12 degrees 1 hour north of NYC
Search
Search results: 2,212 found, showing up to 50
http://www.aolnews.com/2011/02/14/iran- … 3%7C201286
Police Disperse Iranian Protesters With Tear Gas
Feb 14, 2011
sounds like a fun nite for all !UnkleRukus wrote:
You should try to invade my house and try to find them, I have a spare Mission Accomplished banner* if you want to borrow it when you're done.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
That would bring you runnin no doubt. Some people have " Super Secret weapons " too ! ROFLMAOUnkleRukus wrote:
Super secret tea party, need a special handshake and reacharound to get in.
Ps. we know you can't have things hidden in your house in the People's Republic of Mass.
* whats that refer to ?
Never said I was a Tea Party member, you can't read. That speaks volumes.JohnG@lt wrote:
The fact that you consider yourself a tea partier speaks volumes..Hunter/Jumper wrote:
B@tch.. you know Jack shit about the Tea Party or who represents them. The Tea Party doesn't have a Representative, it is Grass Roots. Why don't you make another divergent post on masturbation, clearly that is your expertise. " I build Sky scrapers " lol You are a joke. Go back to complaining about Italics and punctuation , ! . . .; @ssholeJohnG@lt wrote:
Instead, people like this were allowed to represent them...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5hAKbBs … re=channel
Again you know jack shit, You're poster child for hypocrisy and contradiction.JohnG@lt wrote:
You're the poster child for everything that went wrong with the movement. ..
Been to a rally J@rk or are you " just regurgitating " what you heard ? Bullshit artist that you are.JohnG@lt wrote:
It started as a movement for fiscal conservatives and ended up being a carbon copy of the republican party except with a different name and that somehow made the members of the group feel differently about their opinions. ..
Again, You don't know a dam thing. Your the one who just " regurgitates " the phlegm the networks spew and you do it word for word, Oh You forgot to call them racists.JohnG@lt wrote:
The tea party didn't spawn because the republicans were not conservative enough. It spawned because of the damn bank bailouts. It really had nothing to do with anything else until Fox n Friends coopted it and turned it into some uber conservative thing for all the people who rightfully feel ostracized by the republicans because they are too damn fringe. ..
Yea Right J@RK, that is what it was, Minus the Riots, Vandalism, Arson, Mass arrests, damage to public property, etc etc.. So who's the Parrot you dumb steer. ? go build a Sky Scraper and make sure you share your witticisms in the elevator with your co-Workers, That is unless your are a total poser and a fraud in your views and have to hide who you really are.JohnG@lt wrote:
It was basically a right wing version of what happens at every G20 summit when all the anarchists show up.
That would bring you runnin no doubt. Some people have " Super Secret weapons " too ! ROFLMAOUnkleRukus wrote:
Super secret tea party, need a special handshake and reacharound to get in.Jaekus wrote:
What's the Tea Tea Party?
B@tch.. you know Jack shit about the Tea Party or who represents them. The Tea Party doesn't have a Representative, it is Grass Roots. Why don't you make another divergent post on masturbation, clearly that is your expertise. " I build Sky scrapers " lol You are a joke. Go back to complaining about Italics and punctuation , ! . . .; @ssholeJohnG@lt wrote:
Instead, people like this were allowed to represent them...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5hAKbBs … re=channel
clearly you know jack shit about the Tea Tea partyJohnG@lt wrote:
The Tea Party is an even bigger joke than the mainstream Republican party. That thing got corrupted and co-opted so quickly that the libertarians who started it are still suffering from whiplash.lowing wrote:
I can see that, and the American public sees it as well, hence the Tea Party movement and the rise of the independents, slowly but surely. There is absolutely no hope in the liberal agenda, and it is clear the Republicans are not going to be the answerJohnG@lt wrote:
That really doesn't have anything to do with what I said. I said the Republicans lack a cohesive platform of their own. Half of them care about social issues above all else and the other half light a candle for Saint Reagan before bed. They don't stand for anything. At least with Bush you knew he was a neo-con and where he was coming from. The Republicans right now, today, are just an amorphous blob of populist talking points and no real agenda. As much as I disagree with liberals on issues like government scope and spending, at least you know where they stand. There's no William F Buckley alive today to lead the way, just talking heads that like to yell at their guests for ratings boosts. Hell, the majority of those that claim that they are fiscally conservative do so because it's supposedly part of their ideology without actually knowing what it means. They care more about forcing social conformity than anything else.
