thisghettoperson wrote:
Fuck no.
Search
Search results: 3,130 found, showing up to 50
Stop with the backhanded insults.Bertster7 wrote:
It's not selective reading. It's a direct response to exactly what you wrote. If that's not what you mean you should learn to express yourself a bit better.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
You guys are doing some awfully selective reading today.
Nobody will ever take you seriously until you do.
No, its the fact that what he was accused of doing, breaking an entering, is not in regards to his race. He was trying to open a door in a manner that looked like breaking and entering. It doesn't matter what his race is in that regards. The fact that he immediately "went there" implies he has some kind of chip on his shoulders.Bertster7 wrote:
Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Thats of course if you believe what he says.AussieReaper wrote:
Think he may have been loud and tumultuous at the officer who refused to give him name and badge number?
A guy who cries racism at the first instance of police questioning loses a little credibility in my book.
What a retarded post. Anyone who complains of racism has no credibility?
You sir, have lost all credibility.
You guys are doing some awfully selective reading today.
Well you must have tolerant neighbors/ don't live in an apartment.Bertster7 wrote:
I have done. Many times. No police. Environmental health sometimes - who have the power to confiscate audio equipment...
So giving them two different forms of ID is not cooperating? Alongside the fact that Gates had breathing difficulties and could not physically have been screaming and yelling at the cops as they claim and the other guy with Gates denies. They refused to give their badge number to him, they aren't allowed to withold that information - it's just like refusal to show ID to the police, there is no difference. The difference here is that Gates did produce ID, the police didn't provide their badge numbers.
If and when he did eventually show the officers his ID he could have been uncooperative for other reasons. Usually that should be the end of it but we aren't told what happened after that. I've had misunderstandings with the police. You don't get arrested for cooperating with them. I can only imagine what would have happened if I had been unruly that time when an officer thought I was peeping on my neighbor.
No.
Whether I break the law or not has nothing to do with money.
Whether I break the law or not has nothing to do with money.
Thats of course if you believe what he says.AussieReaper wrote:
Think he may have been loud and tumultuous at the officer who refused to give him name and badge number?
A guy who cries racism at the first instance of police questioning loses a little credibility in my book.
You can be arrested for disorderly conduct in your own home. If you don't think so, try blasting music at 3 in the morning and refuse to turn it off.Bertster7 wrote:
He did what he was supposed to do, the cops didn't. Then they arrested him for disorderly conduct in his own home - despite the fact you have to be in a public place (or someone elses privately owned premises) to be charged with disorderly conduct.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
It amazing how fast common sense goes out the door when it turns into a everyone vs. lowing thread.
All the mans gotta do when the cops ask him for his ID is give the cops his ID and that would be the end of it.
Second, if you look like you're trying to break into house, it doesn't matter what skin color you are. Get the fuck over it.
It's very clear cut and the cops were in the wrong. If he got a bit over excited, then fair enough, it's his house, he's allowed to.
And no, you can't just go apeshit with cops. If you refuse to cooperate, they can arrest you.
It amazing how fast common sense goes out the door when it turns into a everyone vs. lowing thread.
All the mans gotta do when the cops ask him for his ID is give the cops his ID and that would be the end of it.
Second, if you look like you're trying to break into house, it doesn't matter what skin color you are. Get the fuck over it.
All the mans gotta do when the cops ask him for his ID is give the cops his ID and that would be the end of it.
Second, if you look like you're trying to break into house, it doesn't matter what skin color you are. Get the fuck over it.
You have very selective reading skills.AussieReaper wrote:
Black Harvard scholar equals shithead, lowing? Grow up.Gates said he turned over his driver's license and Harvard ID — both with his photos — and repeatedly asked for the name and badge number of the officer, who refused. He said he then followed the officer as he left his house onto his front porch, where he was handcuffed in front of other officers, Gates said in a statement released by his attorney, fellow Harvard scholar Charles Ogletree, on a Web site Gates oversees, TheRoot.com
He was arrested on a disorderly conduct charge after police said he "exhibited loud and tumultuous behavior." He was released later that day on his own recognizance. An arraignment was scheduled for Aug. 26.
Sounded completely normal to me.S3v3N wrote:
all i could think of was the movie Fargo while she was talking..
don't cha know?
Sounds like an episode of Reno 911.
It makes a ring ring sound.
I don't even know why people would want to listen to the first 2 seconds to a song over and over again.
