BF2S Forums Search

SuperJail Warden wrote:

I just Spoiler (highlight to read):
had sex with an Asian girl and cummed in her mouth.

I am now sitting on her bed watching Law and Order SVU. She is now having an argument on the phone with some guy she went out on a date with yesterday I guess? She is upset another girl called him on the phone and other stuff.

This girls asks "are you fucking somebody else" every time we are together. And apparently she is still doing her own thing too. But she just had a whole argument with some other dude while I am here watching TV. The TV I bought 😂

I am genuinely perplexed. I am going to asks her what is going on when she comes back to bed.

SuperJail Warden wrote:

Congratulations Ken. You were the first of the BF2s crew to wife up an Asian lady.

Larssen wrote:

I don't have social media so no issues there. Date #1 is  down and brother did I get catfished lmao. She was a good looking girl but didnt resemble her pictures at all.

This was actually my first online date ever haha. God the first 5 minutes of this stuff are awkward as fuck

SuperJail Warden wrote:

I am not perfect and I realize I sent this girl on an emotional rollercoaster. I didn't understand how my actions affected her. And I took her emotions for granted. I learned important lessons and I will do better next time.

I did enjoy having a monogamous relationship for as long as it lasted. That is definitely something I would want again with a different person.

I am not angry at her or anything. I wish her the best. I am grateful to her for the opportunity to practice being in a relationship with someone. I am sorry I turned her into a puddle and I spent like 12 hours yesterday on the phone with her while she was laid up in bed depressed.

I DID NOT reactivate my dating apps. I want to just be single and work on myself until spring maybe summer. I have some graduate stuff I needed to do. When spring rolls back around, I am not going to be weird about getting as much as I can. I was sad yesterday when I didn't get a 'Good morning' text from her.

We had some fundamental differences in life and if she or anyone else said I used this as an opportunity to break up with her while also loading her with the blame for it I wouldn't debate it.

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

H Mart is Korean

uziq wrote:

it is broad and heavy handed. i’m not defending it or the recent public order acts.

i have to say, though, if i was in a role of public responsibility, say like a fucking police officer who is supposed to uphold public standards … i simply would not join PC plod group chats and post racist and sexist remarks. you’ve got to be a special sort of stupid to be a police officer in an org like the london met who are weekly embroiled in a scandal, and think this is in any way a good idea. the london met are starting to look as institutionally rotten as the 1990s LAPD. not the brightest bunch of bulbs over there.

uziq wrote:

i can’t say i’ve ever been in a ‘banter with the boys’ group chat where a member has kidnapped, raped and murdered someone. so erm, good riddance to human trash? “tough shit to the offended” bereaved dauntless, really? this was a case where a woman was kidnapped because she trusted a man in uniform. you don’t see the exceptional circumstances here where a bunch of people in trusted uniform conduct themselves this way?

uziq wrote:

this isn’t really a simple case of “oh, you can’t handle an offensive remark?”

uziq wrote:

and i’m not the guy who voted for the conservatives, the party who promote this tough on crime bullshit. dauntless is a paying member. may, priti and suella are his calendar pinup home secs. so, er, write an email to your own local MP there matey?

uziq wrote:

w/r/t the communications act, this is the first case i’ve heard of a private whatsapp chat being used as an example of abuse. did the guy appeal? i haven’t been in the UK following this or even the murder case antecedent to it. i have heard of a few instances of people being given community service for being abusive on twitter, which even then seemed heavy-handed to me.

On 19 December 2012, to strike a balance between freedom of speech and criminality, the Director of Public Prosecutions issued interim guidelines, clarifying when social messaging is eligible for criminal prosecution under UK law.

The revisions specified that prosecutors should consider:

whether messages were aggravated by references to race, religion or other minorities, and whether they breached existing rules to counter harassment or stalking; and
the age and maturity of any wrongdoer should be taken into account and given great weight.

The revisions also clarified that criminal prosecutions were "unlikely":

when the author of the message had "expressed genuine remorse";
when "swift and effective action ... to remove the communication" was taken; or
when messages were not intended for a wide audience.

uziq wrote:

i don't think most private whatsapp chats are 'fair game' in the law. i believe that law was signed into place to prevent online abuse from people on social networks. you'd think it's 'public' by the fact it has to cause an offence or annoyance to someone at some point, i.e. either a targeted and abusive message or some third-party whom you wouldn't normally intend for that message to see, thereby it being a 'public communication'.