Instead, people like this were allowed to represent them...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5hAKbBs … re=channel
Oh that problem. That is a ' herd ' thing you have going on. Noses to asses as you all follow the loudest beat.presidentsheep wrote:
Somehow I don't think it's the rest of us with the problem...
That just means your slow. The more you read, the easier it will get.presidentsheep wrote:
I have to read your posts like 4 times before I've worked out where the punctuation should actually be and made sense of it.
Even then they still seem a complete mess of words.
bitch ? lol that's your name here. any of this ring a bell faggot ? See BelowJohnG@lt wrote:
Bitch, please. The day you have an intellectual thought is the day that Jesus comes riding down from the heavens on a velociraptor to destroy the heathens.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
stfu if you have no input.JohnG@lt wrote:
Christ, you have to be trolling. You can't possibly be this stupid.
l
\/
Seems you changed your tune huh. " Take a man, take away Reason and Accountability " and you have ... A women.How did you ever come to this conclusion this is naive and a academic over simplification and its completely unfounded by any information I ever was aware of. Most of our overseas deployments have been humanitarian,JohnG@lt wrote:
This leads into point #2. Having a strong military leads to its use overseas.In the days of the bow and arrow you kept a field cut short around you place so no one could get in range about 50 yards ( that's where the front lawn concept came from) with the advent of the ballitica trabuche catapult. You needed a bigger field preferable with water in the perefery of range so the weapon couldn't be deployed Ideally they had to cross the water and try and set the weapon up while in range of the fortifications defences. Weapon ranges increased some since than. Missile can cross the poles in break down carefully the word intercontinental Ballistic Missile. If you don't want to send one ICBM to get another you may have to than send a plane soldier helicopter If you only suspect an ICBM and it hidden from satellite you may have to send etc. You do realize the USA has interest that are over seas only 48 states are continental. we have the right to and must actively protect commerce. If you want to leave the muslims in croatia hanging that's ok with me but not everyone will agree.JohnG@lt wrote:
Why do we need a military larger than what is necessary to defend our borders?we did get a return it was called peace. Not to mention money spent on a deterrent weapons system gets back into the economy They hire a worker he buys a house the builder buys a bout the boat yard guy can buy an new VCR( the 80s ) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX so the Vidieo store expands and hires Simple.JohnG@lt wrote:
Why should we waste money on something we'll never get a return on?
That is why I started calling you a bitch. Its not personal. You have no Reason or Accountability!
thought they did... (I have been following your rebuttals to Lowing.)Dilbert_X wrote:
Is that all? I assumed they'd infect us with the rage virus.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Oh those? They can also cut glass with their mandibles, and are known for laying eggs in your ears.Dilbert_X wrote:
I think South Australia must be due for a plague of flying poisonous spiders.
a big score for me is 650 so I am impressed.
I saw something very similar in 1979.-Sh1fty- wrote:
I like what Obama said, you don't see this kind of thing every day. This is quite a historic moment we're living through.
I also saw an Iranian protest that obozo had no interest in. I always wondered why he didn't show any kind of moral support or interest in that but is salivating over this as is the media. They didn't seem to care when saddam fell, Except for bill mahr.
stfu if you have no input.JohnG@lt wrote:
Christ, you have to be trolling. You can't possibly be this stupid.Mekstizzle wrote:
You guys (well, some) are the one's that didn't want this happening. There was only one way you were gonna stop it. Shit. Don't get mad at me when I say it as it is. The US has a monopoly on violence with countries like this. So it could do it. Not that it wouldn't hurt massively. But if people hold views like Brinson about the hegemony and keeping dictators in power, and the people down. For the sake of the nation. Then they should be able to put that sort of talk into action.JohnG@lt wrote:
FOAD.
