Cybargs wrote:
Flecco wrote:
krazed wrote:
but parker owns guns
which means we have to put the canadian rule to that factor as well
which is
guilty until we find something to charge you with that you can't fight so we can say you're guilty and a danger to public safety
afaik he didn't deliver knives to a number of other people, but kept the money they gave him
wut
There's shitloads of guns in Canukistania isn't there?
Canadian gun laws are pretty non-restrictive.
not really, no
to flecco
yes there are, although a large number of them are "restricted" (this means scary looking)
so you can only take them to government approved ranges.... which doesn't sound bad but then you have to look into how hard it is to get approved, and they can cancel it at any time if they feel like it.... with no reason given
and in order to take the scary guns to the range you pretty much have to beg for a piece of paper called an authorization to transport.... which says you can only drive straight to the range and then straight back with no stops or detours along the way...
they can also deny this for no reason other then you weren't polite on the phone, or if your provincial firearms officer is of the type that really doesn't like guns and only took the position to limit how people can use them.
holy shit derail
although if you would like to hear me rant some more feel free to post here
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=130801Finray wrote:
liquidat0r wrote:
Finray wrote:
1/5 days in on time.
?
Oops, thought I was in EE chat.
loltard
Last edited by krazed (2009-12-07 04:12:06)