I don't even know why people would want to listen to the first 2 seconds to a song over and over again.
For someone claiming to be a baseball fall he sure throws like a girl.
Ran into that mexican bennet once.
He called me a hacker.
He called me a hacker.
No.
And all ya'll motherfuckers that do need motherfucking jesus.
And all ya'll motherfuckers that do need motherfucking jesus.
Dude you need to grow a pairKimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
hah that's itburni$te wrote:
too many feel this has to be a machoman/sausagefest/boys club. +1 for making up your own mind.Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
and that is why i cant dedicate myself here.. too much negativity/persistant assholes
i think it's about time i leave bf2s
you'd think that the 'female gamers' thread would be safe enough for a female to post in ! hah
i doubt i'll delete this account cause there are so many funny threads and yes good people toooooo//
lately on here feelings start to get hurt so i snap back but i'd rather just be able to ignore them(a block list?) so i dont see their posts at all (that would be sweeeet)
have to have a tough suit when i log in to the trenches here of thousands(?) of men.
ooo all these feelings.. my hormones are on the rise
omg r u girl?? will you e-date me fatherted?FatherTed wrote:
lol @ this thread
Well it seems like it should be illegal to do that unless you're in actual distress but then again how much distress can you be in if you have time to fly your flag upside down. Kinda like calling 911 for fun but in a less extreme way.
I don't believe it should be the school's job to scare kids out of having to try and have sex. They also shouldn't be encouraging it either. All they should be doing is stating facts and educating. Keep your ideals out of it all. If someone wants to have to sex they should be aware of the facts. If someone doesn't want to have sex, thats their choice.BigOrangeArmy wrote:
Still, the point remains: Only surefire way ( if (5x) you follow it) is abstinence. Only way to keep STD's and high school babies away from little Johnny and Suzie is to...not have sex. You can still get STD's via mouth-to-genitals (or mouth-to-mouth depending on where the STD is). Call me old-fashioned, but believe it or not, it can be done. All you need is...self-control...oh wait, this is our culture we're talking about .
Course, nobody is man enough to state the obvious---you wont get a little baby in high school or warts on your penis if you be smart and don't stick it into a girl's V (or mouth, or butthole for that matter). Is it really worth the risk?
The first thing this reminded me of was japanese anime.
Who forgets to turn their dildo off? I mean honestly.
Maybe if you could do it without saying things like "sigh" or asking me if I'm stupid.ghettoperson wrote:
*sigh*
Would you like me to explain my point to you again then? I believe Bertster got it, so I don't think it was that terribly phrased.
Either way I think I know how you feel about all this. I was just nippicking at your choice of words.
Well at least you guys didn't lock someone up for 10 years for getting a bj.Turquoise wrote:
Wow.... I'm ashamed to see this connected to my state.
Yes, I am stupid.ghettoperson wrote:
Oh right, my bad, I guess I didn't actually post anything.
Seriously dude, are you just really stupid or something? I've noticed this before when you miss the point of a post and then you get all pissy when someone points out that you got the wrong end of the stick.
Welcome to debate and serious talk.
Way to keep it adult.
Kids don't need to be told sex is enjoyable. They figure it out on their own.ghettoperson wrote:
You've clearly completely missed my point, and it was so obvious I really can't be bothered to restate it.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Yes, because what teenager doesn't know that sex is enjoyable...ghettoperson wrote:
Doesn't sound like such a bad thing. The problem with current drug, alcohol and sex education programs is that they ignore parts, or lie about them, so when kids find out this isn't true, they figure all the rest is lies/exaggerated. So by saying that sex is enjoyable, kids should take more note of things such as using condoms.
I didn't miss your point. You never made one.
Yes, because what teenager doesn't know that sex is enjoyable...ghettoperson wrote:
Doesn't sound like such a bad thing. The problem with current drug, alcohol and sex education programs is that they ignore parts, or lie about them, so when kids find out this isn't true, they figure all the rest is lies/exaggerated. So by saying that sex is enjoyable, kids should take more note of things such as using condoms.
Next!usmarine wrote:
MTV is such fail.
haha right off the bus
Woo go fatties!
29 BMI ftw!
29 BMI ftw!
Must be a girl cuz you can't take a joke. Women foke be way to sensitive.
Middle Earth lolololololololl
It's either that or your penis keeps getting in the way.Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
"Such a trade-off is seen in the wild and has been observed in chickens and fish." hrmmmmmKing_County_Downy wrote:
Hmmm this makes it interesting...