I'm all eyes and ears for a country trying to build an empire, they can try. I'd like to see how well it would go.
Seems like everyone is celebrating, you'd think they had captured Saddam ?
You know something is amiss when you enter a room full of enemy soldiers with an automatic shotgun and go for your knife instead.
Thats what I thought...plus you have a half a sec before it Fogs out.. I work around it
Who puts the Buoys back when the Rivers Ice moves them down stream, the Coast Guard ?
Why are thousands of Crows sitting on the river ice at sun set ? I mean thousands and thousands - I never saw so many birds in deep winter. Don't crows migrate ?
Why are thousands of Crows sitting on the river ice at sun set ? I mean thousands and thousands - I never saw so many birds in deep winter. Don't crows migrate ?
It is the uncertainty that makes people worry, " better the devil you know... "Macbeth wrote:
I love how some people in the media are worried about protecting Israel, a country of less than 8 million, to the point where they want Egypt, a country of 80 million, to remain a dictatorship.
Don't look at me, I didn't put em there, and a lot of em lived there already... oh wait " Yawn " ( rapier wit, No ? )AussieReaper wrote:
Or that it is your birthright to outright own anothers country.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Unless your religion tells you to kill civilians.Dilbert_X wrote:
Its a normal rule of warfare, and in the Geneva convention IIRC, that killing civilian unnecessarily or disproportionately to the military objective is a war crime.
that is some argument, perhaps it is time to withdraw.AussieReaper wrote:
Yawn.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
obviously this was well before your time and " you need a history lesson "AussieReaper wrote:
The British virtually shrugged off the Argentinians. Do you need a history lesson in everything?
Unless your religion tells you to kill civilians.Dilbert_X wrote:
Its a normal rule of warfare, and in the Geneva convention IIRC, that killing civilian unnecessarily or disproportionately to the military objective is a war crime.
obviously this was well before your time and " you need a history lesson "AussieReaper wrote:
The British virtually shrugged off the Argentinians. Do you need a history lesson in everything?lowing wrote:
what about it?AussieReaper wrote:
Falkland Islands.
at this point you should ' pull a D@lt ', as that is some pretty weak stuff your serving.Dilbert_X wrote:
Why don't you try reading a history book, instead of parroting neo-nazi blogs and Fox.
Hunter/Jumper wrote:
You forgot ~ Attack the Messenger ! ~. Remember My " Rape Tree " thread lollowing wrote:
Well, it is no coincidence that this forum reflects real life tactics by the left. The 5 D's of the liberal argument... dodge, deception, deflect, deny, discredit.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
I almost commented on " the insults not helping " but I must sound like a broken record at this point. Compared to D@lt and D~Bag, he is pretty cool and he doesn't switch topics in every rebuttal. On the whole at least I can learn a little from this guy if I don't agree with most of the views. He makes me pay more attention.
Constantly accuse of racism and Inciting Violence ! , ( until irrefutable proof shows you are actually the guilty ones, ,,,then plead for civility in discourse )Why don't you try reading a history book, instead of parroting neo-nazi blogs and Fox.
ha haDilbert_X wrote:
In cases like this the media should show a bit of restraint now and then.
Ice breakers working out in Hudson River
You forgot ~ Attack the Messenger ! ~. Remeber My " Rape Tree " thread lollowing wrote:
Well, it is no coincidence that this forum reflects real life tactics by the left. The 5 D's of the liberal argument... dodge, deception, deflect, deny, discredit.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
I almost commented on " the insults not helping " but I must sound like a broken record at this point. Compared to D@lt and D~Bag, he is pretty cool and he doesn't switch topics in every rebuttal. On the whole at least I can learn a little from this guy if I don't agree with most of the views. He makes me pay more attention.
LOL Next D-Bag will be telling me ' I ' am derailing the thead.
I almost commented on " the insults not helping " but I must sound like a broken record at this point. Compared to D@lt and D~Bag, he is pretty cool and he doesn't switch topics in every rebuttal. On the whole at least I can learn a little from this guy if I don't agree with most of the views. He makes me pay more attention.
A guerrilla armyAussieReaper wrote:
What army does Palestine have again?
