of like it. Nice to give others a chance. And if you suck and keep getting shot down, it's time to let other people have a go at it.
Don't act so pretentious and like you're hot shit and are the only person who deserves to use a vehicle. It's just common courtesy to let people who have been waiting for it to try it out. (Even if they are idiots waiting around for the entire round and not helping out the team)
It might be courtesy, but in the end its still stupid.
I got kicked out of a server because I apparently jumped the airplane line.
Since when did BF2 have "lines" for vehicles?
That is the most stupid thing I've seen in this game so far.
Since when did BF2 have "lines" for vehicles?
That is the most stupid thing I've seen in this game so far.
Everybody knows that Patton is a noob.
You got hit with a fart from the engineer and it hit your nose, you died from the smell.
The Hammer, because people hate it when an engineer kills them.
Yo yo ima let you finish , BUT BEYONCE HAD ONE OF THE BEST VIDEO'S OF ALL TIME!Lai wrote:
Songhua bamboo bushes by far! Usually either as an engineer with a pump action shotty, or as a sniper with a knife, picking the kit merely for the ghillie suit.
Overpass on Operation Road Rage
Some server admins are crappy indeed.
Team killing is fun indeed.
2GB?
Hot dang! Oh well, the patch deserves the long download.
Hot dang! Oh well, the patch deserves the long download.
Apart from Gulf of Oman (Demo), when the game was released it was Wake Island. Fell in love with that map.
Finally a good answer, I will search it, thank you.Flecco wrote:
The Australian army avoids it because the bulk of serving combat troops an NCOs are male, and a few studies a while back showed that having females in the unit fucked with esprit de corp and fighting capabilities.MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
"Women are barred from combat roles but have been allowed in the last two decades to serve in a wide variety of other positions."usmarine wrote:
they do.
do you know anything?
That is what I meant, do you know how to read?
I should've know better to expect an intelligent answer from usmarine from the start.
Did I say Air Force? I said US ARMY didn't I?usmarine wrote:
there are women pilots and such. but i guess that is not fighting right? lulz
Gosh, I'm actually worried you're becoming more and more retarded each passing day, its not even funny anymore.
*Sigh*usmarine wrote:
i quoted varegg bucko.MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
I'm saying Chinese people are all over the place, and I asked you how that has to do anything with whatever this thread is supposed to be about.usmarine wrote:
are you saying Chinese people are terrorists?
and al-q is not a race. or a country.
you are failing terribly.
Let me see if I can explain it in the most simple manner:
The Geneva convention does not apply to a group that is all over th.... oh, you know what, fuck it. I don't want to discuss, I'm tired.
"Women are barred from combat roles but have been allowed in the last two decades to serve in a wide variety of other positions."usmarine wrote:
they do.MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
I still don't understand why women can't fight in the US ARMY
do you know anything?
That is what I meant, do you know how to read?
I'm saying Chinese people are all over the place, and I asked you how that has to do anything with whatever this thread is supposed to be about.usmarine wrote:
are you saying Chinese people are terrorists?MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
Chinese people too, so?usmarine wrote:
al-q doesn't have a country dude. they are all over the place.
Shit, any link to that footage?Flecco wrote:
No dude, hunting from a low flying helicopter is one of the most extreme things you can do.MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
Shoot them from helicopters? Why not drop a bomb? Much more entertainment.
I've seen footage of kiwi deer hunters from the golden age of hunting there. They were cracking off four shots from a semi auto at over 300ms from the deer. Moving chopper and moving deer and each shot would drop a deer. Bloody phenomenal in their heyday, the old kiwi deer hunters. Thing was, if a deer hunter wasn't droping like 2 deer in a minute using only 1 bullet per deer then he wasn't economically viable to hire. I know two of the fellas who were involved in this industry personally and watched a few docos on it... fucking amazing.
I still don't understand why women can't fight in the US ARMY, but congrats. 4-Star General, that is some serious BF2 online time.
Chinese people too, so?usmarine wrote:
al-q doesn't have a country dude. they are all over the place.Varegg wrote:
Tbh FEOS if your country was invaded i think you would have seen through the ROE and GC easily ... and when was the Insurgents invited to a signing of the GC ?
Shoot them from helicopters? Why not drop a bomb? Much more entertainment.
The dude sent a dead fish to an enemy, imagine what he will send to the leader of a country the US is in war with. A dead chicken?TheAussieReaper wrote:
Who's the terrorist here, the son, or the actual terrorist ffs?
The US citizens can't have any of that, Rahm Emanuel is a terrorist, he is the anti-Crist, Sarah Palin is our savior.
