nah. cameras.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Oh they had weapons eh?
well, that's not quite true. it was an unedited direct recording. how is it propaganda?ATG wrote:
The video in question reminded me of toykio rose and other propaganda machines.
It was designed to stir up those who don't understand war and didn't think we should be there in the first place.
It was utterly unworthy of comment, let alone a forty page thread.
Cameras shaped like RPG's...11 Bravo wrote:
nah. cameras.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Oh they had weapons eh?
Maybe I was onto something.eleven bravo wrote:
flowers
Last edited by DBBrinson1 (2010-04-22 15:41:31)
It was edited to draw your attention away from the fact that there were weapons among those folks and to make it seem as though the Apache pilots were sadistic beasts.ruisleipa wrote:
well, that's not quite true. it was an unedited direct recording. how is it propaganda?ATG wrote:
The video in question reminded me of toykio rose and other propaganda machines.
It was designed to stir up those who don't understand war and didn't think we should be there in the first place.
It was utterly unworthy of comment, let alone a forty page thread.
Last edited by ruisleipa (2010-04-23 00:26:13)
Bullshit, I understand what needs to be done there, I've been to Iraq and when they engage the truck that's picking up the wounded it is nothing more than Murder by some fucking nuts in the helicopter as there absolutely no threat to life and no reason to engage it.ATG wrote:
The video in question reminded me of toykio rose and other propaganda machines.
It was designed to stir up those who don't understand war and didn't think we should be there in the first place.
It was utterly unworthy of comment, let alone a forty page thread.
including you.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Interesting read. I hope this clears up a few things for a few people around here.
Actually I was referring to you and LostFate.ruisleipa wrote:
including you.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Interesting read. I hope this clears up a few things for a few people around here.
Last edited by -Sh1fty- (2010-04-23 01:23:10)
oh you have been there? where? what year? what base? what was your job?LostFate wrote:
Bullshit, I understand what needs to be done there, I've been to Iraq and when they engage the truck that's picking up the wounded it is nothing more than Murder by some fucking nuts in the helicopter as there absolutely no threat to life and no reason to engage it.ATG wrote:
The video in question reminded me of toykio rose and other propaganda machines.
It was designed to stir up those who don't understand war and didn't think we should be there in the first place.
It was utterly unworthy of comment, let alone a forty page thread.
lol,I don't have to prove myself to you fucknut, however since you will no doubt try and denounce me otherwise, i will.11 Bravo wrote:
oh you have been there? where? what year? what base? what was your job?LostFate wrote:
Bullshit, I understand what needs to be done there, I've been to Iraq and when they engage the truck that's picking up the wounded it is nothing more than Murder by some fucking nuts in the helicopter as there absolutely no threat to life and no reason to engage it.ATG wrote:
The video in question reminded me of toykio rose and other propaganda machines.
It was designed to stir up those who don't understand war and didn't think we should be there in the first place.
It was utterly unworthy of comment, let alone a forty page thread.
As i have posted before shifty i agree that the first engagement is justified but engaging the van is not.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Actually I was referring to you and LostFate.ruisleipa wrote:
including you.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Interesting read. I hope this clears up a few things for a few people around here.
FYI I don't agree with engaging the van either, but questioning the engagement of the first group of armed individuals is stupid.
I'm sorry if my conscience offends you, i call it how i see it and i don't see a reason to engage the Van, you say there cleaning up there scene as if to get rid of the evidence that they had fire arms correct? yet the Apache TI caught the whole scene on film.11 Bravo wrote:
that guy was not wounded, he was dead. and they were only grabbing that one dead guy. they were cleaning the scene. you calling it murder makes me question you.
no...not clean the weapons...although if they had the time they would. its a common tactic. clear out the know insurgents and leave the other people behind to make it look like they just killed some innocent civies.LostFate wrote:
I'm sorry if my conscience offends you, i call it how i see it and i don't see a reason to engage the Van, you say there cleaning up there scene as if to get rid of the evidence that they had fire arms correct? yet the Apache TI caught the whole scene on film.11 Bravo wrote:
that guy was not wounded, he was dead. and they were only grabbing that one dead guy. they were cleaning the scene. you calling it murder makes me question you.
That wouldn't be a problem because as i said before the Apache TI caught the who thing on film.11 Bravo wrote:
no...not clean the weapons...although if they had the time they would. its a common tactic. clear out the know insurgents and leave the other people behind to make it look like they just killed some innocent civies.LostFate wrote:
I'm sorry if my conscience offends you, i call it how i see it and i don't see a reason to engage the Van, you say there cleaning up there scene as if to get rid of the evidence that they had fire arms correct? yet the Apache TI caught the whole scene on film.11 Bravo wrote:
that guy was not wounded, he was dead. and they were only grabbing that one dead guy. they were cleaning the scene. you calling it murder makes me question you.