"Ugly men make more sperm during sex"
"ATTRACTIVE men produce less sperm during sex, according to a new study."
So what does this mean?
--
so as a last resort if i cant get preggo i should search out for ugly blokes/ got it
Good.
Anyone who makes penis shaped food is clearly a pedophile.
Anyone who makes penis shaped food is clearly a pedophile.
That's because these people are more likely to be repeat offenders.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Hate crimes are punished more harshly than 'normal' crimes.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
All crimes are hate crimes. No need to get your panties in a bunch over labels.
If you die falling into chocolate you deserve it.SEREVENT wrote:
Why are you making jokes? Someone still died...
Rather than say, men.Finray wrote:
Rather than, say, sheep?Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Yeah, I come alot faster when its females.
Says alot about you that the first thing you think of is bestiality.
All crimes are hate crimes. No need to get your panties in a bunch over labels.
Yeah, I come alot faster when its females.
I'd drop them into the air conditioning fan.ATG wrote:
I killed frogs when I was about 8 years old. Who gives a flying fuck?
Weedios. "Finally it is weed for breakfast".Swan wrote:
weed > corn flakesghettoperson wrote:
It's certainly ironic that the people forgetting about it won't be pot smokers.El Beardo wrote:
Anyone else find that amusing?
I was just reading this article on Digg. Sounds like he's doing pretty well for himself still, although without Kelloggs.
It's in your head. I will occasionally do this as well. You hear these noises so often that your mind expects them to be happening to the point where you can almost hear it happening.
Either that or its someone in another room youre hearing.
Either that or its someone in another room youre hearing.
Well she should be glad she wasn't sentenced to 12 years of slavery.
Someones goin get raped.
Fact: Putting Fact: before a sentence makes it a fact.
Yes, well we live in the land of "If you get hurt or fat, its always someone else fault."LividBovine wrote:
I got it, I will post a sign on my lawn saying "I shoot intruders". That will keep them away. CAn't get sued then either.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
It's something about them not being made properly aware of the dangers when they enter your property. Like why cigarettes are required to tell you they can kill you.ghettoperson wrote:
What are the rules about having dangerous stuff on your property? My mates house has a separate garage, and kids like to climb on other peoples neighbouring garages. Now I was all for busting out the cement and and broken glass, however my mother informs me that this would get us in trouble if someone hurt themselves; apparently you're not supposed to have dangerous shit lying around? Is that true?
I think every states needs to adopt a "no trespassing law". If you enter someone elses property uninvited the owners are not liable for an injuries incurred on said property. Of course I know it would never be adopted because common sense has no place in our courtrooms.
and senator Biden voted which way again? was it for or against the invasion?Kmarion wrote:
For those that just cant quite get it on their own..Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Is that supposed to be Irony or are we pretending the Iraq war never happened?Kmarion wrote:
Biden says the U.S. “cannot dictate to another sovereign nation what they can and cannot do.”
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washi … ional+news
http://i44.tinypic.com/dgmmnb.jpg
We have a new administration.
It's something about them not being made properly aware of the dangers when they enter your property. Like why cigarettes are required to tell you they can kill you.ghettoperson wrote:
What are the rules about having dangerous stuff on your property? My mates house has a separate garage, and kids like to climb on other peoples neighbouring garages. Now I was all for busting out the cement and and broken glass, however my mother informs me that this would get us in trouble if someone hurt themselves; apparently you're not supposed to have dangerous shit lying around? Is that true?
Anybody who votes no has clearly never watched an episode of Maury. Some bitches just got it coming.
Is that supposed to be Irony or are we pretending the Iraq war never happened?Kmarion wrote:
Biden says the U.S. “cannot dictate to another sovereign nation what they can and cannot do.”
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washi … ional+news
I find if kinda funny that somebody would risk their life over a tv.FatherTed wrote:
I still find it laughable someone will condone deadly force for the theft of a TV
Yeah but he wasn't a terrorist before we detained him. He was a random guy off the street and we turned him into one.Harmor wrote:
Released Gitmo prisoner now leads Taliban forces against U.S. troopsWhoopsie.New York Post wrote:
As Marine Corps forces roll into southern Afghanistan, they face a familiar enemy - Mullah Zakir, a former Guantanamo Bay prisoner who now leads a reconstituted Taliban ...