Its funny some people (well, actually one, Sealxo) suggesting to keep these people locked until the end of the war...
You're fighting terrorism, there is no end to that fight.
You're fighting terrorism, there is no end to that fight.
Patrick Cox is the best option for Secretary of State.
I'm gonna quote you on that and save it for the next 4 years, it may happen.Lotta_Drool wrote:
It was Obama's white half that got him elected. Just you wait and see, Jesse Jackson, Sheila Jackson, hell even Micheal Jackson is gonna call him out for acting white and shit.
He tricked the minorities by befriending Rev. Wright just to make the hood think he was one of them.
I'm not a hater, just saw thru his crap. He is whiter than Carrot Top TBH. Europe will hate him when he pulls all the troops out of there and puts them in Africa to spoon rice to the poor Muslims and Sally Stuthers. The Bear will march and Europe will get to experience real socialism, not that warm fuzzy shit that Cameron preaches, were talking getting gang banged in the gulag for playing on the Marines side in Strike at Karkand.
Uhm, you don't need to fire 1000 ICBM's, just one with a nuclear warhead an 1000 dummy short range missiles that at least reach the defense shield. And seeing how the defense shield is already near Russia...Commie Killer wrote:
1000 ICBMs are expensive, 1 ICBM is expensive. At the end of the day, a missile meant to travel the short distance to the interception point is cheaper then the missile designed to fly 7000 miles and carry a nuclear or a dummy warhead.MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
They don't need all missiles with nuclear warheads. Just launch one nuke and 1000 dummy missiles and the defense system wouldn't know which one to shoot at.Commie Killer wrote:
They already have the offensive capability. Figure a missile and a radar is cheaper then a nuclear tipped missile which must have its own blast proof shelter and all the extra maintenance.
They don't need all missiles with nuclear warheads. Just launch one nuke and 1000 dummy missiles and the defense system wouldn't know which one to shoot at.Commie Killer wrote:
They already have the offensive capability. Figure a missile and a radar is cheaper then a nuclear tipped missile which must have its own blast proof shelter and all the extra maintenance.MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
I think they don't do it because its cheaper to develop offensive capabilities (and widens the deterrent power) compared to a defense network.Commie Killer wrote:
Wouldn't that be nice....
But seriously. What the fuck is preventing Russia from creating their own. We all know that both the FSB/former KGB/etc. and the CIA/NSA/DIA/etc. are good at stealing each others secrets.
Stings doesn't it?usmarine wrote:
ughMek-Stizzle wrote:
the guy usmarine voted forSamTheMan:D wrote:
who won?
LOL, I just reread my comment and saw a lot of grammar mistakes. I didn't meant to say gay, I meant to say guy. On "bit" vagina is was supposed to be "big" vagina.ELITE-UK wrote:
Sorry but what? You must be jokingMGS3_GrayFox wrote:
Give her the dick one last time, then take off privileges of the dick for 6 months (for her, you keep shagging girls all you want, you deserve it).
If she gets the dick from another gay in those 6 months, go ballistic and expose ever little secret you know about her. Tell people she has a bit vagina, that a mexican midget lives in there and that you poked him with your buddy when you were banging her on all fours.
Thats it, and yes, I'm serious
I think they don't do it because its cheaper to develop offensive capabilities (and widens the deterrent power) compared to a defense network.Commie Killer wrote:
Wouldn't that be nice....MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
Yes, isn't it online?usmarine wrote:
he built it himself?
But seriously. What the fuck is preventing Russia from creating their own. We all know that both the FSB/former KGB/etc. and the CIA/NSA/DIA/etc. are good at stealing each others secrets.
Give her the dick one last time, then take off privileges of the dick for 6 months (for her, you keep shagging girls all you want, you deserve it).
If she gets the dick from another gay in those 6 months, go ballistic and expose ever little secret you know about her. Tell people she has a bit vagina, that a mexican midget lives in there and that you poked him with your buddy when you were banging her on all fours.
If she gets the dick from another gay in those 6 months, go ballistic and expose ever little secret you know about her. Tell people she has a bit vagina, that a mexican midget lives in there and that you poked him with your buddy when you were banging her on all fours.
Yes, isn't it online?usmarine wrote:
he built it himself?MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
What about the SDI President Reagan built on space himself?usmarine wrote:
you know...we cant just place them where ever the hell we want. people had to agree to them. so, and of course, no discussion about that at all.
What about the SDI President Reagan built on space himself?usmarine wrote:
you know...we cant just place them where ever the hell we want. people had to agree to them. so, and of course, no discussion about that at all.