The judge said although messages were never intended to be made public, those people and groups referenced “will undoubtedly have been caused great distress by learning police officers found it funny to joke about them in such a deeply offensive manner”.

The judge said the messages were “made fun of people or group of persons they had sworn an oath to protect”.

uziq wrote:

the UK has signed some ridiculously draconian public laws into the books lately. it's effectively illegal to protest now, for similarly phrased reasons. causing a public nuisance or 'annoyance' can get your protest shut down. well, what sort of public protest doesn't cause a mild annoyance in some way or other? they're supposed to be seen and heard!

uziq wrote:

the specifics of that case are pretty dodgy. tied into a much bigger story about institutional misogyny and sexism in the police force. i can definitely see the 'public interest' aspect in what a bunch of plods say to one another in their work-group whatsapp chats. someone from that group was a policeman who raped and murdered someone ... it's hardly idle banter between a bunch of private mates. it's coppers egging each other on with hate speech ... and one of them fucking picked a woman up whilst dressed as a copper, abused her trust, and murdered her!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Sarah_Everard

uziq wrote:

we live in a weird world where services like whatsapp are simultaneously used between mates but also used by people in professional capacities. MPs at westminster are all in giant, 'private' whatsapp chats, for example, but obviously it's in the public interest to see those chats if they're all conniving and conspiring and arranging corrupt deals, you know? so with a bunch of policemen who are all in the same group chat, it's not really as if they're there because they're mates from down the pub, is it? it's a bit of a grey area. whatsapp isn't an 'official' communications channel for any of these organisations but it has become really closely enmeshed with people's use in a professional/public capacity.

Dilbert_X wrote:

I used to work with a guy who thought fuel injection was a step too far, he didn't want a computer controlling his engine.

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or
(b)causes any such message or matter to be so sent.
(2)A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he—
(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that he knows to be false,
(b)causes such a message to be sent; or
(c)persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.
(3)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both.

SuperJail Warden wrote:

I don't emotionally or physically abuse them. I know that bar is on the ground but going by what women tell me alone, a lot of guys treat them way worse.

...

I am going to be more clear about my intentions with girls going forward since I am aware I could love bomb and dangle a potential relationship in front of a girl to get what I want (#Stories.) I would be unsurprised if a few girls are actually more interested in me once I have a partner.

I just need to think up a way to convince the girl I am with to let me indulge my sexual impulses in return for being a loving and caring partner.

How do I broach this conversation?

SuperJail Warden wrote:

This situation is crazy and stupid

uziq wrote:

you gonna get your INSEAD gf to dress up in a 'slutty vampire nurse' outfit?

SuperJail Warden wrote:

I was texting last night with her and the Chinese girl at the same time. The Chinese girl is talking about her day. While the white girl is talking about her life plans and how we can move to a small town together and start a family together.

Seeing the messages come in at the same time and I am looking at it like I am going to have to crush one of these girls. Because I can't juggle two of them. And I thought "I should just kill myself. Just hang myself in the bathroom. I won't have to deal with any of this anymore." Obviously it was a fleeting thought 💭 and I am not serious. No one ever killed themselves because they have too many girls after them. But the whole thing is a lot to manage. I came home from work just to text them all day. I couldn't play video games, I couldn't watch disaster porn, I couldn't do work since I am texting them back and forth.

uziq wrote:

i wouldn't have ever met the guy in the first place because i don't hang out at 'glamour' clubs in the west end waiting to meet reality tv stars, mate.

uziq wrote:

you also still didn't address the basic and irrefutable point: if you're still dressing up in fancy-dress and going to halloween-themed parties in your 30s, you're a straight-up loser mate. no arguing against that one! sorry, you do not pass GO!

Cybargs wrote:

i never understood why those who hate government want to even get into it. i still find it funny dauntless didnt like rishi cos he was 'too indian', never mind the other baggage.

uziq wrote:

i pay my taxes just the same as you do. or are you saying that your political opinion should be worth more because you earn a bit more money than i do? lol interesting theory of democracy there, chump. no wonder you look down on the little poor people

uziq wrote:

and that majority aren't composed mostly of email scammers and wastemen in the street who want to shout at you.

uziq wrote:

you are literally a part of this party. your bunch of highly intelligent natural born winners just torpedo'd the economy through an unforced error. leg before wicket mate. poor people's mortgages are going to skyrocket because of your little libertarian darling.