You justified the last aggression by Israel due to a couple of rocket attacks.
I read it all. I found this little line particularly poignant.Varegg wrote:
I'll give you a cluelowing wrote:
then downplay it with some information, ya know, something other than you said so. Because from what I read, you are full of shit.Varegg wrote:
Are you plain stupid or don't you read what is written before you answer?
My initial point was to downplay the so called media imposed significance of the MB in Egypt ... the BS falls on your account for not comprehending the simplest pieces of factorial linguistics presented in this thread
In that wiki-link YOU provided you can actually find the hard facts about the MB in Egypt ... if you had read your links you would have known this and wouldn't have been in need of that very information you now ask for that you yourself provided in the first place ...
So now that you have given us hard facts that you truly are a dumbass I wonder what's next ...
In my opinion " The hard facts " seem to Buttress Lowings point.While the Muslim Brotherhood and their Saudi financiers have worked to cement Islamist influence over Germany's Muslim community, they have not limited their infiltration to Germany. Thanks to generous foreign funding, meticulous organization, and the naivete of European elites...
USA has the moon. we got it fair and square and peacefully. and none a you F*k'rs is allowed up there by the way....presidentsheep wrote:
Can't think of any countries off the top of my head that have gained land peacefully.
Anytime I'll show you Manhattan, cool places you wouldn'y find on your own. I have a condo there still. Don't use it.presidentsheep wrote:
I'd love to get drunk with you lowing and put the world to rights. I bet you're a funny drunk.
Why ? people are still exchanging views, making cases and rebuttals.Jaekus wrote:
Yeah, unfortunately the thread really needs to be closed now.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Don't look at me. I only wanted to make sure I was getting both points of view. I least I F*kin tried.ghettoperson wrote:
I just came in here to wonder how the fuck we'd been talking about radio for 23 pages, but now I see in typical fashion that stopped after the first 5 posts.
" Debate and Serious talk "
They usually don't close it until some J@RK shows up cursing.
I don't mind that it strayed. I got a lot of good info in the beginning, Then Dbag showed up with his F*Ck the USA rant.
We are all used to it.
He didn't support it was the point, why do you bother to check in if you aren't staying current ?Dilbert_X wrote:
He had plenty to say, its just Fox didn't report it.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
What I find ' suspicious ' [sic] is that he didn't have a word to say about the Iranian protests.
" Good god, you should host a TV show on FOX "UnkleRukus wrote:
Anti-American outcomes? Good god, you should host a TV show on FOX.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Do you see an insinuation ? Not my intent. On that subject, It is common knowledge that he was a muslim until he got involved in politics.UnkleRukus wrote:
Are you insinutating that Obama is muslim?
In black communities being of a devote christian faith is a prerequisite for election.
My intent was " he seems to want Anti American outcomes. " allot of what he does seems designed to hinder Our Country.
Hard to believe that this man was a muslim at some point when his father was a COMFIRMED ATHEIST and his mother studied diferent religions.
How could you weigh in with an opinion if you know so little about the man ?
Don't look at me. I only wanted to make sure I was getting both points of view. I least I F*kin tried.ghettoperson wrote:
I just came in here to wonder how the fuck we'd been talking about radio for 23 pages, but now I see in typical fashion that stopped after the first 5 posts.CC-Marley wrote:
Isn't this thread about finding a lefty talk show host that will rival Rush and co?
lost again, Oh well...UnkleRukus wrote:
Honestly, I thought he was looking for certain sound clips from Rush and Hannity.CC-Marley wrote:
Isn't this thread about finding a lefty talk show host that will rival Rush and co?
more the winding directionless path his argument takes. He always responds with a topic that wasn't in question. Soon he will be caterwauling about Nixon's invasion of Cambodia or some dam thing. Also in other threads, he just adds one line insults never to be heard from again on the topic. The Bitch label referred to that I believe. The woman's lack of accountability.Varegg wrote:
^^ So if you believe that Jews are harassing their Palestinian populace you must be stone?
Sounds like some really good logic right there ...