Bullshit. Bush played COD4 and thought it was real, and he ordered a missile defense system be planted on Europe..Sup wrote:
Thats why its pointless to place missiles in Europe. And stupid.Commie Killer wrote:
I cant understand how people are OK with living under the threat of nuclear annihilation.
I also cant understand how people think this shield will allow the US to do anything. Missiles launched towards North America would come over the North Pole, or the South Pole in the case of FOBS. Missiles only travel across Europe in CoD4.
Being gay is not a disease caught midlife, people are born gay or they don't.GraphicArtist J wrote:
Says you, IMHO... Government(that's including PUBLIC schools...High Schools etc) need to back off sexual preference education.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
I don't think sexuality of any kind needs to be taught in schools unless the class is specific to that topic, which shouldn't happen until well into high school. ....^ Like I said before...Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
... regardless of what you call it (marriage or otherwise) just so you can feel better about discriminating against a group of people with which you disagree.
- hospital visitation rights
- medical decision rights
- tax breaks
- social security benefits
- inheritance
- joint tax filing
- child custody issues
- health insurance from many employers
- things said between husband and wife are protected in a court of law, and things said between *** partners are not protected in a court of law.
"I don't really care that much that gays marry each other..." "the gay agenda wants to force down their ideals on our kids, and our government taking part of that." Give them those "economical" rights except the: "- child custody issues", Blame biology, it's not society's fault that they can't procreate. Off topic but that's basically brings it back with the gays on kids issue.
...
All I ask that they keep their sexual ideals from our kids, is that too much to ask?
And why can't gay couples have child custody issues? What is your excuse for that? Are you saying gay couples can't raise children? Because I've seen some crappy heterosexual couples that suck at raising kids.
Awww, South Park is over. Too short in my opinion.
With audio from last nights speech? Well maybe they just stuck it in last minute, but its quite impressive anyways.usmarine wrote:
i reckon it has been ready for a whileMGS3_GrayFox wrote:
Quite impressive how fast they do the episodes.
You seeing it? Quite impressive how fast they do the episodes.Kmarion wrote:
Well South Park wasted no time.
Have fun with a cold winter Europe, looks like you earned it.
Jajajaja, this episode is awesome. Obama, Obama! Funny as hell.
Well, we just learned that black people do better speeches than white people.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Well I must admit I am pretty damn special.Kmarion wrote:
It is when it has never happened before. Surely it means something. I'm not saying throw a party every time from here on out. But it takes a special kind of asshole to downplay this benchmark.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Right, it should be a special occasion when a black person is elected into public office.
Playing it up is possibly the most racist thing to do at the moment short of a lynching. Are black people inferior somehow? Do they not make speeches as well as white people? Do they have better economic plans than white people?
Obama won because Obama bested McCain. Blacks did not "beat" whites for once, Obama beat McCain.
edit: and K you only know what, 5? 6? /44? lol, that kind of ratio is close to the actual percentage of blacks in the U.S.
And since there are more black rappers than white rappers, they have better economic plans (and plans being cd's).
Ouch, I'm sorry the armed forces didn't meet your expectations.God Save the Queen wrote:
I was in it to stomp out puerto ricansMGS3_GrayFox wrote:
You were in the armed forces, and by other people's post (who have also been in armed forces), soldiers are all in for the humanitarian help and the unquestioned desire to free oppressed people everywhere.usmarine wrote:
kiddo?
then show me what makes you think i would say that?
You were in the armed forces, and by other people's post (who have also been in armed forces), soldiers are all in for the humanitarian help and the unquestioned desire to free oppressed people everywhere.usmarine wrote:
kiddo?MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
Iraq? We're talking about Vietnam here kiddo.usmarine wrote:
where did i EVER say that about iraq? pls show it or as usual...shut up.
then show me what makes you think i would say that?
Iraq? We're talking about Vietnam here kiddo.usmarine wrote:
where did i EVER say that about iraq? pls show it or as usual...shut up.MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
You would've bitched and moaned about how you wanted to free the Vietnamese people from their ruthless dictator (I know, I know).
You would've bitched and moaned about how you wanted to free the Vietnamese people from their ruthless dictator (I know, I know).usmarine wrote:
hmmmmmm...doesnt matter. he should have stopped it..Sup wrote:
JFK inherited the growing conflict from Eisenhower/Nixon.usmarine wrote:
oh...did you forget Nam?
I doubt they affect you, and if they do, then you should get some therapy because you're homophobic.The#1Spot wrote:
You know a lot of gay people are very public about it..Sup wrote:
People can do whatever they want in their personal life unless they are harming someone else while doing it.
I bet she did it again the same night.m3thod wrote:
She will do it again. Sooner or later it will happen.
Who's with me?!