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

I just finished reading an article about people suffering below the poverty line and unable to afford healthy food even with JobSeeker (one guy with diabetes basically killing himself just to stay fed). I'd say you have it pretty nice being able to debate on whether or not to drop 4k on a revolver.

uziq wrote:

guy out here complaining on the weekly about paying taxes but has $10,000 for something that might one day be as good as a pocket calculator. haha.

SuperJail Warden wrote:

I am going to buy a Google Pixel Smartwatch

You can send and read text messages on it.

SuperJail Warden wrote:

I am writing down all of my SluttyConfessions here and elsewhere then condensing it into one new Reddit profile. Here is "The Soldier Story" in full detail. Maybe Detective Dilbert or Special Prosecutor Newbie can save it for later.

I (32m) slept with a childhood friend (26f) when she had a boyfriend she later married, had a kid with, and divorced. After she found a new boyfriend, she cheated on him with me too.

This saga started when we were both 26.

She is now also 32. I had to go back to college to get some professional credentials. While in class on the first day, I noticed a petite light skinned Puerto Rican girl sitting next to me. I looked at her and started talking. We both recognized each other. We were friends in high school. I still saw her Facebook profile picture but otherwise lost contact. She must have seen my profile picture come up in her recommended too. She recognized me instantly which surprised me since we weren’t particularly close in high school and that was 8 years beforehand. We started chatting and when class was over, we left together.

We went to Dunkin Donuts together and caught up. She made me aware she was dating a childhood friend of ours that I was close with but only when we were kids. I offered her a ride home and she accepted. When I dropped her off in front of her home late at night, we shared a moment of intense staring and talking, and I knew there I was going to sleep with this girl. I saw her again the next week and I drove her home again. While we were driving, I told her we should hangout together the next day. She accepted. I picked her up the next day while I presume her boyfriend was working. We went out for a sushi lunch, and it eventually came up that we were attracted to each other. We kissed a few times in the empty Sushi place. We then went back to my place and had sex.

We hooked up a few more times after that. I gave her a ride the entire semester and we would often make out just before dropping her home. After the semester ended, she went “no contact” with me. We were Facebook friends at that point, but my messages were never returned. A few months passed, and she posted a picture of her engagement ring on her page. The boyfriend that was cheating on decided to ask her to marry him. They got married, had a child together, and then divorced. I didn’t keep up with what she was doing after that until I messaged her a few months ago.

She had changed her Facebook profile name back to her original name and not her married name. I messaged her to hangout and picked her up from a job interview after I got out of work. We went out together and had a few drinks in which she explained to me she was dating some other guy. We still ended up kissing and went back to my apartment together. We had sex there after a little talking her into it. She let me know she wasn’t leaving the new guy for me. We met up together a week later and had sex together again. After our second time together, she became adamant that she wasn’t leaving the new guy. We haven’t met up since then.

We have spoken over text a few times and she told me “You always come at a bad time” and she is “taken.” We don’t meet up casually or as friends to do stuff together since it wouldn’t work out like that. I do from time to time send her little “thinking of you” messages that she reacts to. But otherwise, we don’t talk about the two times I “made a liar out of her.”

“made a liar out of her.” Newbie told me that once and I liked it. So I included it in the story. Also these stories are supposed to be fun. Read the story as if detailed by the Warden of SuperJail
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_CKJ4q5Tu4

uziq wrote:

i think girls are concerned that too many selfies on a profile makes them look like they don’t have a social life. it’s a normies thing.

i can see why a woman looking at a man’s profile consisting entirely of solo shots might wonder if he’s a total sociopath or something. i think women’s experience of being ‘online’ in general probably has an everyday familiarity with creeper activity. i’ve dated some girls with moderately large instagram followings, nothing near fame or influencer status, and then the ‘lone male’ sliding into the DMs is like a universal background hum.

having a few group shots is just a simple coded message that you’re normal enough to hang out with people. pretty low bar. haha.

uziq wrote:

‘do you want to come and watch me knock balls into the middle distance for 2 hours before i go abroad to date other women?’

you’re finessing a good game!

Dilbert_X wrote:

Dauntless wrote:

Oh, silly Dilbert!

Its northern south-east asia you mongs