Do you see an insinuation ? Not my intent. On that subject, It is common knowledge that he was a muslim until he got involved in politics.UnkleRukus wrote:
Are you insinutating that Obama is muslim?Hunter/Jumper wrote:
What I find ' suspicious ' [sic] is that he didn't have a word to say about the Iranian protests, but weighs in on the muslim brotherhood's side on this one. He seems to have a defiant slant/agenda.UnkleRukus wrote:
Weren't people bitching about Bush spending too much of his time meddling in the affairs of other countries? Yet when Obama doesn't meddle in the affairs of other countries it's the end of the goddamn world.
Anyone else find that suspicious?
In black communities being of a devote christian faith is a prerequisite for election.
My intent was " he seems to want Anti American outcomes. " allot of what he does seems designed to hinder Our Country.
That in itself could effect the outcome.Trotskygrad wrote:
it seems that the general consensus is that he is not wielding said influence in EgyptHunter/Jumper wrote:
...he could indeed have a lot of influence in what becomes of Egypt, by design or not...
IE: If Radical elements realize western influence will not come into play, They might be more willing to put all their chips in and go for broke.
Further, he did try to influence it in one direction, but lost his will and backpedaled. SOP
What I find ' suspicious ' [sic] is that he didn't have a word to say about the Iranian protests, but weighs in on the muslim brotherhood's side on this one. He seems to have a defined slant/agenda. Further, I don't feel obozo is " off topic " in that he could indeed have a lot of influence in what becomes of Egypt, by design or not. So if you don't like it, feel free to 'not respond' by responding.UnkleRukus wrote:
Weren't people bitching about Bush spending too much of his time meddling in the affairs of other countries? Yet when Obama doesn't meddle in the affairs of other countries it's the end of the goddamn world.
Anyone else find that suspicious?
Please tell us you are stoned. It is now the only way for you to retain some sense of honor. We can all have a good laugh and you can start over in 24* hours.Dilbert_X wrote:
Which is different from jewish terrorists driving out gentiles from Palestine how?lowing wrote:
If we can't even agree that Islamic terrorism is based on driving out the "non-beleivers" from Islamic lands
* Which is all it takes for your cronies to forget anything they may have read.
? ? ? ? WTF ? ? ?AussieReaper wrote:
You know, Hitler had that exact same reasoning when he invaded Versailles.
.
These same people say they " don't understand my sentences ". Keep that in mind when you march to their drum.
Thank you for responding with your ' non response '. lolDilbert_X wrote:
Not going to respond to another derail.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
He lead his own party off a cliff and now he has lots of advice for other world leaders.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Hasn't he for the most part?
Is this guy for real or did he watch to many hot dogs cook by pressing his face to the microwave window too ?
.Dilbert_X wrote:
Someone else deconstruct lowing's arguments for him, I'm too fat and too lazy.
/\
l
A lot of this going around too lol.
Lotta that going around, I believe the other g@y watched to many hot dogs cook with his face pressed to the Microwave window.lowing wrote:
More proof, you indeed argue like a bitch.Dilbert_X wrote:
Yes you have, see here it is - in your next sentence.lowing wrote:
You refuse to acknowledge that I never said anything like that, even after you could not prove I did when challenged.lowing wrote:
Try arguing against what has been said about Islam and the facts posted on sites dedicated to exposing it for what is done in its name. Argue against the information........for once.
Sorry it is a fact. That is the only time I ever heard a " muslim reject violence " and OMG FOX found her and gave her air time.Dilbert_X wrote:
Bigoted and 'stereo typical' much?Hunter/Jumper wrote:
The only time I have ever heard a muslim reject violence was a Muslim speaker on " OMG FOX. "
How would is this a reflection on me or for that matter cast anyone in a Bigoted light ?, except maybe the other networks who didn't give moderate muslims air time.
Not true at all.Dilbert_X wrote:
Well, Christians pretty well only cater to Christians, .
I don't think so. Not from the Jews I have met. Could you be some what bigoted and stereo typical in your views ? I never before accused anyone here of racism or prejudice here. this is a first for me so I tread lightly.Dilbert_X wrote:
and Jews only ever send money to Israel.